The long and the short of it: Rule-based relative length discrimination in carrion crows, Corvus corone

Behavioural Processes

Volumn 107, Issue , 2014, Pages 142-149

  Moll, Felix W ^a   Nieder, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Continuous quantity; Corvid songbird; Executive function; Intermediate relation; Intermediate size; Rule switching

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; MAGNITUDE; PASSERINE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COGNITION; CORVUS CORONE; CROW; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; TASK PERFORMANCE; ANIMAL; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

CORVIDA; CORVIDAE; CORVUS CORONE; PASSERI;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CROWS; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; MALE; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 84908566470     PISSN: 03766357     EISSN: 18728308     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Al Ain S., Giret N., Grand M., Kreutzer M., Bovet D. The discrimination of discrete and continuous amounts in African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Anim. Cogn. 2009, 12:145-154.
2. Andersson S. Female preference for long tails in lekking Jackson widowbirds - experimental evidence. Anim. Behav. 1992, 43:379-388.
3. Beran M.J. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) accurately compare poured liquid quantities. Anim. Cogn. 2010, 13:641-649.
4. Bird C.D., Emery N.J. Insightful problem solving and creative tool modification by captive nontool-using rooks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:10370-10375.
5. Bogale B.A., Kamata N., Mioko K., Sugita S. Quantity discrimination in jungle crows Corvus macrorhynchos. Anim. Behav. 2011, 82:635-641.
6. Bond A.B., Kamil A.C., Balda R.P. Social complexity and transitive inference in corvids. Anim. Behav. 2003, 65:479-487.
7. Bongard S., Nieder A. Basic mathematical rules are encoded by primate prefrontal cortex neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:2277-2282.
8. Brown W.L., Overall J.E., Gentry G.V. 'Absolute' versus 'relational' discrimination of intermediate size in the rhesus monkey. Am. J. Psychol. 1959, 72:593-596.
9. Cantlon J.F., Brannon E.M. Semantic congruity affects numerical judgments similarly in monkeys and humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:16507-16511.
10. Caselli L., Chelazzi L. Does the macaque monkey provide a good model for studying human executive control? A comparative behavioural study of task switching. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e21489. 10.1371/journal.pone.0021489.
11. Coburn C.A. The behaviour of the crow, Corvus americanus. J. Anim. Behav. Boston 1914, 4:185-201.
12. Eiselt A.K., Nieder A. Representation of abstract quantitative rules applied to spatial and numerical magnitudes in primate prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:7526-7534.
13. Emery N.J., Clayton N.S. Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jays. Nature 2001, 414:443-446.
14. Emery N.J., Clayton N.S. The mentality of crows: convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes. Science 2004, 306:1903-1907.
15. Emmerton J., Renner J.C. Scalar effects in the visual discrimination of numerosity by pigeons. Learn. Behav. 2006, 34:176-192.
16. Emmerton J., Renner J.C. Local rather than global processing of visual arrays in numerosity discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia). Anim. Cogn. 2009, 12:511-526.
17. Gazes R.P., Chee N.W., Hampton R.R. Cognitive mechanisms for transitive inference performance in rhesus monkeys: measuring the influence of associative strength and inferred order. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 2012, 38:331.
18. Gentry G.V., Overall J.E., Brown W.L. Transpositional responses of rhesus monkeys to stimulus - objects of intermediate size. Am. J. Psychol. 1959, 72:453-455.
19. Gonzalez R.C., Gentry G.V., Bitterman M.E. Relational discrimination of intermediate size in the chimpanzee. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 1954, 47:385-388.
20. Grosenick L., Clement T.S., Fernald R.D. Fish can infer social rank by observation alone. Nature 2007, 445:429-432.
21. Güntürkün O. The avian 'prefrontal cortex' and cognition. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2005, 15:686-693.
22. Hoffmann A., Rüttler V., Nieder A. Ontogeny of object permanence and object tracking in the carrion crow (Corvus corone). Anim. Behav. 2011, 82:359-367.
23. Hunt G.R. Manufacture and use of hook-tools by New Caledonian crows. Nature 1996, 379:249-251.
24. Hunt S., Low J., Burns K.C. Adaptive numerical competency in a food-hoarding songbird. Proc. R. Soc. B 2008, 275:2373-2379.
25. Jersild A.T. Mental set and shift. Arch. Psychol. 1927, (89):5-82.
26. Koehler O. Vom Erlernen unbenannter Anzahlen bei Vögeln. Naturwissenschaften 1941, 29:201-218.
27. Koehler O. The ability of birds to "count". Bull. Anim. Behav. 1951, 9:41-45.
28. Lazareva O.F., Wasserman E.A., Young M.E. Transposition in pigeons: reassessing Spence (1937) with multiple discrimination training. Learn. Behav. 2005, 33:22-46.
29. Lazareva O.F., Miner M., Wasserman E.A., Young M.E. Multiple-pair training enhances transposition in pigeons. Learn. Behav. 2008, 36:174-187.
30. Lazareva O.F. Relational learning in a context of transposition: a review. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2012, 97:231-248.
31. Lyon B.E. Egg recognition and counting reduce costs of avian conspecific brood parasitism. Nature 2003, 422:495-499.
32. Mark R.F., Maxwell A. Circle size discrimination and transposition behaviour in cichlid fish. Anim. Behav. 1969, 17:155-158.
33. McGonigle B.O., Chalmers M. Are monkeys logical?. Nature 1977, 267:694-696.
34. McGonigle B.O., Jones B.T. Levels of stimulus processing by the squirrel monkey: relative and absolute judgements compared. Perception 1978, 7:635-659.
35. Merten K., Nieder A. Compressed scaling of abstract numerosity representations in adult humans and monkeys. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2009, 21:333-346.
36. Miller E.K., Cohen J.D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2001, 24:167-202.
37. Moller A.P., et al. Sexual selection and tail streamers in the barn swallow. Proc. R. Soc. B 1998, 265:409-414.
38. Moller A.P. Male tail length and female mate choice in the monogamous swallow Hirudo rustica. Anim. Behav. 1990, 39:458-465.
39. Paz-Y-Miño C.G., Bond A.B., Kamil A.C., Balda R.P. Pinyon jays use transitive inference to predict social dominance. Nature 2004, 430:778-781.
40. Pepperberg I. Numerical competence in an african gray parrot (Psittacus erithacus). J. Comp. Psychol. 1994, 108:36-44.
41. Pollok B., Prior H., Güntürkün O. Development of object permanence in food-storing magpies (Pica pica). J. Comp. Psychol. 2000, 114:148-157.
42. Rogers R., Monsell S. Cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 1995, 124:207-231.
43. Rugani R., Regolin L., Vallortigara G. Discrimination of small numerosities in young chicks. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 2008, 34:388-399.
44. Scarf D., Hayne H., Colombo M. Pigeons on par with primates in numerical competence. Science 2011, 334:1664.
45. Smirnova A.A., Lazareva O.F., Zorina Z.A. Use of number by crows: investigation by matching and oddity learning. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2000, 73:163-176.
46. Spence K.W. The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. Psychol. Rev. 1937, 44:430-444.
47. Spence K.W. The basis of solution by chimpanzees of the intermediate size problem. J. Exp. Psychol. 1942, 31:257-274.
48. Stoet G., Snyder L.H. Executive control and task-switching in monkeys. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:1357-1364.
49. Stoet G., Snyder L.H. Extensive practice does not eliminate human switch costs. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2007, 7:192-197.
50. Stoet G., Snyder L.H. Neural correlates of executive control functions in the monkey. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2009, 13:228-234.
51. Templeton C.N., Greene E., Davis K. Allometry of alarm calls: black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size. Science 2005, 308:1934-1937.
52. Thompson N.S. Individual identification and temporal patterning in the cawing of common crows. Commun. Behav. Biol. 1969, 4:29-33.
53. Tudusciuc O., Nieder A. Comparison of length judgments and the Müller-Lyer illusion in monkeys and humans. Exp. Brain Res. 2010, 207:221-231.
54. Vallentin D., Bongard S., Nieder A. Numerical rule coding in the prefrontal, premotor, and posterior parietal cortices of macaques. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:6621-6630.
55. Veit L., Nieder A. Abstract rule neurons in the endbrain support intelligent behaviour in corvid songbirds. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:2878.
56. Veit L., Hartmann K., Nieder A. Neuronal correlates of visual working memory in the corvid endbrain. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34:7778-7786.
57. Weir A.A.S., Chappell J., Kacelnik A. Shaping of hooks in New Caledonian crows. Science 2002, 297:981.
58. White D.J., Ho L., Freed-Brown G. Counting chicks before they hatch: female cowbirds can time readiness of a host nest for parasitism. Psychol. Sci. 2009, 20:1140-1145.
59. Wilson B., Mackintosh N.J., Boakes R.A. Transfer of relational rules in matching and oddity learning by pigeons and corvids. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1985, 37:313-332.
60. Xia L., Emmerton J., Siemann M., Delius J.D. Pigeons (Columba livia) learn to link numerosities with symbols. J. Comp. Psychol. 2001, 115:83-91.
61. Zorina Z.A., Smirnova A.A. Quantitative evaluations in gray crows: generalization of the relative attribute 'larger set'. Neurosc. Behav. Physiol. 1996, 26:357-364.
62. Zucca P., Milos N., Vallortigara G. Piagetian object permanence and its development in Eurasian jays (Garrulus glandarius). Anim. Cogn. 2007, 10:243-258.