Considering the role of "need for cognition" in students' acceptance of climate change & evolution

American Biology Teacher

Volumn 77, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 250-257

  Kudrna, Jeremy ^a   Shore, Marta ^b   Wassenberg, Deena ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

climate change; critical thinking; Darwinism; evolution; global warming; Need for cognition; science denial; skepticism

Indexed keywords

EID: 84961381300     PISSN: 00027685     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/abt.2015.77.4.4     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bost, A. (2007). The need for cognition. Center of Inquiry: assessment notes. Available online at http://www.liberalarts.wabash.edu/ncs/.
2. Cacioppo, J.T. & Petty, R.E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
3. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Feinstein, J.A. & Jarvis, W.B.G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: the life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
4. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E. & Kao, C.F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
5. Cotner, S., Brooks, D.C. & Moore, R. (2010). Is the age of the Earth one of our "sorest troubles?" Students' perceptions about deep time affect their acceptance of evolutionary theory. Evolution, 64, 858-864.
6. Coutinho, S.A. & Woolery, L.M. (2004). The need for cognition and life satisfaction among college students. College Student Journal, 38, 203-206.
7. Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
8. Day, E.A., Espejo, J., Kowollik, V., Boatman, P.R. & McEntire, L.E. (2007). Modeling the links between need for cognition and the acquisition of a complex skill. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 201-212.
9. Dunlap, R.E., Van Liere, K.D., Mertig, A.G. & Jones, R.E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.
10. Fleischhauer, M., Enge, S., Brocke, B., Ullrich, J., Strobel, A. & Strobel, A. (2010). Same or different? Clarifying the relationship of need for cognition to personality and intelligence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 82-96.
11. Fusco, E., Snider, A. & Luo, S. (2012). Perception of global climate change as a mediator of the effects of major and religious affiliation on college students' environmentally responsible behavior. Environmental Education Research, 18, 815-830.
12. Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: a study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77, 167-187.
13. Ha, M., Haury, D.L & Nehm, R.H. (2012). Feeling of certainty: uncovering a missing link between knowledge and acceptance of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 95-121.
14. Hamilton, L.C. (2012). Did the Arctic ice recover? Demographics of true and false climate facts. Weather, Climate, and Society, 4, 236-249.
15. Hmielowski, J.D., Feldman, L., Myers, T.A., Leiserowitz, A. & Maibach, E. (2014). An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 23, 866-883.
16. IPC. (2013). Summary for policymakers. In T.F. Stocker et al. (Eds.), Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Jaeggi, S.M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J. & Perrig, W.J. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105, 6829-6833.
18. Johnson, R.L. & Peeples, E.E. (1987). The role of scientific understanding in college: student acceptance of evolution. American Biology Teacher, 49, 93-98.
19. Kardash, C.M. & Scholes, R.J. (1996). Effects of preexisting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 260-271.
20. Kitzmiller et al. v Dover Area School District, et al. 2005. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. Case number 04cv2688. Available online at http://ncse.com/files/pub/legal/kitzmiller/highlights/2005-12-20-Kitzmiller-decision.pdf.
21. Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd Ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
22. Krosnick, J.A. & MacInnis, B. (2010). Frequent viewers of Fox News are less likely to accept scientists' views of global warming. Stanford University. Available online at http://woods.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/files/Global-Warming-Fox-News.pdf.
23. Lombardi, D., Sinatra, G.M. & Nussbaum, E.M. (2013). Plausibility reappraisals and shifts in middle school students' climate change conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 27, 50-62.
24. Lombrozo, T., Thanukos, A. & Weisberg, M. (2008). The importance of understanding the nature of science for accepting evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1, 290-298.
25. Lorenzoni, I. & Pidgeon, N.F. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change, 77, 73-95.
26. Miller, J.D., Scott, E.C. & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313, 765-766.
27. Moore, R. & Cotner, S. (2009). Educational malpractice: the impact of including creationism in high school biology courses. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2, 95-100.
28. Moore, R., Cotner, S. & Bates, A. (2009). The influence of religion and high school biology courses on students' knowledge of evolution when they enter college. Journal of Effective Teaching, 9, 4-12.
29. Oreskes, N. (2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306, 1686.
30. Paz-y-Miño C., G. & Espinosa, A. (2009). Acceptance of evolution increases with student academic level: a comparison between a secular and a religious college. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2, 655-675.
31. Peterson, R.A. & Kim, Y. (2013). On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 194-198.
32. Petty, R.E., Briñol, P., Loersch, C. & McCaslin, M.J. (2009). The need for cognition. In M.R. Leary & R.H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior (pp. 318-329). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
33. Pew Research Center. (2011). Modest rise in number saying there is "solid evidence" of global warming. Available online at http://www.peoplepress.org/2011/12/01/modest-rise-in-number-saying-there-is-solidevidence-of-global-warming/.
34. R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
35. Revelle, W. (2012). Psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. Available online at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/psych.pdf.
36. Rutledge, M.L. & Sadler, K.C. (2007). Reliability of the Measure of Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution (MA TE) instrument with university students. American Biology Teacher, 69, 332-335.
37. Sadowski, C.J. (1993). An examination of the short need for cognition scale. Journal of Psychology, 127, 451-454.
38. Sadowski, C.J. & Gulgoz, S. (1992). Association of need for cognition and course grades. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 498.
39. Sadowski, C.J. & Gulgoz, S. (1996). Elaborative processing mediates the relationship between need for cognition and academic performance. Journal of Psychology, 130, 303-307.
40. Sharma, A. (2012). Global climate change: what has science education got to do with it? Science & Education, 21, 33-53.
41. Shtulman, A. & Calabi, P. (2008). Learning, understanding, and acceptance: the case of evolution. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of Cognitive Science Society (pp. 235-240). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
42. Shtulman, A. & Calabi, P. (2012). Cognitive constraints on the understanding and acceptance of evolution. In K. Rosengren & M. Evans (Eds.), Evolution Challenges: Integrating Research and Practice in Teaching and Learning about Evolution (pp. 47-65). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43. Sloan Wilson, D. (2005). Evolution for everyone: how to increase acceptance of, interest in, and knowledge about evolution. PLoS Biology, 3, e364.
44. State of Louisiana. (2008). Act 473: Louisiana Science Education Act. Available online at http://www.legis.state.la.us/lss/lss.asp?doc=631000.
45. State of Tennessee. (2012). House Bill 368, An Act to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 49, Chapter 6, Part 10, relative to teaching scientific subjects in elementary schools. Available online at http://www.capitol. tn.gov/Bills/107/Bill/HB0368.pdf.
46. Thompson, N.E. & Wheeler, J.P. (2008). Learning environment: creating and implementing a safe, supportive learning environment. Journal of Family Consumer Sciences Education, 26 (National Teacher Standards 2), 33-43.
47. Tolentino, E., Curry, L. & Leak, G. (1990). Further validation of the short form of the need for cognition scale. Psychological Reports, 66, 321-322.
48. Weber, E.U. & Stern, P.C. (2011). Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist, 66, 315-328.
49. Webster, D.M. & Kruglanski, A.W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.
50. Zehr, S.C. (2000). Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 85-103.