Applicability and Feasibility of Systematic Review for Performing Evidence-Based Risk Assessment in Food and Feed Safety

Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

Volumn 55, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 1026-1034

  Aiassa, E ^a   Higgins, J P T ^b   Frampton, G K ^c   Greiner, M ^d   Afonso, A ^a   Amzal, B ^e   Deeks, J ^f   Dorne, J L ^a   Glanville, J ^g   Lovei G L ^h   Nienstedt, K ^a   O'connor A M ⁱ   Pullin, A S ^j   Rajic A ^k   Verloo, D ^a  

^a EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^d LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

^e London School of Hygiene Tropical Medicine   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^h AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

ⁱ IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^k UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

Evidence synthesis; meta analysis; risk model; transparency; uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; FOOD SAFETY; HEALTH HAZARDS; HEALTH RISKS; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK PERCEPTION; SAFETY ENGINEERING; TRANSPARENCY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

ADVERSE EVENTS; FOOD AND FEED SAFETY; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORKS; MULTI-PARAMETER MODELS; RISK MODEL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UNCERTAINTY;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

ANIMALIA;

ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ANIMAL WELFARE; ENVIRONMENT; FOOD; FOOD HANDLING; FOOD SAFETY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; NUTRITIONAL VALUE; PLANT; PROCEDURES; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARDS; TOXICOLOGY;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; ENVIRONMENT; FOOD; FOOD HANDLING; FOOD SAFETY; HUMANS; NUTRITIVE VALUE; PLANTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICOLOGY;

EID: 84961289290     PISSN: 10408398     EISSN: 15497852     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2013.769933     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. ADA (American Diabetes Association) (2012). Introduction. Diab. Care, 35 (Supplement 1): S1–S2; doi:10.2337/dc12-s001.
2. Asante-Duah, K. (2002). Public health risk assessment for human exposure to chemicals. In: Environmental Pollution, vol. 6. Alloway, B. J. and Trevors, J. T., Eds., Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
3. Busse, R., Orvain, J., Velasco, M., Perleth, M., Drummond, M., Gurtner, F., Jorgensen, T., Jovell, A., Malone, J., Ruther, A. and Wild, C. (2002). Best practice in undertaking and reporting health technology assessments. Int. J. Technol. Asses. Health Care. 18:361–422.
4. CEE (Collaboration for Environmental Evidence) (2013). Guidelines for Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis in Environmental Management. Version 4.2. Environmental Evidence. Available from www.environmentalevidence.org/information-for-authors.
5. Codex Alimentarius (2003). Codex principles and guidelines on foods derived from biotechnology. Rome: Codex Alimentarius Commission, Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, Food and Agriculture Organization. Available from ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/Publications/Booklets/Biotech/Biotech_2003e.pdf. Accessed on 20/08/2012.
6. CRD (Centre for Reviews and Dissemination) (2009). Systematic Reviews, CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. CRD, University of York, January 2009, ISBN 978-1-900640-47-3.
7. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2010). Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making. EFSA J. 8:1637, 1–90.
8. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) (2009a). Guidance on good practice in conducting scientific assessments in animal health using modelling. EFSA J. 7:1419, 1–38.
9. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2009b). Scientific opinion of the panel on animal health and welfare (AHAW) on a request from the Commission on porcine brucellosis (Brucella suis). The EFSA J. 7:1144, 1–112.
10. Glasziou, P. and Henegham, C. (2009). A spotter's guide for study designs. Evidence Based Med. 14:37–38.
11. Guirguis-Blake, J., Calonge, N., Miller, T., Siu, A., Teutsch, S., and Whitlock, E. (2007). Current processes of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Refining evidence-based recommendation development. Ann. Intern. Med. 147:117–22.
12. Higgins J. P. T. and Green, S. (Eds.) (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration.
13. Lichtenstein, A. H., Yetley, E. A., and Lau, J. (2008). Application of systematic review methodology to the field of nutrition. The J. Nutrit. 138:2297–306.
14. Marvier, M. (2011). Using meta-analysis to inform risk assessment and risk management. Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit. 6(Suppl. 1):S113–S118.
15. NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) (January 2009). The Guidelines Manual. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London. Available from http://www.nice.org.uk. Accessed on 20/08/2012.
16. NNR5 working group (Nordic Nutrition Recommendations) (2011). A guide for conducting Systematic Literature Reviews for the 5th edition of the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations. Revised ed. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen. Available from http://www.slv.se/upload/NNR5/A%20guide%20for%20conducting%20SLR%20for%20NNR5%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed on 20/08/2012.
17. Rylance, J., Pai, M., Lienhardt, C., and Garner, P. (2010). Priorities for tuberculosis research: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 10:886–892.
18. Sargeant, J. M., Del Rocio Amezcua, M., Rajić, A., and Waddell, L. (2005). A guide to conducting systematic reviews in agri-food public health. Available from http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/Collection/HP5-9-2005E.pdf. Accessed on 20/08/2012.
19. Van der Sluijs, J. P., Craye, M., Funtowicz, S., Kloprogge, P., Ravetz, J., Risbey, J., Fermi, V. E., and Campus, C. (2005). Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in model-based environmental assessment: the NUSAP system. Risk Anal. 25:481–492.
20. WHO (World Health Organisation) (2009). Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food. EHC 240. ISBN 978 92 4 157240 8. Available from http://www.who.int/foodsafety/chem/principles/en/index1.html. Accessed on 20/08/2012.
21. WHO (World Health Organisation) (2010). WHO Handbook for guideline development, 2010. Available from http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/mtct/grc_handbook_mar2010_1.pdf. Accessed on 20/08/2012.