Predicting compositions of microbial communities from stoichiometric models with applications for the biogas process

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Koch, Sabine ^a   Benndorf, Dirk ^b   Fronk, Karen ^c   Reichl, Udo ^a,b   Klamt, Steffen ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DYNAMICS OF COMPLEX TECHNICAL SYSTEMS   (Germany)

^b OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c HARZ UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Hierarchical optimization; Microbial communities; Prediction of community composition; Stoichiometric and constraint based modeling

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; BACTERIA; BIOGAS; BIOLOGY; BIOMASS; FORECASTING; GROWTH RATE; METABOLISM; METHANE; MICROORGANISMS; SUBSTRATES;

COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; CONSTRAINT-BASED MODELING; DESULFOVIBRIO VULGARIS; HIERARCHICAL OPTIMIZATION; MAINTENANCE COEFFICIENT; METHANOCOCCUS MARIPALUDIS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES; STOICHIOMETRIC METABOLIC MODELS;

ECOLOGY;

BIOGAS; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; METABOLISM; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; OPTIMIZATION; STOICHIOMETRY;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); DESULFOVIBRIO VULGARIS; METHANOCOCCUS MARIPALUDIS; METHANOSARCINA BARKERI;

EID: 84961286195     PISSN: 17546834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0429-x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Paerl HW, Pinckney JL. A mini-review of microbial consortia: their roles in aquatic production and biogeochemical cycling. Microbial Ecol. 1996;31(3):225-47.
2. Bardgett RD, Freeman C, Ostle NJ. Microbial contributions to climate change through carbon cycle feedbacks. ISME J. 2008;2(8):805-14.
3. Canfield DE, Glazer AN, Falkowski PG. The evolution and future of Earth's nitrogen cycle. Science. 2010;330(6001):192-6.
4. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Hamady M, Fraser-Liggett C, Knight R, Gordon JI. The human microbiome project: exploring the microbial part of ourselves in a changing world. Nature. 2007;449(7164):804.
5. Cho I, Blaser MJ. Applications of next-generation sequencing. The human microbiome: at the interface of health and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(4):260-70.
6. Faust K, Raes J. Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10(8):538-50.
7. Weiland P. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;85(4):849-60.
8. Varma A, Palsson BO. Metabolic flux balancing - basic concepts, scientific and practical use. Bio-Technol. 1994;12(10):994-8.
9. Price ND, Papin JA, Schilling CH, Palsson BO. Genome-scale microbial in silico models: the constraints-based approach. Trends Biotechnol. 2003;21(4):162-9.
10. Orth JD, Thiele I, Palsson BO. What is flux balance analysis? Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(3):245-8.
11. Stolyar S, Van Dien S, Hillesland KL, Pinel N, Lie TJ, Leigh JA, et al. Metabolic modeling of a mutualistic microbial community. Mol Syst Biol. 2007;3(1):92.
12. Bizukojc M, Dietz D, Sun J, Zeng AP. Metabolic modelling of syntrophic-like growth of a 1,3-propanediol producer, Clostridium butyricum, and a methanogenic archeon, Methanosarcina mazei, under anaerobic conditions. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2010;33(4):507-23.
13. Zomorrodi AR, Maranas CD. OptCom: a multi-level optimization framework for the metabolic modeling and analysis of microbial communities. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(2):e1002363.
14. Khandelwal RA, Olivier BG, Roling WF, Teusink B, Bruggeman FJ. Community flux balance analysis for microbial consortia at balanced growth. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64567.
15. Harcombe WR, Riehl WJ, Dukovski I, Granger BR, Betts A, Lang AH, et al. Metabolic resource allocation in individual microbes determines ecosystem interactions and spatial dynamics. Cell Rep. 2014;7(4):1104-15.
16. Freilich S, Zarecki R, Eilam O, Segal ES, Henry CS, Kupiec M, et al. Competitive and cooperative metabolic interactions in bacterial communities. Nat Commun. 2011;2:589.
17. Chiu HC, Levy R, Borenstein E. Emergent biosynthetic capacity in simple microbial communities. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10(7):e1003695.
18. Taffs R, Aston JE, Brileya K, Jay Z, Klatt CG, McGlynn S, et al. In silico approaches to study mass and energy flows in microbial consortia: a syntrophic case study. BMC Syst Biol. 2009;3(1):114.
19. Zhuang K, Izallalen M, Mouser P, Richter H, Risso C, Mahadevan R, et al. Genome-scale dynamic modeling of the competition between Rhodoferax and Geobacter in anoxic subsurface environments. ISME J. 2011;5(2):305-16.
20. Hanly TJ, Henson MA. Dynamic flux balance modeling of microbial co-cultures for efficient batch fermentation of glucose and xylose mixtures. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011;108(2):376-85.
21. Zomorrodi AR, Islam MM, Maranas CD. d-OptCom: dynamic multi-level and multi-objective metabolic modeling of microbial communities. ACS Synth Biol. 2014;3(4):247-57.
22. McInerney MJ, Bryant MP. Basic principles of bioconversions in anaerobic digestion and methanogenesis. In: Biomass conversion processes for energy and fuels. London: Springer; 1981. p. 277-96.
23. Schink B. Energetics of syntrophic cooperation in methanogenic degradation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997;61(2):262-80.
24. Batstone DJ, Keller J, Angelidaki I, Kalyuzhnyi S, Pavlostathis S, Rozzi A, et al. The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1(ADM 1). Water Sci Technol. 2002;45(10):65-73.
25. Thauer RK, Kaster AK, Seedorf H, Buckel W, Hedderich R. Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6(8):579-91.
26. Jones WJ, Paynter M, Gupta R. Characterization of Methanococcus maripaludis sp. nov., a new methanogen isolated from salt marsh sediment. Arch Microbiol. 1983;135(2):91-7.
27. Kanehisa M, Araki M, Goto S, Hattori M, Hirakawa M, Itoh M, et al. KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(Database issue):D480-4.
28. Bryant MP, Campbell LL, Reddy CA, Crabill MR. Growth of Desulfovibrio in lactate or ethanol media low in sulfate in association with H2-utilizing methanogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977;33(5):1162-9.
29. Badziong W, Thauer RK. Growth yields and growth rates of Desulfovibrio vulgaris (Marburg) growing on hydrogen plus sulfate and hydrogen plus thiosulfate as the sole energy sources. Arch Microbiol. 1978;117(2):209-14.
30. Tang Y, Pingitore F, Mukhopadhyay A, Phan R, Hazen TC, Keasling JD. Pathway confirmation and flux analysis of central metabolic pathways in Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and Fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. J Appl Bacteriol. 2007;189(3):940-9.
31. Tatton MJ, Archer DB, Powell GE, Parker ML. Methanogenesis from ethanol by defined mixed continuous cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989;55(2):440-5.
32. Kremer DR, Nienhuiskuiper HE, Hansen TA. Ethanol dissimilation in Desulfovibrio. Arch Microbiol. 1988;150(6):552-7.
33. Pereira IA, Ramos AR, Grein F, Marques MC, da Silva SM, Venceslau SS. A comparative genomic analysis of energy metabolism in sulfate reducing bacteria and archaea. Front Microbiol. 2011;2:69.