How best to obtain consent to thrombolysis

Neurology

Volumn 86, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 1045-1052

  Gong, Jingjing ^a   Zhang, Yan ^b   Feng, Jun ^a   Zhang, Weiwei ^a   Yin, Weimin ^a   Wu, Xinhuai ^a   Hou, Yanhong ^c   Huang, Yonghua ^a   Liu, Hongyun ^d   Miao, Danmin ^e  

^a CHINESE PLA GENERAL HOSPITAL   (China)

^b Air force aviation medicine research institute   (China)

^c 309TH HOSPITAL OF PLA   (China)

^d BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^e FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LIFESPAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MARRIAGE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF CONCEPT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; MALE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; STROKE;

FIBRINOLYTIC AGENT;

DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FIBRINOLYTIC AGENTS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; STROKE; THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY;

EID: 84961247149     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: 1526632X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002434     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, et al. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke: The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS). JAMA 1995;274:1017-1025
2. Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke: The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1581-1587
3. Emberson J, Lees KR, LyDen P, et al. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet 2014;384:1929-1935
4. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1317-1329
5. Lees KR, Bluhmki E, von Kummer R, et al. Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an updated pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials. Lancet 2010;375:1695-1703
6. El Khoury R, Jung R, Nanda A, et al. Overview of key factors in improving access to acute stroke care. Neurology 2012;79:S26-S34
7. Wang Y, Liao X, Zhao X, et al. Using recombinant tissue plasminogen activator to treat acute ischemic stroke in China: analysis of the results from the Chinese National Stroke Registry (CNSR). Stroke 2011;42:1658-1664
8. Jasper JD, Goel R, Einarson A, Gallo M, Koren G. Effects of framing on teratogenic risk perception in pregnant women. Lancet 2001;358:1237-1238
9. Reyna VF, Nelson WL, Han PK, Dieckmann NF. How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychol Bull 2009;135:943-973
10. Frith CD, Singer T. The role of social cognition in decision making. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2008; 363:3875-3886
11. Moxey A, O'Connell D, McGettigan P, Henry D. Describing treatment effects to patients. J Gen Intern Med 2003;18:948-959
12. Gong J, Zhang Y, Yang Z, Huang Y, Feng J, Zhang W. The framing effect in medical decision-making: a review of the literature. Psychol Health Med 2013;18:645-653
13. Lipkus IM, Samsa G, Rimer BK. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med Decis Making 2001;21:37-44
14. Jalenques I, Galland F, Malet L, et al. Quality of life in adults with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. BMC Psychiatry 2012;12:109
15. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981;211:453-458
16. Haward MF, Murphy RO, Lorenz JM. Message framing and perinatal decisions. Pediatrics 2008;122:109-118
17. Wong YN, Egleston BL, Sachdeva K, et al. Cancer patients' trade-offs among efficacy, toxicity, and out-of-pocket cost in the curative and noncurative setting. Med Care 2013;51: 838-845
18. Sutfin EL, Reboussin BA, McCoy TP, Wolfson M. Are college student smokers really a homogeneous group?. A latent class analysis of college student smokers. Nicotine Tob Res 2009;11:444-454
19. McCrae R, Costa T Jr, Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User's Guide, Seventh Edition (1998-2012). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén
20. Lo Y, Mendell NR, Rubin DB. Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika 2001;88:767-778
21. Garcia-Retamero R, Galesic M. How to reduce the effect of framing on messages about health. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:1323-1329
22. Latimer AE, Rivers SE, Rench TA, et al. A field experiment testing the utility of regulatory fit messages for promoting physical activity. J Exp Soc Psychol 2008;44:826-832
23. Apanovitch AM, McCarthy D, Salovey P. Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women. Health Psychol 2003;22:60-67
24. Schneider S, Levin I, Gaeth G. The three faces of framing a typology of framing effects. Presented at the 36th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society. Los Angeles; 1995
25. Garcia-Retamero R, Galesic M. Using plausible group sizes to communicate information about medical risks. Patient Educ Couns 2011;84:245-250
26. Rothman AJ, Salovey P. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychol Bull 1997;121:3-19
27. Akl EA, Oxman AD, Herrin J, et al. Framing of health information messages. Cochrane Database Syst 2011: CD006777
28. McNeil BJ, Pauker SG, Sox HC Jr, Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med 1982;306:1259-1262
29. Levin IP, Schneider SL, Gaeth GJ. All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1998;76:149-188
30. Wang XT. Framing effects: dynamics and task domains. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1996;68:145-157
31. Almashat S, Ayotte B, Edelstein B, Margrett J. Framing effect debiasing in medical decision making. Patient Educ Couns 2008;71:102-107
32. Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W, Kurz-Milcke E, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S.Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics Psychol Sci Public Interest 2007 8 53-96
33. Huang Y, Wang L. Sex differences in framing effects across task domain. Pers Individ Dif 2010;48:649-653
34. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med 1999;49: 651-661
35. Schattner A, Tal M. Truth telling and patient autonomy: the patient's point of view. Am J Med 2002;113:66-69
36. Schattner A. Shared decision making: an alternative view. Mayo Clinic Proc 2014;89:276