Soft tissue deformation for surgical simulation: a position-based dynamics approach

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 919-928

  Camara, Mafalda ^a   Mayer, Erik ^a   Darzi, Ara ^a   Pratt, Philip ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biomechanical modelling; Position based dynamics; Robot assisted partial nephrectomy; Soft tissue deformation; Ultrasound simulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; NONHUMAN; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SIMULATION; SOFT TISSUE DEFECT; SURGICAL APPROACH; ULTRASOUND; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECHOGRAPHY; IMAGE PROCESSING; KIDNEY; NEPHRECTOMY; PIG; PROCEDURES; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION STUDY; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KIDNEY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEPHRECTOMY; SWINE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 84961215944     PISSN: 18616410     EISSN: 18616429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-016-1373-8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Zevin B, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP (2014) Surgical simulation in 2013: why is it still not the standard in surgical training? J Am Coll Surg 218(2):294–301
2. Isotani S, Shimoyama H, Yokota I, China T, Hisasue S, Ide H, Muto S, Yamaguchi R, Ukimura O, Horie S (2015) Feasibility and accuracy of computational robot-assisted partial nephrectomy planning by virtual partial nephrectomy analysis. Int J Urol 22(5):439–446
3. Makiyama K, Nagasaka M, Inuiya T, Takanami K, Ogata M, Kubota Y (2012) Development of a patient-specific simulator for laparoscopic renal surgery. Int J Urol 19(9):829–835
4. Figueroa-Garcia I, Peyrat J-M, Hamarneh G, Abugharbieh R (2014) Biomechanical kidney model for predicting tumor displacement in the presence of external pressure load. In: 2014 IEEE 11th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI). IEEE, pp 810–813
5. Chatelain P, Krupa A, Navab N (2015) 3D ultrasound-guided robotic steering of a flexible needle via visual servoing. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA’15
6. Goksel O, Salcudean SE (2009) B-mode ultrasound image simulation in deformable 3-D medium. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28(11):1657–1669
7. Mehrdad S, Seyed-Ahmad A, Raphael P, Nassir N, Wolfgang W (2015) Patient-specific 3D ultrasound simulation based on convolutional ray-tracing and appearance optimization. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI 2015. Springer, pp 510–518
8. Nealen A, Müller M, Keiser R, Boxerman E Carlson M (2006) Physically based deformable models in computer graphics. In: Computer graphics forum, vol 25. Wiley Online Library, pp 809–836
9. Bender J, Müller M, Otaduy MA, Teschner M, Macklin M (2014) A survey on position-based simulation methods in computer graphics. In: Computer graphics forum, vol 33. Wiley Online Library, pp 228–251
10. Müller M, Heidelberger B, Hennix M, Ratcliff J (2007) Position based dynamics. J Vis Commun Image Represent 18(2):109–118
11. Kubiak B, Pietroni N, Ganovelli F, Fratarcangeli M (2007) A robust method for real-time thread simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology. ACM, pp 85–88
12. Wang Y, Xiong Y, Xu K, Tan K, Guo G (2006) A mass-spring model for surface mesh deformation based on shape matching. In: GRAPHITE, vol 6, pp 375–380
13. Bender J, Koschier D, Charrier P, Weber D (2014) Position-based simulation of continuous materials. Comput Graph 44:1–10
14. Hughes-Hallett A, Pratt P, Mayer E, Di Marco A, Yang G-Z, Vale J, Darzi A (2014) Intraoperative ultrasound overlay in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: first clinical experience. Eur Urol 3(65):671–672
15. NVIDIA Gameworks. Nvidia FleX. https://developer.nvidia.com/flex
16. Macklin M, Müller M, Chentanez N, Kim T-Y (2014) Unified particle physics for real-time applications. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 33(4):153
17. Müller M, Heidelberger B, Teschner M, Gross M (2005) Meshless deformations based on shape matching. In: ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol 24. ACM, pp 471–478
18. Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, Smith RG, Ho S, Gee JC, Gerig G (2006) User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31(3):1116–1128
19. Visual Computing Lab ISTI CNR. Meshlab. http://meshlab.sourceforge.net/
20. Sastry SP, Kim J, Shontz SM, Craven BA, Lynch FC, Manning KB, Panitanarak T (2013) Patient-specific model generation and simulation for pre-operative surgical guidance for pulmonary embolism treatment. In: Image-based geometric modeling and mesh generation. Springer, pp 223–249
21. Kavan L (2014) Part I: direct skinning methods and deformation primitives. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2014 course—skinning: real-time shape deformation, pp 1–11
22. Pop M, Davidson SRH, Gertner M, Jewett MlAS, Sherar MlD, Kolios MC (2010) A theoretical model for RF ablation of kidney tissue and its experimental validation. In: Biomedical simulation. Springer, pp 119–129
23. Snedeker JG, Barbezat M, Niederer P, Schmidlin FR, Farshad M (2005) Strain energy density as a rupture criterion for the kidney: impact tests on porcine organs, finite element simulation, and a baseline comparison between human and porcine tissues. J Biomech 38(5):993–1001
24. Snedeker JG, Niederer P, Schmidlin FR, Farshad M, Demetropoulos CK, Lee JB, Yang KH (2005) Strain-rate dependent material properties of the porcine and human kidney capsule. J Biomech 38(5):1011–1021
25. Miller K, Jia L (2013) On the prospect of patient-specific biomechanics without patient-specific properties of tissues. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 27:154–166