Development of a patient-specific simulator for laparoscopic renal surgery

International Journal of Urology

Volumn 19, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 829-835

  Makiyama, Kazuhide ^a   Nagasaka, Manabu ^b   Inuiya, Toru ^b   Takanami, Kentaro ^b   Ogata, Masato ^b   Kubota, Yoshinobu ^a  

^a YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Mitsubishi Precision   (Japan)

Author keywords

Education; Kidney; Laparoscopic surgery; Patient specific; Simulator

Indexed keywords

ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; KIDNEY SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; PATIENT CODING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATOR; SURGEON; TROCAR;

CASE MANAGEMENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ENDOSCOPES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KIDNEY; LAPAROSCOPY; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; TEACHING; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84865543002     PISSN: 09198172     EISSN: 14422042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03053.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Brewin J, Nedas T, Challacombe B etal. Face, content and construct validation of the first virtual reality laparoscopic nephrectomy simulator. BJU Int. 2010; 106: 850-4.
2. Wijn RP, Persoon MC, Schout BM etal. Virtual reality laparoscopic nephrectomy simulator is lacking in construct validity. J. Endourol. 2010; 24: 117-22.
3. Rusinek H, Boykov Y, Kaur M etal. Performance of an automated segmentation algorithm for 3D MR renography. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007; 57: 1159-67.
4. Shimai H, Yokota H, Nakamura S etal. Extraction from bioloical volume data of a region of interest with non-uniform intensity. Proceedings of SPIE 6051 Optomechatronic Technologies 2005; 6051: 1-3.
5. Wignall GR, Denstedt JD, Preminger GM etal. Surgical simulation: a urological perspective. J. Urol. 2008; 179: 1690-9.
6. Aggarwal R, Darzi A. From scalpel to simulator: a surgical journey. Surgery 2009; 145: 1-4.
7. Scott DJ, Dunnington GL. The new ACS/APDS Skills Curriculum: moving the learning curve out of the operating room. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2008; 12: 213-21.
8. Matsuda T, Ono Y, Terachi T etal. The Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System in urological laparoscopy: a novel system in Japan. J. Urol. 2006; 176: 2168-72.
9. Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery. Guideline for performing endoscopi surgery. Jpn. Soc. Endosc. Surg. 1997; 2: 7-7.
10. Miyajima A, Hasegawa M, Takeda T etal. How do young residents practice laparoscopic surgical skills? Urology 2010; 76: 352-6.
11. Vlaovic PD, Sargent ER, Boker JR etal. Immediate impact of an intensive one-week laparoscopy training program on laparoscopic skills among postgraduate urologists. JSLS 2008; 12: 1-8.
12. Le CQ, Lightner DJ, VanderLei L etal. The current role of medical simulation in American urological residency training programs: an assessment by program directors. J. Urol. 2007; 177: 288-91.
13. Korndorffer JR Jr, Stefanidis D, Scott DJ. Laparoscopic skills laboratories: current assessment and a call for resident training standerds. Am. J. Surg. 2006; 191: 17-22.
14. Fried GM, Derossis AM, Bothwell J etal. Comparison of laparoscopic performance in vivo with performance measured in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg. Endosc. 1999; 13: 1077-81.
15. Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV etal. Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2000; 191: 272-83.
16. Traxer O, Gettman MT, Napper CA etal. The impact of intense laparoscopic skills training on the operative performance of urology residents. J. Urol. 2001; 166: 1658-61.
17. Seymour NE. VR to OR: a review of the evidence that virtual reality simulation improves operating room performance. World J. Surg. 2008; 32: 182-8.
18. Aggarwal R, Ward J, Balasundaram I etal. Proving the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation for training in laparoscopic surgery. Ann. Surg. 2007; 246: 771-9.
19. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J etal. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br. J. Surg. 2004; 91: 146-50.
20. Haque S, Srinivasan S. A meta-analysis of the training effectiveness of virtual reality surgical simulators. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2006; 10: 51-8.
21. Thijssen AS, Schijven MP. Contemporary virtual reality laparoscopy simulators: quicksand or solid grounds for assessing surgical trainees? Am. J. Surg. 2010; 199: 529-41.
22. 22da Cruz JA, Sandy NS, Passerotti CC etal. Does training laparoscopic skills in a virtual reality simulator improve surgical performance? J. Endourol. 2010; 24: 1845-9.
23. Salkini MW, Doarn CR, Kiehl N etal. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic training using the LapMentor II. J. Endourol. 2010; 24: 99-102.
24. st century. Arch. Surg. 2000; 135: 786-92.
25. Westebring-van der Putten EP, Goossens RH, Jakimowicz JJ etal. Haptics in minimally invasive surgery: a review. Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Technol. 2008; 17: 3-16.
26. Panait L, Akkary E, Bell RL etal. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. J. Surg. Res. 2009; 156: 312-16.
27. Thompson JR, Leonard AC, Doarn CR etal. Limited value of haptics in virtual reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy training. Surg. Endosc. 2011; 25: 1107-14.