Transforming power/knowledge apparatuses: the smart grid in the German energy transition

Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 262-284

  Lösch, Andreas ^a   Schneider, Christoph ^a  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

energy transition; power knowledge dispositif apparatus; real life experiments; smart grid; sociology of expectations; sociotechnical systems transitions; vision assessment

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; DECENTRALIZATION; KNOWLEDGE; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; POLITICAL INTEGRATION; POLITICAL POWER;

GERMANY;

EID: 84961210789     PISSN: 13511610     EISSN: 14698412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2016.1154783     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. B.Adam, and C.Groves. 2007. Future Matters:Action, Knowledge, Ethics. Leiden:Brill.
2. BAUM Consult GmbH. 2012. Smart Energy Made in Germany Zwischenergebnisse der E-Energy-Modellprojekte auf dem Weg zum Internet der Energie. M?:B.A.U.M. Consult GmbH.
3. J.Beniger, [1986] 2009. The Control Revolution:Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
4. M.Birnbaum, 2011. “Germany's’ Make-or-Break’ Energy Experiment.” The Washington Post, June 10. http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/germanys-make-or-break-energy-experiment/2011/06/06/AGr2RLOH_story.html.
5. BMU/BMWi. 2011. The Federal Government's Energy Concept of 2010 and the Transformation of the Energy System of 2011. Munich:Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology and Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety.
6. BMWi. 2014. Smart Energy Made in Germany. Erkenntnisse zum Aufbau und zur Nutzung intelligenter Energiesysteme im Rahmen der Energiewende. Berlin:Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie.
7. K.Böhle, and K.Bopp. 2014. “What a Vision:The Artificial Companion; A Piece of Vision Assessment Including an Expert Survey.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 10 (1):155–186.
8. M.Borup, N.Brown, K.Konrad, and H.Van Lente. 2006. “The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4):285–298. doi:10.1080/09537320600777002
9. N.Brown, B.Rappert, and A.Webster, eds. 2000. Contested Futures:A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science. Farnham:Ashgate.
10. A.Bührmann, and W.Schneider, 2008. Vom Diskurs zum Dispositiv. Eine Einführung in die Dispositivanalyse. Bielefeld:transcript.
11. C.Büscher, and J.Schippl. 2013. “Die Transformation der Energieversorgung:Einheit und Differenz soziotechnischer Systeme.” Technikfolgenabschätzung - Theorie und Praxis 22 (2):11–19.
12. C.Büscher, and P.Sumpf. 2015. “‘Trust’ and ‘Confidence’ as Socio-Technical Problems in the Transformation of Energy Systems.” Energy, Sustainability and Society 5 (1):34. doi:10.1186/s13705-015-0063-7.
13. D.Coats, 2014. “What Obama Could Learn from Germany's Failed Experiment with Green Energy.” FoxNews.com, June 5. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/06/05/what-obama-could-learn-from-germany-failed-experiment-with-green-energy.html.
14. C.F.Covrig, M.Ardelean, J.Vasiljevska, A.Mengolini, G.Fulli, and E.Amoiralis. 2014. Smart Grid Projects Outlook 2014. EUR - Scientific and Technical Research Series. Luxembourg:Office of the European Union.
15. M.Dierkes, U.Hoffman, and L.Marz. 1996. Visions of Technology. Social and Institutional Factors Shaping the Development of New Technologies. Frankfurt am Main:Campus.
16. F.Engels, and A.V.Münch. 2015. “The Micro Smart Grid as a Materialised Imaginary Within the German Energy Transition.” Energy Research & Social Science 9:35–42. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.024.
17. A.Ferrari, C.Coenen, and A.Grunwald. 2012. “Visions and Ethics in Current Discourse on Human Enhancement.” Nanoethics 6 (3):215–229. doi:10.1007/s11569-012-0155-1
18. M.Foucault, 1977. Discipline and Punish:The Birth of the Prison. New York:Pantheon.
19. M.Foucault, 1978. The History of Sexuality:An Introduction. Vol. 1. New York:Vintage.
20. M.Foucault, 1980. “Confession of Flesh.” In Power/Knowledge:Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, edited by C. Gordon, 194–228. New York:Pantheon.
21. F.W.Geels, 2005. Technological Transitions and System Innovations. A Co-Evolutionary and Socio-Technical Analysis. Cheltenham:Eigar.
22. M.Goulden, B.Bedwell, S.Rennick-Egglestone, T.Rodden, and A.Spence. 2014. “Smart Grids, Smart Users? The Role of the User in Demand Side Management.” Energy Research & Social Science 2:21–29. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.04.008.
23. M.Gross, and R.Mautz. 2015. Renewable Energies. London:Routledge.
24. A.Grunwald, 2012. Technikzukünfte als Medium von Zukunftsdebatten und Technikgestaltung. Karlsruhe:KIT Scientific.
25. A.Grunwald, 2014. “The Hermeneutic Side of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (3):274–291. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.968437
26. E.Hörl,. 2013. “The Artificial Intelligence of Sense:The History of Sense and Technology after Jean-Luc Nancy (By Way of Gilbert Simondon).” Parrhesia 17:11–24.
27. T.P.Hughes, 1983. Networks of Power:Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.
28. Jasanoff, S., and S.-H. Kim. 2009. “Containing the Atom:Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea.” Minerva 47 (2):119–146.
29. C.Katzeff, and J.Wangel. 2015. “Social Practices, Households, and Design in the Smart Grid.” In ICT Innovations for Sustainability. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 310, edited by L.M.Hilty and B.Aebischer, 351–365. Berlin:Springer International. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-09228-7_21.
30. R.Keller,. 2011. “The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD).” Human Studies 34:43–65. doi:10.1007/s10746-011-9175-z
31. K.Konrad,. 2006. “The Social Dynamics of Expectations:The Interaction of Collective and Actor-Specific Expectations on Electronic Commerce and Interactive Television.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3/4):429–444. doi:10.1080/09537320600777192
32. K.Kourtit, and P.Nijkamp. 2012. “Smart Cities in the Innovation Age.” Innovation:The European Journal of Social Science Research 25 (2):93–95. doi:10.1080/13511610.2012.660331.
33. W.Krohn,. 2007a. “Nature, Technology, and the Acknowledgment of Waste.” Nature & Culture 2 (2):139–160. doi:10.3167/nc.2007.020203
34. W.Krohn,. 2007b. “Realexperimente–Die Modernisierung der ‘offenen Gesellschaft’ durch experimentelle Forschung.” Erwägen Wissen Ethik 18 (3):419–421.
35. W.Krohn, and J.Weyer. 1994. “Society as a Laboratory:The Social Risks of Experimental Research.” Science and Public Policy 21 (3):173–183.
36. B.Latour,. 2011. “From Multiculturalism to Multinaturalism:What Rules of Method for the New Socio-Scientific Experiments?” Nature and Culture 6 (1):1–17. doi:10.3167/nc.2011.060101
37. A.Lösch,. 2006a. “Anticipating the Futures of Nanotechnology:Visionary Images as Means of Communication.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3/4):393–409. doi:10.1080/09537320600777168
38. A.Lösch,. 2006b. “Means of Communicating Innovations; a Case Study for the Analysis and Assessment of Nanotechnology's Futuristic Visions.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 2:103–125.
39. A.Lösch, 2010. “Visual Dynamics:The Defuturisation of the Popular “Nano-Discourse” as an Effect of Increasing Economisation.” In Governing Future Technologies:Nanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime, edited by M.Kaiser, M.Kurath, S.Maasen, and C.Rehmann-Sutter, 89–108. Berlin:Springer.
40. A.Lösch, 2013. “Vision Assessment zu Human-Enhancement-Technologien; Konzeptionelle Überlegungen zu einer Analytik von Visionen im Kontext gesellschaftlicher Kommunikationsprozesse.” Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis 22 (1):9–16.
41. K.Manderscheid, 2014. “The Movement Problem, the Car and Future Mobility Regimes:Automobility as Dispositif and Mode of Regulation.” Mobilities 9 (4):604–626. doi:10.1080/17450101.2014.961257.
42. W.P.McCray, 2012. The Visioneers:How a Group of Elite Scientists Pursued Space Colonies, Nanotechnologies, and a Limitless Future. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
43. C.A.Miller, A.Iles, and C.Jones. 2013. “The Social Dimensions of Energy Transitions.” Science as Culture 22 (2):135–148. doi:10.1080/09505431.2013.786989
44. A.Nordmann,. 2013. “Visioneering Assessment:On the Construction of Tunnel Visions for Technovisionary Research and Policy.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 9 (2):89–94.
45. S.Nyborg, and I.Røpke. 2013. “Constructing Users in the Smart Grid—insights from the Danish eFlex Project.” Energy Efficiency 6 (4):655–670. doi:10.1007/s12053-013-9210-1.
46. D.Nye,. 1990. Consuming Power:A Social History of American Energies. Cambridge:MIT Press.
47. C.Orwat,. 2011. “Systemic Risks in the Electric Power Infrastructure?” Technikfolgenabschätzung - Theorie und Praxis 20 (3):47–55.
48. P.Rabinow, and N.Rose. 2003. “Foucault Today.” In The Essential Foucault:Selections from the Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, edited by P.Rabinow and N.Rose, vii–xxxvi. New York:New Press.
49. S.D.Ramchurn, P.Vytelingum, A.Rogers, and N.R.Jennings. 2012. “Putting the ‘Smarts’ into the Smart Grid:A Grand Challenge for Artificial Intelligence.” Communications of the acm 55 (4):86–97. doi:10.1145/2133806.2133825.
50. L.Schick, and C.Gad. 2015. “Flexible and Inflexible Energy Engagements—A Study of the Danish Smart Grid Strategy.” Energy Research & Social Science, no. 9 (September):51–59. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.013.
51. L.Schick, and B.R.Winthereik. 2013. “Innovating Relations - or Why Smart Grid is Not too Complex for the Public.” Science & Technology Studies 26 (3):82–102.
52. C.Schneider, and A.Lösch. 2015. “What About your Futures, Technology Assessment? An Essay on How to Take the Visions of TA Seriously, Motivated by the PACITA Conference.” Technikfolgenabschätzung - Theorie und Praxis 2. http://www.tatup-journal.de/downloads/2015/tatup152_sclo15a.pdf.
53. T.M.Skjølsvold, and M.Ryghaug. 2015. “Embedding Smart Energy Technology in Built Environments:A Comparative Study of Four Smart Grid Demonstration Projects.” Indoor and Built Environment 24 (7):878–890. doi:10.1177/1420326X15596210.
54. P.Späth, and H.Rohracher. 2010. “‘Energy Regions’:The Transformative Power of Regional Discourses on Socio-Technical Futures.” Research Policy, Special Section on Innovation and Sustainability Transitions 39 (4):449–458.
55. N.Srnicek, and A.Williams. 2015. Inventing the Future:Postcapitalism and a World Without Work. London:Verso.
56. D.Talbot, 2012. “The Great German Energy Experiment.” Technology Review 115 (4):50–55.
57. N.J.Thrift, 2011. “Lifeworld Inc.:and What to do About it.” Environment and Planning D:Society and Space 29 (1):5–26. doi:10.1068/d0310
58. W.Throndsen, and M.Ryghaug. 2015. “Material Participation and the Smart Grid:Exploring Different Modes of Articulation.” Energy Research & Social Science, no, 9 (September):157–165. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.012.
59. D.Tyfield, 2014. “Putting the Power in ‘Socio-Technical Regimes’ – E-Mobility Transition in China as Political Process.” Mobilities 9 (4):585–603. doi:10.1080/17450101.2014.961262.
60. H.Van Lente,. 1993. “Promising Technology. The Dynamics of Expectations in Technological Developments.” PhD Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede.
61. G.Verbong, and D.Loorbach. eds. 2012. Governing the Energy Transition. Reality, Illusion or Necessity? New York:Routledge.
62. K.Vu, M.M.Begouic, and D.Novosel. 1997. “Grids get Smart Protection and Control.” Computer Applications in Power, IEEE 10 (4):40–44. doi:10.1109/67.625373
63. K.M.Weber, 2003. “Transforming Large Socio-technical Systems towards Sustainability:On the Role of Users and Future Visions for the Uptake of City Logistics and Combined Heat and Power Generation.” Innovation:The European Journal of Social Science Research 16 (2):155–175.
64. Quoted Interview-Partners (Anonymised)
65. (All interviews were made in spring and summer 2013)
66. Consumer Protection Association/NGO (2013) = Spokesperson of a German Consumer Protection Association
67. Economist/Academia (2013) = Economist from a German University Department
68. Energy Supply Company (2013) = Head of an Innovation Group of One of the Big German Energy Supply Companies
69. Environmental Association/NGO (2013) = Leading Expert for Renewable Energies from a German Environmental Association
70. Industry Association (2013) = Expert for Smart Grids, Smart Markets and Regulation from One of the Big Industry Associations in Germany in the Energy Sector