Making data count

Scientific Data

Volumn 2, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Kratz, John E ^a   Strasser, Carly ^b  

^a California Digital Library   (United States)

^b GORDON AND BETTY MOORE FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY;

DATA CURATION; DATASETS AS TOPIC; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84961127048     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20524463     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2015.39     Document Type: Note

References (20)

1. Priem J., Piwowar H. A., & Hemminger B. M. Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. arXiv: 1203.4745 [cs.DL] (2012
2. Pfeiffenberger H., & Carlson D. Earth System Science Data (ESSD)-A peer reviewed journal for publication of data. D-Lib Magazine 17 doi: 10.1045/january2011-pfeiffenberger (2011
3. More bang for your byte. Scientific Data 1, 140010 (2014
4. Kratz J. E., & Strasser C. Researcher perspectives on publication and peer review of data. PLoS ONE 10, e0117619 )2015
5. Kratz J. E., & Strasser C. Making Data Count survey responses. University of California, Office of the President http://www.dx.doi. org/10.5060/D8H59D (2015
6. Tenopir C., et al. Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions. PLoS ONE 6, e21101 (2011
7. Akers K. G., & Doty J. Disciplinary differences in faculty research data management practices and perspectives. International Journal of Digital Curation 8, 5-26 (2013
8. Wallis J. C., Rolando E., & Borgman C. L. If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology. PLoS ONE 8, e67332 (2013
9. Aydinoglu A. U., Suomela T., & Malone J. Data management in astrobiology: challenges and opportunities for an interdisciplinary community. Astrobiology 14, 451-461 (2014
10. Bobrow M., et al. Establishing incentives and changing cultures to support data access. Wellcome Trust http://www.wellcome.ac. uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@msh-peda/documents/web-document/wtp056495.pdf (2014
11. Costas R., Meijer I., Zahedi Z., & Wouters P. The value of research data: metrics for datasets from a cultural and technical point of view. K nowledge Exchange http://www.knowledge-exchange.info/datametrics (2013
12. Robinson-Garcia N., Jiménez-Contreras E., & Torres-Salinas D. Analyzing data citation practices according to the Data Citation Index. arXiv: 150106285 [cs] (2015
13. Sieber P. J. E., & Trumbo B. E. (Not) Giving credit where credit is due: citation of data sets. Science and Engineering Ethics 1, 11-20 (1995
14. Mooney H. Citing data sources in the social sciences: do authors do it? Learned Publishing 24, 99-108 (2011
15. Enke N., et al. The user's view on biodiversity data sharing: investigating facts of acceptance and requirements to realize a sustainable use of research data. Ecological Informatics 11, 25-33 (2012
16. Data Citation Synthesis Group. Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles. (ed. Martone M.) FORCE11 https://www.force11. org/group/joint-declaration-data-citation-principles-final (2012
17. Kafkas Ş., Kim J. H., & McEntyre J. R. Database Citation in Full Text Biomedical Articles. PLoS ONE 8, e63184 (2013
18. Ingwersen P., & Chavan V. Indicators for the Data Usage Index (DUI): an incentive for publishing primary biodiversity data through global information infrastructure. BMC Bioinformatics 12, S3 (2011
19. Katz D. S. Transitive credit as a means to address social and technological concerns stemming from citation and attribution of digital products. Journal of Open Research Software 2, e20 (2014
20. Ding Y., et al. Entitymetrics: Measuring the impact of entities. PloS ONE 8, e71416 (2013