Citing data sources in the social sciences: Do authors do it?

Learned Publishing

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 99-108

  Mooney, Hailey ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80555154788     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1087/20110204     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Henige D. 2006. Discouraging verification: citation practices across the disciplines. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 37(2): 99-119. Available at http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/scp/summary/v037/37.2henige.html (accessed 2 November 2010).
2. Donovan S.K. 2008. On accuracy in references. Learned Publishing, 21: 74-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/095315108x254494
3. Garfield, E. 1991. Bibliographic negligence: a serious transgression. The Scientist, 5(23): 14. Available at http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/11078/ (accessed 2 November 2010).
4. Ginsburg, I. 2001. The disregard syndrome: a menace to honest science? The Scientist, 15(24): 51. Available at http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/12767/ (accessed 2 November 2010).
5. Gatten, R. 2010. A case study in reference list accuracy. New Library World, 111(1/2): 16-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03074801011015658
6. Davis, H.M., and Vickery, J.N. 2007. Datasets, a shift in the currency of scholarly communication: Implications for library collections and acquisitions. Serials Review, 33(1): 26-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2006.11.004
7. Fienberg, S.E., Martin, M.E., and Straf, M.L. Sharing Research Data. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1985. p. 31.
8. Freese, J. 2007. Replication standards for quantitative social science: why not sociology? Sociological Methods Research, 36(2): 153-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124107306659
9. King, G. 2007. An introduction to the Dataverse Network as an infrastructure for data sharing. Sociological Methods & Research, 36(2): 173-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124107306660
10. Griffiths, A. 2009. The publication of research data: researcher attitudes and behaviors. International Journal of Digital Curations, 4(1): 46-56. Available at http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/artice/view/101/76 (accessed 2 November 2010).
11. Nelson, B. 2009. Empty archives. Nature, 461(7261): 160-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/461160a
12. Dodd, S.A. 1979. Bibliographic references for numeric social science data files: suggested guidelines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30(2): 77-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630300203
13. Dodd, S.A. Bibliographic references for computer files in the social sciences: a discussion paper. 1990. Available at http://people.virginia.edu/~pm9k/info/compRef.html (accessed 2 November 2010).
14. Schneider, J. 2006, Spring. Why we need a data citation standard: lessons learned from compiling ICPSR's Bibliography of Data-Related Literature. ICPSR Bulletin, XXVI(2): 9-12. Available at http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/files/ICPSR/org/publications/bulletin/2006-Q1.pdf (accessed 2 November 2010).
15. Altman, M. and King, G. A proposed standard for the scholarly citation of quantitative data. Presentation at International Association for Social Science Information Services & Technology Annual Conference, May 2006. Available at http://www.iassistdata.org/downloads/G2_AltmanKing.pdf (accessed 2 November 2010).
16. Drolet, G. Basic forms of citation for statistics and data: towards an accepted standard. Presentation at International Association for Social Science Information Services & Technology Annual Conference, May 2006. Available at http://www.iassistdata.org/downloads/G2_Drolet.pdf (accessed 2 November 2010).
17. Schneider, J. Challenges and opportunities in the implementation of citation standards. Presentation at International Association for Social Science Information Services & Technology Annual Conference, May 2006. Available at http://www.iassistdata.org/downloads/G2_Schneider.pdf (accessed 2 November 2010).
18. Altman, M. and King, G. 2007. A proposed standard for the scholarly citation of quantitative data. D-Lib Magazine, 13(3/4). http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/march2007-altman
19. Dataverse Network Project. The standard. http://thedata.org/citation/standard (accessed 2 November 2010).
20. Kelly, M.C. NISO Thought Leader meeting on research data. 2008. Available at http://www.niso.org/topics/tl/NISOTLDataReportDraft.pdf (accessed 2 November 2010).
21. Green, T. We Need Publishing Standards for Datasets and Data Tables, OECD Publishing White Paper. Paris, OECD Publishing, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/603233448430
22. DataCite. http://www.datacite.org (accessed 2 November 2010).
23. Brase, J. et al. 2009. Approach for a joint global registration agency for research data. Information Services & Use, 29(1): 13-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ISU-2009-0595
24. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. Why and How Should I Cite Data? 2009. http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/support/faqs/0248 (accessed 2 November 2010).
25. Roper Center. How to Cite Roper Center Data. http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/data_access/data/how_to_cite.html (accessed 2 November 2010).
26. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. 1989, December. Bibliographic citations for ICPSR data collections. ICPSR Bulletin, X(2): 22. Available at http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/files/ICPSR/org/publications/bulletin/1989-12.pdf (accessed 3 November 2010).
27. American Sociological Association. Style Guide, 3rd edn. Washington, DC, American Sociological Association, 2007.
28. American Political Science Association, Committee on Publications, Karpowicz, P. and Yoder, S. APSA Style Manual for Political Science, rev. edn. Washington, DC: The American Political Science Association, Committee on Publications, 2006. Available at http://www.ipsonet.org/data/files/APSAStyleManual2006.pdf (accessed 3 November 2010).
29. American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th edn. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, 2010.
30. American Psychological Association. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, 3rd edn. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, 1983.
31. Sieber, J.E. and Trumbo, B.E. 1995. (Not) giving credit where credit is due: citation of data sets. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1(1): 11-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02628694
32. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. Bibliography of Data-related Literature. http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/citations/ (accessed 30 November 2010).
33. Nicolaisen, J. 2007. Citation analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41: 609-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410120
34. Camacho-Miñano, M. and Nuñez-Nickel, M. 2009. The multilayered nature of reference selection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4): 754-777. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21018
35. Kaplan, N. 1965. The norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote. American Documentation, 16(3): 179-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090160305
36. LeClere, F. 2010. Too many researchers are reluctant to share their data. Chronicle of Higher Education, 3 August. Available at http://chronicle.com/article/Too-Many-Researchers-Are/123749/ (accessed 3 November 2010).
37. Cronin, B. The Citation Process: The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication. London, Taylor Graham, 1984. Available at http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/lookupid?key=olbp40643 (accessed 3 November 2010).
38. Grafton, A. The Footnote: A Curious History, rev. edn. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1997.
39. Hauptman, R. Documentation: A History and Critique of Attribution, Commentary, Glosses, Marginalia, Notes, Bibliographies, Works-cited Lists, and Citation Indexing and Analysis. Jefferson, NC, McFarland, 2008.
40. Van de Sompel, H., Payette, S., Erickson, J., Lagoze, C., and Warner, S. 2004. Rethinking scholarly communication: building the system that scholars deserve. D-Lib Magazine, 10(9). http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/september2004-vandesompel