Why do peroxisomes associate with the cytoskeleton?

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Cell Research

Volumn 1863, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1019-1026

  Neuhaus, Alexander ^a   Eggeling, Christian ^b   Erdmann, Ralf ^c   Schliebs, Wolfgang ^c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOPHYSICS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Actin filaments; Cytoskeleton; Microtubules; Motor proteins; Peroxins; Peroxisome motility

Indexed keywords

ADAPTOR PROTEIN; DYNACTIN; DYNEIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; KINESIN; MOLECULAR MOTOR; MYOSIN; CELL RECEPTOR; INP2 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; ISOPROTEIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; MYO2 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; MYOSIN HEAVY CHAIN; MYOSIN V; PEX3 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL MOTILITY; CYTOSKELETON; MICROTUBULE; NONHUMAN; PEROXISOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; ORGANELLE BIOGENESIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSPORT AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACTIN CYTOSKELETON; BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MICROTUBULES; MYOSIN HEAVY CHAINS; MYOSIN TYPE V; ORGANELLE BIOGENESIS; PEROXISOMES; PROTEIN ISOFORMS; RECEPTORS, CYTOPLASMIC AND NUCLEAR; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84961120667     PISSN: 01674889     EISSN: 18792596     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.11.022     Document Type: Article

References (114)

1. Smith J.J., Aitchison J.D. Peroxisomes take shape. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 14:803-817.
2. Holmes K.C., Popp D., Gebhard W., Kabsch W. Atomic model of the actin filament. Nature 1990, 347:44-49.
3. Kabsch W., Mannherz H.G., Suck D., Pai E.F., Holmes K.C. Atomic structure of the actin:DNase I complex. Nature 1990, 347:37-44.
4. Mitchison T.J., Cramer L.P. Actin-based cell motility and cell locomotion. Cell 1996, 84:371-379.
5. Williamson R.E. Organelle movements along actin filaments and microtubules. Plant Physiol. 1986, 82:631-634.
6. Vale R.D. Myosin V motor proteins: marching stepwise towards a mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 163:445-450.
7. Richards T.A., Cavalier-Smith T. Myosin domain evolution and the primary divergence of eukaryotes. Nature 2005, 436:1113-1118.
8. Foth B.J., Goedecke M.C., Soldati D. New insights into myosin evolution and classification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103:3681-3686.
9. Sellers J.R., Veigel C. Walking with myosin V. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2006, 18:68-73.
10. Pruyne D., Legesse-Miller A., Gao L., Dong Y., Bretscher A. Mechanisms of polarized growth and organelle segregation in yeast. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2004, 20:559-591.
11. Desnos C., Huet S., Darchen F. 'Should I stay or should I go?': myosin V function in organelle trafficking. Biol. Cell. 2007, 99:411-423.
12. Desnos C., Huet S., Fanget I., Chapuis C., Bottiger C., Racine V., Sibarita J.B., Henry J.P., Darchen F. Myosin va mediates docking of secretory granules at the plasma membrane. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:10636-10645.
13. Li J.F., Nebenfuhr A. Organelle targeting of myosin XI is mediated by two globular tail subdomains with separate cargo binding sites. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:20593-20602.
14. Fagarasanu A., Rachubinski R.A. Orchestrating organelle inheritance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2007, 10:528-538.
15. Fagarasanu M., Fagarasanu A., Rachubinski R.A. Sharing the wealth: peroxisome inheritance in budding yeast. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1763:1669-1677.
16. Hoepfner D., van den Berg M., Philippsen P., Tabak H.F., Hettema E.H. A role for Vps1p, actin, and the Myo2p motor in peroxisome abundance and inheritance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 155:979-990.
17. Rossanese O.W., Reinke C.A., Bevis B.J., Hammond A.T., Sears I.B., O'Connor J., Glick B.S. A role for actin, Cdc1p, and Myo2p in the inheritance of late Golgi elements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 153:47-62.
18. Knoblach B., Sun X., Coquelle N., Fagarasanu A., Poirier R.L., Rachubinski R.A. An ER-peroxisome tether exerts peroxisome population control in yeast. EMBO J. 2013, 32:2439-2453.
19. Eves P.T., Jin Y., Brunner M., Weisman L.S. Overlap of cargo binding sites on myosin V coordinates the inheritance of diverse cargoes. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 198:69-85.
20. Takizawa P.A., Vale R.D. The myosin motor, Myo4p, binds Ash1 mRNA via the adapter protein, She3p. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000, 97:5273-5278.
21. Estrada P., Kim J., Coleman J., Walker L., Dunn B., Takizawa P., Novick P., Ferro-Novick S. Myo4p and She3p are required for cortical ER inheritance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 163:1255-1266.
22. Fagarasanu A., Mast F.D., Knoblach B., Rachubinski R.A. Molecular mechanisms of organelle inheritance: lessons from peroxisomes in yeast. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:644-654.
23. Long R.M., Gu W., Lorimer E., Singer R.H., Chartrand P. She2p is a novel RNA-binding protein that recruits the Myo4p-She3p complex to ASH1 mRNA. EMBO J. 2000, 19:6592-6601.
24. Tabb J.S., Molyneaux B.J., Cohen D.L., Kuznetsov S.A., Langford G.M. Transport of ER vesicles on actin filaments in neurons by myosin V. J. Cell Sci. 1998, 111(Pt 21):3221-3234.
25. Cheney R.E., O'Shea M.K., Heuser J.E., Coelho M.V., Wolenski J.S., Espreafico E.M., Forscher P., Larson R.E., Mooseker M.S. Brain myosin-V is a two-headed unconventional myosin with motor activity. Cell 1993, 75:13-23.
26. Altmann K., Frank M., Neumann D., Jakobs S., Westermann B. The class V myosin motor protein, Myo2, plays a major role in mitochondrial motility in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 181:119-130.
27. Langford G.M. Myosin-V, a versatile motor for short-range vesicle transport. Traffic 2002, 3:859-865.
28. Collings D.A., Harper J.D., Vaughn K.C. The association of peroxisomes with the developing cell plate in dividing onion root cells depends on actin microfilaments and myosin. Planta 2003, 218:204-216.
29. Jedd G., Chua N.H. Visualization of peroxisomes in living plant cells reveals acto-myosin-dependent cytoplasmic streaming and peroxisome budding. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43:384-392.
30. Mathur J., Mammone A., Barton K.A. Organelle extensions in plant cells. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2012, 54:851-867.
31. Fagarasanu A., Fagarasanu M., Eitzen G.A., Aitchison J.D., Rachubinski R.A. The peroxisomal membrane protein Inp2p is the peroxisome-specific receptor for the myosin V motor Myo2p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Dev. Cell 2006, 10:587-600.
32. Fagarasanu A., Mast F.D., Knoblach B., Jin Y., Brunner M.J., Logan M.R., Glover J.N., Eitzen G.A., Aitchison J.D., Weisman L.S., Rachubinski R.A. Myosin-driven peroxisome partitioning in S. cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 186:541-554.
33. Hettema E.H., Girzalsky W., van Den Berg M., Erdmann R., Distel B. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pex3p and Pex19p are required for proper localization and stability of peroxisomal membrane proteins. EMBO J. 2000, 19:223-233.
34. Otzen M., Rucktaschel R., Thoms S., Emmrich K., Krikken A.M., Erdmann R., van der Klei I.J. Pex19p contributes to peroxisome inheritance in the association of peroxisomes to Myo2p. Traffic 2012, 13:947-959.
35. Chang J., Mast F.D., Fagarasanu A., Rachubinski D.A., Eitzen G.A., Dacks J.B., Rachubinski R.A. Pex3 peroxisome biogenesis proteins function in peroxisome inheritance as class V myosin receptors. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 187:233-246.
36. Avisar D., Prokhnevsky A.I., Makarova K.S., Koonin E.V., Dolja V.V. Myosin XI-K is required for rapid trafficking of Golgi stacks, peroxisomes, and mitochondria in leaf cells of Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146:1098-1108.
37. Hashimoto K., Igarashi H., Mano S., Nishimura M., Shimmen T., Yokota E. Peroxisomal localization of a myosin XI isoform in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46:782-789.
38. Reisen D., Hanson M.R. Association of six YFP-myosin XI-tail fusions with mobile plant cell organelles. BMC Plant Biol. 2007, 7:6.
39. Sparkes I.A., Teanby N.A., Hawes C. Truncated myosin XI tail fusions inhibit peroxisome, Golgi, and mitochondrial movement in tobacco leaf epidermal cells: a genetic tool for the next generation. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59:2499-2512.
40. Peremyslov V.V., Prokhnevsky A.I., Avisar D., Dolja V.V. Two class XI myosins function in organelle trafficking and root hair development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146:1109-1116.
41. Schrader M., Burkhardt J.K., Baumgart E., Luers G., Spring H., Volkl A., Fahimi H.D. Interaction of microtubules with peroxisomes. Tubular and spherical peroxisomes in HepG2 cells and their alterations induced by microtubule-active drugs. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 1996, 69:24-35.
42. Wiemer E.A., Wenzel T., Deerinck T.J., Ellisman M.H., Subramani S. Visualization of the peroxisomal compartment in living mammalian cells: dynamic behavior and association with microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 1997, 136:71-80.
43. Rapp S., Saffrich R., Anton M., Jakle U., Ansorge W., Gorgas K., Just W.W. Microtubule-based peroxisome movement. J. Cell Sci. 1996, 109(Pt 4):837-849.
44. Kulic I.M., Brown A.E., Kim H., Kural C., Blehm B., Selvin P.R., Nelson P.C., Gelfand V.I. The role of microtubule movement in bidirectional organelle transport. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:10011-10016.
45. Thiemann M., Schrader M., Volkl A., Baumgart E., Fahimi H.D. Interaction of peroxisomes with microtubules. In vitro studies using a novel peroxisome-microtubule binding assay. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000, 267:6264-6275.
46. Schrader M., King S.J., Stroh T.A., Schroer T.A. Real time imaging reveals a peroxisomal reticulum in living cells. J. Cell Sci. 2000, 113(Pt 20):3663-3671.
47. Bharti P., Schliebs W., Schievelbusch T., Neuhaus A., David C., Kock K., Herrmann C., Meyer H.E., Wiese S., Warscheid B., Theiss C., Erdmann R. PEX14 is required for microtubule-based peroxisome motility in human cells. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124:1759-1768.
48. Bonekamp N.A., Sampaio P., de Abreu F.V., Luers G.H., Schrader M. Transient complex interactions of mammalian peroxisomes without exchange of matrix or membrane marker proteins. Traffic 2012, 13:960-978.
49. Schrader M., Thiemann M., Fahimi H.D. Peroxisomal motility and interaction with microtubules. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2003, 61:171-178.
50. Ashkin A., Schutze K., Dziedzic J.M., Euteneuer U., Schliwa M. Force generation of organelle transport measured in vivo by an infrared laser trap. Nature 1990, 348:346-348.
51. Valetti C., Wetzel D.M., Schrader M., Hasbani M.J., Gill S.R., Kreis T.E., Schroer T.A. Role of dynactin in endocytic traffic: effects of dynamitin overexpression and colocalization with CLIP-170. Mol. Biol. Cell 1999, 10:4107-4120.
52. Chuong S.D., Park N.I., Freeman M.C., Mullen R.T., Muench D.G. The peroxisomal multifunctional protein interacts with cortical microtubules in plant cells. BMC Cell Biol. 2005, 6:40.
53. Hamada T., Tominaga M., Fukaya T., Nakamura M., Nakano A., Watanabe Y., Hashimoto T., Baskin T.I. RNA processing bodies, peroxisomes, Golgi bodies, mitochondria, and endoplasmic reticulum tubule junctions frequently pause at cortical microtubules. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53:699-708.
54. Hirokawa N. Kinesin and dynein superfamily proteins and the mechanism of organelle transport. Science 1998, 279:519-526.
55. Hirokawa N., Noda Y., Tanaka Y., Niwa S. Kinesin superfamily motor proteins and intracellular transport. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10:682-696.
56. Kardon J.R., Vale R.D. Regulators of the cytoplasmic dynein motor. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10:854-865.
57. Kural C., Kim H., Syed S., Goshima G., Gelfand V.I., Selvin P.R. Kinesin and dynein move a peroxisome in vivo: a tug-of-war or coordinated movement?. Science 2005, 308:1469-1472.
58. Pfister K.K., Fisher E.M., Gibbons I.R., Hays T.S., Holzbaur E.L., McIntosh J.R., Porter M.E., Schroer T.A., Vaughan K.T., Witman G.B., King S.M., Vallee R.B. Cytoplasmic dynein nomenclature. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 171:411-413.
59. Stelter P., Kunze R., Flemming D., Hopfner D., Diepholz M., Philippsen P., Bottcher B., Hurt E. Molecular basis for the functional interaction of dynein light chain with the nuclear-pore complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9:788-796.
60. Chang J., Tower R.J., Lancaster D.L., Rachubinski R.A. Dynein light chain interaction with the peroxisomal import docking complex modulates peroxisome biogenesis in yeast. J. Cell Sci. 2013, 126:4698-4706.
61. Oeljeklaus S., Reinartz B.S., Wolf J., Wiese S., Tonillo J., Podwojski K., Kuhlmann K., Stephan C., Meyer H.E., Schliebs W., Brocard C., Erdmann R., Warscheid B. Identification of core components and transient interactors of the peroxisomal importomer by dual-track stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture analysis. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11:2567-2580.
62. Dietrich D., Seiler F., Essmann F., Dodt G. Identification of the kinesin KifC3 as a new player for positioning of peroxisomes and other organelles in mammalian cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1833:3013-3024.
63. Nguyen T., Bjorkman J., Paton B.C., Crane D.I. Failure of microtubule-mediated peroxisome division and trafficking in disorders with reduced peroxisome abundance. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119:636-645.
64. Vaughan K.T., Vallee R.B. Cytoplasmic dynein binds dynactin through a direct interaction between the intermediate chains and p150Glued. J. Cell Biol. 1995, 131:1507-1516.
65. Karki S., Holzbaur E.L. Affinity chromatography demonstrates a direct binding between cytoplasmic dynein and the dynactin complex. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270:28806-28811.
66. Deacon S.W., Serpinskaya A.S., Vaughan P.S., Lopez Fanarraga M., Vernos I., Vaughan K.T., Gelfand V.I. Dynactin is required for bidirectional organelle transport. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 160:297-301.
67. Blangy A., Arnaud L., Nigg E.A. Phosphorylation by p34cdc2 protein kinase regulates binding of the kinesin-related motor HsEg5 to the dynactin subunit p150. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272:19418-19424.
68. Burkhardt J.K., Echeverri C.J., Nilsson T., Vallee R.B. Overexpression of the dynamitin (p50) subunit of the dynactin complex disrupts dynein-dependent maintenance of membrane organelle distribution. J. Cell Biol. 1997, 139:469-484.
69. Melkonian K.A., Maier K.C., Godfrey J.E., Rodgers M., Schroer T.A. Mechanism of dynamitin-mediated disruption of dynactin. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:19355-19364.
70. Rickard J.E., Kreis T.E. CLIPs for organelle-microtubule interactions. Trends Cell Biol. 1996, 6:178-183.
71. Will G.K., Soukupova M., Hong X., Erdmann K.S., Kiel J.A., Dodt G., Kunau W.-H., Erdmann R. Identification and characterization of the human orthologue of yeast Pex14p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999, 19:2265-2277.
72. Bottger G., Barnett P., Klein A.T., Kragt A., Tabak H.F., Distel B. Saccharomyces cerevisiae PTS1 receptor Pex5p interacts with the SH3 domain of the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex13p in an unconventional, non-PXXP-related manner. Mol. Biol. Cell 2000, 11:3963-3976.
73. Meinecke M., Cizmowski C., Schliebs W., Krüger V., Beck S., Wagner R. E. R., the peroxisomal importomer constitutes a large and highly dynamic pore. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12:273-277.
74. Freitas M.O., Francisco T., Rodrigues T.A., Alencastre I.S., Pinto M.P., Grou C.P., Carvalho A.F., Fransen M., Sa-Miranda C., Azevedo J.E. PEX5 protein binds monomeric catalase blocking its tetramerization and releases it upon binding the N-terminal domain of PEX14. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:40509-40519.
75. Neufeld C., Filipp F.V., Simon B., Neuhaus A., Schuller N., David C., Kooshapur H., Madl T., Erdmann R., Schliebs W., Wilmanns M., Sattler M. Structural basis for competitive interactions of Pex14 with the import receptors Pex5 and Pex19. EMBO J. 2009, 28:745-754.
76. Theiss C., Neuhaus A., Schliebs W., Erdmann R. TubStain: a universal peptide-tool to label microtubules. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2012, 138:531-540.
77. Saidowsky J., Dodt G., Kirchberg K., Wegner A., Nastainczyk W., Kunau W.H., Schliebs W. The di-aromatic pentapeptide repeats of the human peroxisome import receptor PEX5 are separate high affinity binding sites for the peroxisomal membrane protein PEX14. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276:34524-34529.
78. Neuhaus A., Kooshapur H., Wolf J., Meyer N.H., Madl T., Saidowsky J., Hambruch E., Lazam A., Jung M., Sattler M., Schliebs W., Erdmann R. A novel Pex14 protein-interacting site of human Pex5 is critical for matrix protein import into peroxisomes. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289:437-448.
79. Kredel S., Oswald F., Nienhaus K., Deuschle K., Rocker C., Wolff M., Heilker R., Nienhaus G.U., Wiedenmann J. MRuby, a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for labeling of subcellular structures. PLoS One 2009, 4.
80. Warren G., Wickner W. Organelle inheritance. Cell 1996, 84:395-400.
81. Evangelista M., Pruyne D., Amberg D.C., Boone C., Bretscher A. Formins direct Arp2/3-independent actin filament assembly to polarize cell growth in yeast. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4:32-41.
82. Pruyne D., Evangelista M., Yang C., Bi E., Zigmond S., Bretscher A., Boone C. Role of formins in actin assembly: nucleation and barbed-end association. Science 2002, 297:612-615.
83. Sagot I., Klee S.K., Pellman D. Yeast formins regulate cell polarity by controlling the assembly of actin cables. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4:42-50.
84. Ojangu E.L., Jarve K., Paves H., Truve E. Arabidopsis thaliana myosin XIK is involved in root hair as well as trichome morphogenesis on stems and leaves. Protoplasma 2007, 230:193-202.
85. Ojangu E.L., Tanner K., Pata P., Jarve K., Holweg C.L., Truve E., Paves H. Myosins XI-K, XI-1, and XI-2 are required for development of pavement cells, trichomes, and stigmatic papillae in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12:81.
86. Prokhnevsky A.I., Peremyslov V.V., Dolja V.V. Overlapping functions of the four class XI myosins in Arabidopsis growth, root hair elongation, and organelle motility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:19744-19749.
87. Peremyslov V.V., Prokhnevsky A.I., Dolja V.V. Class XI myosins are required for development, cell expansion, and F-actin organization in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2010, 22:1883-1897.
88. Shimmen T. The sliding theory of cytoplasmic streaming: fifty years of progress. J. Plant Res. 2007, 120:31-43.
89. Williamson R.E. Organelle movements. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1993, 44:181-202.
90. Nagai R. Regulation of intracellular movements in plant cells by environmental stimuli. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1993, 145:251-310.
91. Staiger C.J., Yuan M., Valenta R., Shaw P.J., Warn R.M., Lloyd C.W. Microinjected profilin affects cytoplasmic streaming in plant cells by rapidly depolymerizing actin microfilaments. Curr. Biol. 1994, 4:215-219.
92. Bradley M.O. Microfilaments and cytoplasmic streaming: inhibition of streaming with cytochalasin. J. Cell Sci. 1973, 12:327-343.
93. Sheahan M.B., Rose R.J., McCurdy D.W. Actin-filament-dependent remodeling of the vacuole in cultured mesophyll protoplasts. Protoplasma 2007, 230:141-152.
94. Lockshon D., Surface L.E., Kerr E.O., Kaeberlein M., Kennedy B.K. The sensitivity of yeast mutants to oleic acid implicates the peroxisome and other processes in membrane function. Genetics 2007, 175:77-91.
95. Stamer K., Vogel R., Thies E., Mandelkow E., Mandelkow E.M. Tau blocks traffic of organelles, neurofilaments, and APP vesicles in neurons and enhances oxidative stress. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 156:1051-1063.
96. Nordgren M., Wang B., Apanasets O., Fransen M. Peroxisome degradation in mammals: mechanisms of action, recent advances, and perspectives. Front. Physiol. 2013, 4:145.
97. Hara-Kuge S., Fujiki Y. The peroxin Pex14p is involved in LC3-dependent degradation of mammalian peroxisomes. Exp. Cell Res. 2008, 314:3531-3541.
98. Jiang L., Hara-Kuge S., Yamashita S., Fujiki Y. Peroxin Pex14p is the key component for coordinated autophagic degradation of mammalian peroxisomes by direct binding to LC3-II. Genes Cells 2015, 20:36-49.
99. Fagarasanu M., Fagarasanu A., Tam Y.Y., Aitchison J.D., Rachubinski R.A. Inp1p is a peroxisomal membrane protein required for peroxisome inheritance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 169:765-775.
100. Munck J.M., Motley A.M., Nuttall J.M., Hettema E.H. A dual function for Pex3p in peroxisome formation and inheritance. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 187:463-471.
101. Hoepfner D., Schildknegt D., Braakman I., Philippsen P., Tabak H.F. Contribution of the endoplasmic reticulum to peroxisome formation. Cell 2005, 122:85-95.
102. Thoms S., Erdmann R. Dynamin-related proteins and Pex11 proteins in peroxisome division and proliferation. FEBS J. 2005, 272:5169-5181.
103. Manford A.G., Stefan C.J., Yuan H.L., Macgurn J.A., Emr S.D. ER-to-plasma membrane tethering proteins regulate cell signaling and ER morphology. Dev. Cell 2012, 23:1129-1140.
104. Brocard C.B., Boucher K.K., Jedeszko C., Kim P.K., Walton P.A. Requirement for microtubules and dynein motors in the earliest stages of peroxisome biogenesis. Traffic 2005, 6:386-395.
105. Koch J., Pranjic K., Huber A., Ellinger A., Hartig A., Kragler F., Brocard C. PEX11 family members are membrane elongation factors that coordinate peroxisome proliferation and maintenance. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123:3389-3400.
106. Rodriguez-Serrano M., Romero-Puertas M.C., Sparkes I., Hawes C., del Rio L.A., Sandalio L.M. Peroxisome dynamics in Arabidopsis plants under oxidative stress induced by cadmium. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2009, 47:1632-1639.
107. Sinclair A.M., Trobacher C.P., Mathur N., Greenwood J.S., Mathur J. Peroxule extension over ER-defined paths constitutes a rapid subcellular response to hydroxyl stress. Plant J. 2009, 59:231-242.
108. Lipka V., Dittgen J., Bednarek P., Bhat R., Wiermer M., Stein M., Landtag J., Brandt W., Rosahl S., Scheel D., Llorente F., Molina A., Parker J., Somerville S., Schulze-Lefert P. Pre- and postinvasion defenses both contribute to nonhost resistance in Arabidopsis. Science 2005, 310:1180-1183.
109. Koh S., Andre A., Edwards H., Ehrhardt D., Somerville S. Arabidopsis thaliana subcellular responses to compatible Erysiphe cichoracearum infections. Plant J. 2005, 44:516-529.
110. Huber C.M., Saffrich R., Ansorge W., Just W.W. Receptor-mediated regulation of peroxisomal motility in CHO and endothelial cells. EMBO J. 1999, 18:5476-5485.
111. Schollenberger L., Gronemeyer T., Huber C.M., Lay D., Wiese S., Meyer H.E., Warscheid B., Saffrich R., Peranen J., Gorgas K., Just W.W. RhoA regulates peroxisome association to microtubules and the actin cytoskeleton. PLoS One 2010, 5.
112. Chenouard N., Smal I., de Chaumont F., Maska M., Sbalzarini I.F., Gong Y., Cardinale J., Carthel C., Coraluppi S., Winter M., Cohen A.R., Godinez W.J., Rohr K., Kalaidzidis Y., Liang L., Duncan J., Shen H., Xu Y., Magnusson K.E., Jalden J., Blau H.M., Paul-Gilloteaux P., Roudot P., Kervrann C., Waharte F., Tinevez J.Y., Shorte S.L., Willemse J., Celler K., van Wezel G.P., Dan H.W., Tsai Y.S., Ortiz de Solorzano C., Olivo-Marin J.C., Meijering E. Objective comparison of particle tracking methods. Nat. Methods 2014, 11:281-289.
113. Eggeling C., Willig K.I., Sahl S.J., Hell S.W. Lens-based fluorescence nanoscopy. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2015, 48:178-243.
114. Folling J., Bossi M., Bock H., Medda R., Wurm C.A., Hein B., Jakobs S., Eggeling C., Hell S.W. Fluorescence nanoscopy by ground-state depletion and single-molecule return. Nat. Methods 2008, 5:943-945.