Ecosystem services provided by a complex coastal region: Challenges of classification and mapping

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Sousa, Lisa P ^a   Sousa, Ana I ^a   Alves, Fátima L ^a   Lillebø, Ana I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GEOGRAPHIC MAPPING; PORTUGAL; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; GEOGRAPHIC MAPPING; PORTUGAL; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84960904876     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep22782     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. European Commission. Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 (2011).
2. Maes, J. et al. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosyst. Serv. 1, 31-39 (2012).
3. Maes, J. et al. Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services in the EU: Indicators for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 (European Union, 2014).
4. Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Müller, F. & Windhorst, W. Landscapes' Capacities to Provide Ecosystem Services - a Concept for Land-Cover Based Assessments. Landsc. Online 15, 1-22 (2009).
5. Martínez-Harms, M. J. & Balvanera, P. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 8, 17-25 (2012).
6. Eigenbrod, F. et al. The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. J. Appl. Ecol. 47, 377-385 (2010).
7. Egoh, B., Drakou, E. G., Dunbar, M. B., Maes, J. & Willemen, L. Indicators for mapping ecoystem services: a review (2012).
8. Liquete, C. et al. Current status and future prospects for the assessment of marine and coastal ecosystem services: a systematic review. PLoS One 8, e67737 (2013).
9. Malinga, R., Gordon, L. J., Jewitt, G. & Lindborg, R. Mapping ecosystem services across scales and continents - A review. Ecosyst. Serv. 13, 57-63 (2015).
10. Haines-Young, R. & Potschin, M. Typology/Classification of Ecosystem Services. Open NESS Synthesis paper. 1-8 (2014).
11. Haines-young, R. & Potschin, M. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4. August-December 2012. (2013).
12. LAGOONS. D2.1b - The Ria de Aveiro Lagoon - Current knowledge base and knowledge gaps (2011).
13. Long, R. D., Charles, A. & Stephenson, R. L. Key principles of marine ecosystem-based management. Mar. Policy 57, 53-60 (2015).
14. Beck, M. W., Ferdaña, Z., Kachmar, J., Morrison, K. K. & Taylor, P. H. Best Practices for Marine Spatial Planning. The Nature Conservancy (2009).
15. Crowder, L. & Norse, E. Essential ecological insights for marine ecosystem-based management and marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 32, 772-778 (2008).
16. Gilliland, P. M. & Laffoley, D. Key elements and steps in the process of developing ecosystem-based marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 32, 787-796 (2008).
17. UNEP-WCMC. National and Regional Networks of Marine Protected Areas: A Review of Progress (2008).
18. Haines-Young, R. & Potschin, M. Methodologies for defining and assessing ecosystem services. Cent. Environ. Manag. Rep. 1-84 (2009).
19. Braat, L. C. & de Groot, R. The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosyst. Serv. 1, 4-15 (2012).
20. Häyhä, T. & Franzese, P. P. Ecosystem services assessment: A review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective. Ecol. Modell. 289, 124-132 (2014).
21. Boyd, J. & Banzhaf, S. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol. Econ. 63, 616-626 (2007).
22. Fisher, B., Turner, R. K. & Morling, P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol. Econ. 68, 643-653 (2009).
23. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A framework assessment. (Island Press, 2003).
24. TEEB. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecological and Economic Foundations. (Earthscan, 2010).
25. Turkelboom, F. et al. CICES Going Local: Ecosystem Services Classification Adapted for a Highly Populated Country. Ecosyst. Serv. Glob. Issues, Local Pract. 223-247 (2013).
26. Medcalf, K., Small, N., Finch, C. & Parker, J. Spatial framework for assessing evidence needs for operational ecosystem approaches. Rep. to JNCC (No 469) (2012).
27. Peña, L., Casado-Arzuaga, I. & Onaindia, M. Mapping recreation supply and demand using an ecological and a social evaluation approach. Ecosyst. Serv. 13, 108-118 (2015).
28. Nemec, K. T. & Raudsepp-Hearne, C. The use of geographic information systems to map and assess ecosystem services. Biodivers. Conserv. 22, 1-15 (2013).
29. Westcountry Rivers Trust Funded. Participatory Ecosystem Services Visualisation Framework: Making effective use of data & evidence to inform catchment management planning.
30. Sousa, L., Lillebø, A., Soares, J. & Alves, F. In Coastal Lagoons in Europe: Integrated Water Resource Strategies (Chapter 4) (eds. Lillebo, A., Stalnacke, P. & Gooch, G. D.) 31-38 (IWA Publishers, 2015).
31. Lillebø, A. et al. In Coastal Lagoons in Europe: Integrated Water Resource Strategies (Chapter 3) (eds. Lillebo, A., Stalnacke, P. & Gooch, G. D.) 21-29 (IWA Publishers, 2015).
32. MESH Atlantic. Predicted broad-scale EUNIS habitats - Atlantic area. Published on 10 December 2013, updated on 11th February 2014. (2014). at http://www.emodnet-seabedhabitats.eu/download.
33. Fidelis, T. & Roebeling, P. Water resources and land use planning systems in portugal-exploring better synergies through ria de aveiro. Land use policy 39, 84-95 (2014).
34. CBD. Global Open Oceans and Deep Seabed (GOODS) biogeographic classification (2009).
35. McLeod, K. L., Lubchenco, J., Palumbi, S. R. & Rosenberg, A. A. Scientific Consensus Statement on Marine Ecosystem-Based Management (2005).
36. Kindlmann, P. & Burel, F. Connectivity measures: a review. Landsc. Ecol. 23, 879-890 (2008).
37. Alves, F. L., Sousa, L. P., Almodovar, M. & Phillips, M. R. Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM): A review of progress in Portuguese implementation. Reg. Environ. Chang. 13, 1031-1042 (2013).
38. Barbier, E. B. et al. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr. 81, 169-193 (2011).
39. Maltby, E. et al. In The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report 295-360 (2011).
40. Salomidi, M. et al. Assessment of goods and services, vulnerability, and conservation status of European seabed biotopes: a stepping stone towards ecosystem-based marine spatial management. Mediteranean Mar. Sci. 13, 49-88 (2012).
41. ADAPT-MED. D2.1b - Baixo Vouga Lagunar Knowledge Database (2013).
42. Sousa, L. P., Lillebø, A. I., Gooch, G. D. & Soares, J. A. & Alves, F. L. Incorporation of Local Knowledge in the Identification of Ria de Aveiro Lagoon Ecosystem Services (Portugal). J. Coast. Res. 1051-1056 (2013).
43. AMBIECO/PLRA. Estudo da Caracterização da Qualidade Ecológica da Ria de Aveiro. Ria de Aveiro POLIS LITORAL, AMBIECO (2011).
44. Instituto Geográfico Português. Carta de Uso e Ocupação do Solo de Portugal Continental para 2007 (COS 2007) (2010).
45. MESH Atlantic. Generating broad-scale EUNIS habitat map (2013).
46. Carpenter, S. R., Bennett, E. M. & Peterson, G. D. Scenarios for ecosystem services: An overview. Ecol. Soc. 11 (2006).
47. Hou, Y., Burkhard, B. & Müller, F. Uncertainties in landscape analysis and ecosystem service assessment. J. Environ. Manage. 127, S117-S131 (2013).
48. Schulp, C. J. E., Burkhard, B., Maes, J., Van Vliet, J. & Verburg, P. H. Uncertainties in Ecosystem Service Maps: A Comparison on the European Scale. PLoS One 9, e109643 (2014).
49. Vandewalle, M. et al. Review paper on concepts of dynamic ecosystems and their services - RUBICODE (2008).
50. Daily, G. C. In Nature's Services. Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems (ed. Daily, G.) 1-10 (Island Press, 1997).
51. Costanza, R. et al. The value of the world' s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253-260 (1997).