Water resources and land use planning systems in portugal-exploring better synergies through ria de aveiro

Land Use Policy

Volumn 39, Issue , 2014, Pages 84-95

  Fidelis, Teresa ^a   Roebeling, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Land use; Planning systems; Portugal; Ria de Aveiro; Water resources

Indexed keywords

LAND USE PLANNING; PLANNING SYSTEM; RIVER BASIN; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL PLANNING; SYNERGISM; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER RESOURCE;

AVEIRO [PORTUGAL]; PORTUGAL; RIA DE AVEIRO;

EID: 84899550286     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abildtrup J., Audsley E., Fekete-Farkas M., Guipponi C., Gylling M., Rosato P., Rounsevell M. Socio-economic scenario development for the assessment of climate change impacts on agricultural land use: a pairwise comparison approach. Environ. Sci. Pol. 2006, 9:101-115.
2. Alves H., Roebeling P.C., Rocha J., Almeida P. Assessing the impact of historical urbanization evolution patterns on surface water quality - the case of the Cértima catchment in central Portugal. Proceedings TWAM 2013 International Conference & Workshops 2013, 5. http://ibtwm.web.ua.pt/congress/Proceedings/papers/Alves_Henrique.pdf.
3. Argent R.M., Grayson R.B., Podger G.M., Rahman J.M., Seaton S., Perraud J.-M. E2 - a flexible framework for catchment modeling. MODSIM 2005 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand 2005, 594-600.
4. ARHC Plano de Gestão das bacias Hidrográficas dos Rios Vouga, Mondego e Lis. Agencia Portuguesa de Ambiente, IP Ex-Administração da Região Hidrográfica do Centro 2012.
5. Arnold J.G., Srinivasan R., Muttiah R.S., Williams J.R. Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment, Part I: Model development. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1998, 34(1):73-89.
6. Carvalho T., Fidélis T. The relevance of governance models for estuary management plans. Land Use Pol. 2013, 34:134-145.
7. Becker H.A., Dewulf G. Terugkijken op toekomstonderzoek. Review of future research 1989, ISOR, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
8. Betrie G.D., Mohamed Y.A., van Griensven A., Srinivasan R. Sediment management modelling in the Blue Nile basin using SWAT model. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2011, 15:807-818.
9. Biswas A.K. Integrated water resources management: is working?. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2008, 24(1):5-22.
10. Bohnet I.C., Roebeling P.C., Williams K.J., Holzworth D., van Grieken M.E., Kroon F.J., Pert P.L., Westcott D.A., Brodie J. Landscapes Toolkit - an integrated modeling framework to assist stakeholders in exploring options for sustainable landscape development. Landsc. Ecol. 2011, 26:1179-1198.
11. Bouman B.A.M., Jansen H.G.P., Janse R.A., Hengsdijk H., Nieuwenhuyse A. Tools for Land Use Analysis on Different Scales: with Case Studies for Costa Rica 2000, 274. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
12. Breve M.A., Skaggs R.W., Parsons J.E., Gilliam J.W. DRAINMOD-N, a nitrogen model for artificially drained soils. Trans. ASAE 1997, 40(4):1067-1075.
13. Carter J.G. Spatial planning, water and the Water Framework Directive: insights from theory and practice. Geogr. J. 2007, 173(4):330-342.
14. CCDRC Plano de Ordenamento Regional do Centro 2009, Comissão de Coordenação de Desenvolvimento Regional do Centro, Coimbra.
15. Cools J., Broekx S., Vandenberghe V., Sels H., Meynaerts E., Vercaemst P., Seuntjens P., van Hulle S., Wustenberghs, Bauwens H., Huygens W.M. Coupling a hydrological water quality model and an economic optimization model to set up a cost-effective emission reduction scenario for nitrogen. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2011, 26:44-51.
16. DeFries R., Bounoua L. Consequences of land use change for ecosystem services: a future unlike the past. GeoJournal 2004, 61:345-351.
17. Dutch Government Spatial Planning Key Decision, Room for the River, approved decision 2006, Dutch Government, The Hague, Netherlands, http://www.ruimtevoorderivier.nl/media/21963/pkb%204%20approved%20decision%20h01-h086.pdf (accessed on 17th December 2013).
18. EEA EEA Report No 9/2012 European Waters - Current Status and Future Challenges 2012, European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen.
19. EEA Territorial cohesion and water management in Europe: the spatial perspective 2012, European Environmental Agency, Technical report N° 4/2012, Copenhagen.
20. Eppink F.V., van den Bergh J.C.J.M., Rietveld P. Modelling biodiversity and land use: urban growth, agriculture and nature in a wetland area. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 51:201-216.
21. EU A Blueprint to Safeguard Europe's Water Resources COM (2012) 673 final. Brussels 2012.
22. Ferraz S.F., Vettorazzi C.A., Theobald D.M., Ballester M.V.R. Landscape dynamics of Amazonian deforestation between 1984 and 2002 in central RondÔnia, Brazil: assessment and future scenarios. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2005, 204:67-83.
23. Fidélis T., Roebeling P. Water resources and spatial planning systems in Portugal - using Ria de Aveiro as a model to explore better synergies. 8th International Conference, Water Resources Management in an Interdisciplinary and Changing Context, European Water Resources Association. 26-29 April, Porto, Portugal. p 39. ISBN 978-989-95557-7-8 2013.
24. Fidelis T., Sumares D. Nature conservation and urban development control in Portugal. Eur. Environ. 2008, 18:298-311.
25. Garmendia E., Mariel P., Tamanyo I., Aizpuru I., Zabaleta A. Assessing the effect of alternative land uses in the provision of water resources: evidence and Policy implications from southern Europe. Land Use Pol. 2012, 29:761-770.
26. Global Water Partnership Integrated Water Resources Management, TAC Background Papers N° 4 2000, 22. United Nations Environment Programme, Stockholm.
27. Gunningham N., Sinclair D. Policy instrument choice and diffuse source pollution. J. Environ. Law 2005, 17(1):51-81.
28. Holman I.P., Rounsevell M.D.A., Schackley S., Harrison P.A., Nicholls R.J., Berry P.M., Audsley E. A regional, multi-sectoral and integrated assessment of the impacts of climate and socio-economic change in the UK - Part 1. Methodology. Climatic Change 2005, 71:9-41.
29. Hormann G., Horn A., Fohrer N. The evaluation of land-use options in mesoscale catchments: prospects and limitations of eco-hydrological models. Ecol. Modell. 2005, 187:3-14.
30. Iza A., Stein R. RULE - Reforming water governance 2009, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
31. Janssen S., van Ittersum M.K. Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: a review of bio-economic farm models. Agric. Syst. 2007, 94:622-636.
32. Letcher R.A., Croke B.F.W., Merritt A.J.W.S. An integrated modelling toolbox for water resources assessment and management in highland catchments: model description. Agric. Syst. 2006, 89:106-131.
33. Liefferink D., Wiering M., Uitenboogaart Y. The EU Water Framework Directive: a multi-dimensional analysis of implementation domestic impact. Land Use Pol. 2011, 28:712-722.
34. Merritt W.S., Croke B.F.W., Jakeman A.J., Letcher R.A., Perez P. A biophysical toolbox for assessment and management of land and water resources in rural catchments in Northern Thailand. Ecol. Modell. 2004, 171:279-300.
35. Mitchell B. Integrated water resource management, institutional arrangements, and land-use planning. Environ. Plann. A 2005, 37:1335-1352.
36. Molle F. River basin planning and management: the social life of a concept. Geoforum 2009, 40.
37. Montes L.V., Ruiz A.M. Environmental indicators to evaluate spatial and water planning in the coast of Granada (Spain). Land Use Pol. 2008, 25:95-105.
38. Moss T. The governance of land-use in river basins: prospects for overcoming problems of institutional interplay with the EU Water Framework Directive. Land Use Pol. 2004, 21:85-94.
39. Nunes J.P., Seixas J., Pacheco N.R. Vulnerability of water resources, vegetation productivity and soil erosion to climate change in Mediterranean watersheds. Hydrol. Process. 2008, 22:3115-3134.
40. OECD Water Governance in OECD Countries: A Multi-level Approach. OECD Studies on Water 2011, OECD Publishing, Paris. 10.1787/9789264119284-en.
41. Parker D.C., Manson S.M., Janssen A., Hoffmann M.J., Deadman P. Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land use and land cover change: a review. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2003, 93:316-340.
42. Pinto P., Cabral P., Caetano M., Alves M.F. Urban growth on coastal erosion vulnerable stretches. J. Coast. Res. 2009, 56:1567-1571.
43. Porto R.L., Porto M.F.A. Planning as a tool to deal with extreme events - the new Brazilian water resources management system. Water Int. 2002, 27(1):14-19.
44. Prosser I., Young B., Rustomji P., Moran C., Hughes A. Constructing river basin sediment budgets for the national land and water resources audit, CSIRO Land and Water, Technical Report 15/01, Canberra 2001.
45. Roebeling P.C., van Grieken M.E., Webster A.J., Biggs J., Thorburn P. Cost-effective water quality improvement in linked terrestrial and marine ecosystems: a spatial environmental-economic modelling approach. Mar. Freshwater Resour. 2009, 60:1150-1158.
46. Roebeling P.C., Rocha J., Nunes J.P., Fidélis T., Alves H., Fonseca S. Using SWAT to estimate DIN water pollution abatement cost functions in Central Portugal. Journal of Environmental Quality 2012, (in press). 10.2134/jeq2011.0400.
47. Roetter R.P., Hoanh C.T., Laborte A.G., van Keulen H., van Ittersum M.K., Dreiser C., van Diepen C.A., Ridder N., van Laar H.H. Integration of Systems Network (SysNet) tools for regional land use scenario analysis in Asia. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2005, 20:291-307.
48. Russi D., ten Brink P., Farmer A., Badura T., Coates D., Förster J., Kumar R., Davidson N. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Water and Wetlands 2013, IEEP/Ramsar Secretariat, London and Brussels/Gland.
49. Santelmann M.V., White D., Freemark K., Nassauer J.I., Eilers J.M., Vache K.B., Danielson B.J., Corry R.C., Clark M.E., Polasky S., Cruse R.M., Sifneos J., Rustigian H., Coine C., Wu J., Debinski D. Assessing alternative futures for agriculture in Iowa, USA. Landsc. Ecol. 2004, 19:357-374.
50. Saraiva G. Articulação entre a Gestão da Água e o Ordenamento do Território 2008, Ministério do Ambiente e do Ordenamento do Território, Lisboa.
51. SG Implementing the Water Environment and Water Services (Scotland) Act 2003: Promoting an Integrated Approach - A Policy Statement 2008, Scottish Government, Scotland, UK, http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2008/07/14094825/9 (accessed 17.12.13).
52. Smith L., Inman A., Cherrigton R.R. The potential of land conservation agreements for protection of water resources. Environ. Sci. Pol. 2012, 24:92-100.
53. Tropp H. Water governance: trends and need for new capacity development. Water Pol. 2008, 9(2):19-30.
54. UNEP The UN-Water Status Report on The Application of Integrated Approaches to Water Resources Management 2012, United Nations Environment Programme.
55. Van Grieken M.E., Thomas C.R., Roebeling P.C. Integrating economic drivers of social change into agricultural water quality improvement strategies. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, (in press). 10.1016/j.agee.2011.06.013.
56. Van Paassen A. Bridging the gap: computer model enhanced learning about natural resource management in Burkina Faso. Tropical Resource Management Papers N°49 2004, 219. Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
57. Venohr M., Hirt U., Hofmann J., Opits D., Gericke A., Wetzig A., Ortelback K., Natho S., Neumann F., Hürdler J. The model system MONERIS - version 2.14.1vba 2009, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Forschungsverbund, Berlin.
58. Verburg P.H., Sopeboer W., Veldkamp A., Limpiada R., Espaldon V., Mastura S.S.A. Modelling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: the CLUE-S model. Environ. Manage. 2002, 30(3):391-405.
59. Ward F. Decision support for water policy: a review of economic concepts and tools. Water Pol. 2007, 9:1-31.
60. Ward F. Economics of integrated water management. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2009, 24:948-958.
61. Wiering M., Immink I. When water management meets spatial planning: a policy-arrangement perspective. Environ. Plann. C: Govern. Pol. 2006, 24:423-438.
62. Williams J.R., Renard K.G., Dyke P.T. EPIC a new model for assessing erosion's effect on soil productivity. J. Soil Water Conserv. 1984, 38(5):381-383.