Validation of the RobotiX Mentor Robotic Surgery Simulator

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 338-346

  Whittaker, George ^a   Aydin, Abdullatif ^b   Raison, Nicholas ^b   Kum, Francesca ^c   Challacombe, Ben ^c   Khan, Muhammed Shamim ^b,c   Dasgupta, Prokar ^b,c   Ahmed, Kamran ^b,c  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c GUY'S AND ST THOMAS' NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; FACE VALIDITY; HUMAN; IMAGE GUIDED BIOPSY; MEDICAL STUDENT; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SIMULATION TRAINING; SIMULATOR; SURGICAL TRAINING; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; UNITED KINGDOM; VIRTUAL REALITY; ADULT; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; LEARNING CURVE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; STANDARDS; UROLOGIC SURGERY; UROLOGY; VALIDATION STUDY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CURRICULUM; HUMANS; LEARNING CURVE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SIMULATION TRAINING; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED KINGDOM; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; UROLOGY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84960879716     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2015.0620     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ho C, Tsakonas E, Tran K, et al. Robot-Assisted Surgery Compared with Open Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery: Clinical Effectiveness and Economic Analyses. Ottawa, Canada: CADTH, 2011.
2. Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hebert AE, Wiklund P. Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: A systematic review and metaanalysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:1-15.
3. Murphy DG, Bjartell A, Ficarra V, et al. Downsides of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Limitations and complications. Eur Urol 2010;57:735-746.
4. Balasundaram I, Aggarwal R, Darzi A. Short-phase training on a virtual reality simulator improves technical performance in tele-robotic surgery. Int J Med Robot 2008;4:139-145.
5. Abboudi H, Khan MS, Aboumarzouk O, et al. Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators-A systematic review. BJU Int 2013;111:194-205.
6. Hung AJ, Zehnder P, Patil MB, et al. Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. J Urol 2011;186:1019-1024.
7. Gavazzi A, Bahsoun AN, Van Haute W, et al. Face, content and construct validity of a virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery (SEP Robot). Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2011;93:152-156.
8. LernerMA,AyalewM, Peine WJ, SundaramCP. Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system? J Endourol 2010;24:467-472.
9. Sethi AS, Peine WJ, Mohammadi Y, Sundaram CP. Validation of a novel virtual reality robotic simulator. J Endourol 2009;23:503-508.
10. Kumar A, Smith R, Patel VR. Current status of robotic simulators in acquisition of robotic surgical skills. Curr Opin Urol 2015;25:168-174.
11. Seixas-Mikelus SA, Kesavadas T, Srimathveeravalli G, Chandrasekhar R,Wilding GE, GuruKA. Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. Urology 2010;76:357-360.
12. Seixas-Mikelus SA, Stegemann AP, Kesavadas T, et al. Content validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. BJU Int 2011;107:1130-1135.
13. Amirian M, Lindner S, Trabulsi E, Lallas C. Surgical suturing training with virtual reality simulation versus dry lab practice: An evaluation of performance improvement, content, and face validity. J Robot Surg 2014;8:329-335.
14. Sammon J, Perry A, Beaule L, Kinkead T, Clark D, Hansen M. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Learning rate analysis as an objective measure of the acquisition of surgical skill. BJU Int 2010;106:855-860.
15. Smith R, Patel V, Satava R. Fundamentals of robotic surgery: A course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14-society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development. Int J Med Robot 2014;10:379-384.
16. Aydin A, Muir GH, Graziano ME, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Validation of the GreenLight Simulator and development of a training curriculum for photoselective vaporisation of the prostate. BJU Int 2015;115:994-1003.
17. Kallstrom R, Hjertberg H, Svanvik J. Impact of virtual reality-simulated training on urology residents' performance of transurethral resection of the prostate. J Endourol 2010;24:1521-1528.
18. Burden C, Oestergaard J, Larsen CR. Integration of laparoscopic virtual-reality simulation into gynaecology training. BJOG 2011;118 Suppl 3:5-10.
19. Larsen CR, Soerensen JL, Grantcharov TP, et al. Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2009;338:b1802.
20. Aydin A, Muir GH, Graziano ME, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Validation of the GreenLight Simulator and development of a training curriculum for photoselective vaporisation of the prostate. BJU Int 2015;115:994-1003.
21. Matsumoto ED. Development and validation of a virtual reality transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic biopsy simulator. Can Urol Assoc J 2011;5:27.
22. Brewin J, Nedas T, Challacombe B, Elhage O, Keisu J, Dasgupta P. Face, content and construct validation of the first virtual reality laparoscopic nephrectomy simulator. BJU Int 2010;106:850-854.
23. Gomez PP, Willis RE, Van Sickle KR. Development of a virtual reality robotic surgical curriculum using the da Vinci Si surgical system. Surg Endosc 2015;29:2171-2179.
24. Foell K, Finelli A, Yasufuku K, et al. Robotic surgery basic skills training: Evaluation of a pilot multidisciplinary simulation-based curriculum. Can Urol Assoc J 2013;7: 430-434.
25. Bric J, Connolly M, Kastenmeier A, Goldblatt M, Gould JC. Proficiency training on a virtual reality robotic surgical skills curriculum. Surg Endosc 2014;28:3343-3348.
26. Palter VN, Grantcharov TP. Individualized deliberate practice on a virtual reality simulator improves technical performance of surgical novices in the operating room: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2014;259: 443-448.
27. Lendvay TS, Brand TC, White L, et al. Virtual reality robotic surgery warm-up improves task performance in a dry laboratory environment: A prospective randomized controlled study. J Am Coll Surg 2013;216:1181-1192.