Fundamentals of robotic surgery: A course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14-society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 379-384

  Smith, Roger ^a   Patel, Vipul ^b   Satava, Richard ^c  

^a FLORIDA HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Global Robotic Institute at Florida Hospital   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Educational curriculum; Outcomes measures; Robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

ROBOTIC SURGERY;

CURRENT GENERATION; CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; EDUCATIONAL CONTENTS; EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM; EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS; OUTCOME MEASURES; ROBOTICS CURRICULUMS; ROBOTICS SURGERY; SURGICAL ROBOTIC SYSTEM;

CURRICULA;

ARTICLE; CERTIFICATION; COGNITION; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SURGEON; SURGICAL TRAINING; TEAMWORK; ARTIFACT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; PROCEDURES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; ROBOTICS; STANDARDS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTIFACTS; CERTIFICATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ROBOTICS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84908309856     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1559     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Peters JH, Fried GM, Swanstrom LL, et al. SAGES FLS Committee. Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery 2004; 135(1): 21-27.
2. ABS news release. ABS to require ACLS, ATLS and FLS for general surgery certification; 15 August 2008: http://www.absurgery.org/default.jsp?news_newreqs [accessed 6 November 2012].
3. Zorn KC, Gautam G, Shalhav AL, et al. Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the Society of Urologic Robotic Surgeons. J Urol 2009; 182(3): 1126-1132.
4. Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, et al. Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol 2012; 187(1): 247-252.
5. Hung AJ, Patil MB, Zehnder P, et al. Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective, randomized study. J Urol 2012; 187(2): 630-637.
6. Dalkey N. The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion. RAND Corp. Memorandum (RM-5888-PR), 1969.
7. Dulan G, Rege RV, Hogg DC, et al. Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises. Surg Endosc 2012; 26(6): 1516-1521.
8. Dulan G, Rege RV, Hogg DC, et al. Content and face validity of a comprehensive robotic skills training program for general surgery, urology, and gynecology. Am J Surg 2012; 203(4): 535-539.
9. Satava RM, Smith RS, Patel VR, et al. Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery Consensus Conference I: Outcomes Measures, report from consensus conference.
10. Satava RM, Smith RS, Patel VR, et al. Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery Consensus Conference II: Curriculum Development, report from consensus conference.