Proficiency training on a virtual reality robotic surgical skills curriculum

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 28, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 3343-3348

  Bric, Justin ^a   Connolly, Michael ^a   Kastenmeier, Andrew ^a   Goldblatt, Matthew ^a   Gould, Jon C ^a  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery; Proficiency training; Robotic surgery; Simulation; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROCEDURES; ROBOTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; UNITED STATES;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; ROBOTICS; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84931374502     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3624-5     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kenngott HG, Fischer L, Nickel F, Rom J, Rassweiler J, Müller-Stich BP (2012) Status of robotic assistance—a less traumatic and more accurate minimally invasive surgery? Langenbecks Arch Surg 397(3):333–341
2. Annual report 2010 (2011) Intuitive Surgical Inc.
3. Callery MP, Strasberg SM, Soper NJ (1996) Complications of laparoscopic general surgery. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 6(2):423–444
4. Fried GM (2008) FLS assessment of competency using simulated laparoscopic tasks. J Gastrointest Surg 12(2):210–212
5. Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Fayez R, Fried GM (2010) Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room-a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 199(1):115–120
6. Connolly M, Seligman J, Page M, Kastenmeier A, Goldblatt M, Gould JC (2014) Validation of a virtual reality based robotic surgical skills curriculum. Surg Endosc 28(5):1691–1694
7. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Satava RM (2003) Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training. Surg Endosc 17:1525–1529
8. Fraser SA, Klassen DR, Feldman LS, Ghitulescu GA, Stanbridge D, Fried GM (2003) Evaluating laparoscopic skills: setting the pass/fail score for the MISTELS system. Surg Endosc 17:964–967
9. Herron DM, Marohn M, SAGES-MIRA Robotic Surgery Consensus Group (2008) A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 22(2):313–325
10. Perrenot C, Perez M, Nguyen T et al (2012) The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer is a valid assessment tool for robotic surgical skills. Surg Endosc 26:2587–2593
11. Kenney PA, Wszolek MF, Gould JJ, Libertino JA, Moinzadeh A (2009) Face, content, and construct validity of dV-Trainer: a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery. Urology 73(6):1288–1292
12. Sethi AS, Peine WJ, Mohammadi Y, Sundaram CP (2009) Validation of a novel virtual reality robotic simulator. J Endourol 23(3):503–508
13. Lendvay TS, Casale P, Sweet R, Peters C (2008) VR robotic surgery: randomized blinded study of the dV-Trainer robotic simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform 132:242–244
14. Hung AJ, Zehnder P, Patil MB et al (2011) Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. J Urol 186:1019–1025
15. Arain NA, Dulan G, Hogg DC et al (2012) Comprehensive proficiency-based inanimate training for robotic surgery: reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit. Surg Endosc 26:2740–2745
16. Dulan G, Rege RV, Hogg DC et al (2012) Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises. Surg Endosc 26:1516–1521
17. Lerner MA, Ayalew M, Peine WJ, Sundaram CP (2010) Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da vinci surgical system? J Endourol 24(3):47–72
18. Goova MT, Hollett LA, Tesfay ST et al (2008) Implementation, construct validity and benefit of a proficiency based knot-tying and suturing curriculum. J Surg Educ 65:309–315
19. Mashaud LB, Castellvi AO, Hollett LA, Hogg DC, Tesfay ST, Scott DJ (2010) Two-year skill retention and certification exam performance after fundamentals of laparoscopic skills training and proficiency maintenance. Surgery 2:194–201
20. Gauger PG, Hauge LS, Andreatta PB (2010) Laparoscopic simulation training with proficiency targets improves practice and performance of novice surgeons. Am J Surg 199:72–80
21. O’Donnell RD, Eggemeier FT (1986) Workload assessment methodology. In: Boff KR, Kaufman L, Thomas JP (eds) Handbook of perception and performance, Vol 2, vol 42., Cognitive processes and performanceNew York, Wile, pp 1–49
22. Carswell CM, Clarke D, Seales WB (2005) Assessing mental workload during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 12:80–90
23. Yurko YY, Scerbo MW, Prabhu AS, Acker CE, Stefanidis D (2010) Higher mental workload is associated with poorer laparoscopic performance as measured by the NASA-TLX Tool. Sim Healthc 5:267–271
24. Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR Jr, Markley S, Sierra R, Heniford BT, Scott DJ (2007) Closing the gap in operative performance between novices and experts: does harder mean better for laparoscopic simulator training? J Am Coll Surg 205:307–313
25. Wetzel CM, Kneebone RL, Woloshynowych M et al (2006) The effects of stress on surgical performance. Am J Surg 191:5–10
26. Tanner L (2013) Robot hot among surgeons but FDA taking a fresh look. Available at: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/robot-hot-among-surgeons-fda-taking-new-look, 9 Apr 2013, Accessed 9 Aug 2013
27. Cooper MA, Ibrahim A, Lyu H, Makary MA (2013) Underreporting of Robotic Surgery Complications. J Healthc Qual; Aug 27, [epub ahead of print] PMID 23980819