Biological sulfate removal from acrylic fiber manufacturing wastewater using a two-stage UASB reactor

Journal of Environmental Sciences

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 343-350

  Li, Jin ^a   Wang, Jun ^a   Luan, Zhaokun ^a   Ji, Zhongguang ^a   Yu, Lian ^a  

^a RESEARCH CENTER FOR ECO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

A two stage UASB reactor; Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); Granule; Sulfidogenesis

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC FIBERS; EXTRACELLULAR POLYMERIC SUBSTANCES; FLOCCULENT SLUDGE; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION (FISH); GRANULE; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; MESOPHILIC; METHANOGENESIS; MIXED LIQUOR SUSPENDED SOLIDS; SULFATE REDUCING; SULFATE REDUCING BACTERIA; SULFATE REMOVAL; SULFIDOGENESIS; TWO STAGE; UASB REACTOR;

BACTERIA; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; GRANULATION; MANUFACTURE; METHANE; TEXTILE FIBERS;

SULFUR COMPOUNDS;

SULFATE;

BACTERIUM; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; METHANOGENESIS; SULFATE; WASTEWATER;

ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOREACTOR; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIAL CONSORTIUM; MICROBIOLOGY; SEWAGE; TEXTILE INDUSTRY; WATER POLLUTANT;

BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND ANALYSIS; BIOREACTORS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MICROBIAL CONSORTIA; SULFATES; TEXTILE INDUSTRY; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84863162241     PISSN: 10010742     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60772-9     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. álvarez JA, Ruiz I, Gómez M, Presas J, Soto M Startup alternatives and performance of an UASB pilot plant treating diluted municipal wastewater at low temperature. Bioresource Technology 2006, 97(14):1640-1649.
2. Amann RI, Krumholz L, Stahl DA Fluorescentoligonucleotide probing of whole cells for determinative, phylogenetic, and environmental studies in microbiology. Journal of Bacteriology 1990, 172(2):762-770.
3. APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1999, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
4. Buzzini AP, Sakamoto IK, Varesche MB, Pires EC Evaluation of the microbial diversity in an UASB reactor treating wastewater from an unbleached pulp plant. Process Biochemistry 2006, 41(1):168-176.
5. Cheng SS, Chen YN, Wu KL, Chuang HP, Chen SD Study of a three-stage fluidized bed process treating acrylic synthetic-fiber manufacturing wastewater containing high-strength nitrogenous compounds. Water Science and Technology 2004, 49(5-6):113-120.
6. Chinwetkitvanich S, Tuntoolvest M, Panswad T Anaerobic decolorization of reactive dyebath effluents by a two-stage UASB system with tapioca as a co-substrate. Water Research 2000, 34(8):2223-2232.
7. Cronin C, Lo KV Anaerobic treatment of brewery wastewater using UASB reactors seeded with activated sludge. Bioresource Technology 1998, 64(1):33-38.
8. Dar SA, Kleerebezem R, Stams AJM, Kuenen JG, Muyzer G Competition and coexistence of sulfate-reducing bacteria, acetogens and methanogens in a lab-scale anaerobic bioreactor as affected by changing substrate to sulfate ratio. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2008, 78(6):1045-1055.
9. Diamantis VI, Aivasidis A Comparison of single- and two-stage UASB reactors used for anaerobic treatment of synthetic fruit wastewater. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2007, 42(1):6-10.
10. Francese A, Córdoba P, Durán J, Siñeriz F High upflow velocity and organic loading rate improve granulation in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 1998, 14(3):337-341.
11. Lens PNL, Visser A, Janssen AJH, Hulshoff Pol LW, Lettinga G Biotechnological treatment of sulfate-rich wastewaters. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 1998, 28(1):41-88.
12. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1951, 193(1):265-275.
13. Maree JP, Strydom WF Biological sulphate removal in an upflow packed bed reactor. Water Research 1985, 19(9):1101-1106.
14. McCartney DM, Oleszkiewicz JA Sulfide inhibition of anaerobic degradation of lactate and acetate. Water Research 1991, 25(2):203-209.
15. Mizuno O, Li YY, Noike T Effects of sulfate concentration and sludge retention time on the interaction between methane production and sulfate reduction for butyrate. Water Science and Technology 1994, 30(8):45-54.
16. Morgan JW, Forster CF, Evison L A comparative study of the nature of biopolymers extracted from anaerobic and activated sludges. Water Research 1990, 24(6):743-750.
17. Nadais H, Barbosa M, Capela I, Arroja L, Ramos CG, Grilo A, et al. Enhancing wastewater degradation and biogas production by intermittent operation of UASB reactors. Energy 2010, 36(4):2164-2168.
18. Nielsen PH Biofilm dynamics and kinetics during highrate sulfate reduction under anaerobic conditions. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1987, 53(1):27-32.
19. Parkin GF, Sneve MA, Loos H Anaerobic filter treatment of sulfate-containing wastewaters. Water Science and Technology 1991, 23(7-9):1283-1291.
20. Reid E, Liu XR, Judd SJ Effect of high salinity on activated sludge characteristics and membrane permeability in an immersed membrane bioreactor. Journal of Membrane Science 2006, 283(1-2):164-171.
21. SaeEum O Performance of two-phase UASB reactor in anaerobic treatment of wastewater with sulfate. Environmental Engineering Research 2007, 12(1):8-15.
22. Sandaa RA, Torsvik V, Enger O, Daae FL, Castberg T, Hahn D Analysis of bacterial communities in heavy metal-contaminated soils at different levels of resolution. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 1999, 30(3):237-251.
23. Sarti A, Pozzi E, Chinalia FA, Ono A, Foresti E Microbial processes and bacterial populations associated to anaerobic treatment of sulfate-rich wastewater. Process Biochemistry 2010, 45(2):164-170.
24. Schmidt JEE, Ahring BK Extracellular polymers in granular sludge from different upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 1994, 42(2-3):457-462.
25. Sinbuathong N, Khaodhiar S, Liengcharernsit W, Sirirote P, Watts D Effect of sulfate on the methanogenic activity of a bacterial culture from a brewery wastewater during glucose degradation. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2007, 19(9):1025-1027.
26. Silva AJ, Varesche MB, Foresti E, Zaiat M Sulphate removal from industrial wastewater using a packed-bed anaerobic reactor. Process Biochemistry 2002, 37(9):927-935.
27. Stahl DA, Amann R Development and application of nucleic acid probes. Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics 1991, 205-248. John Wiley & Sons, New York. E. Stackebrandt, M. Goodfellow (Eds.).
28. Tiwari MK, Guha S, Harendranath CS, Tripathi S Influence of extrinsic factors on granulation in UASB reactor. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2006, 71(2):145-154.
29. Uyanik S, Sallis PJ, Anderson GK The effect of polymer addition on granulation in an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). Part I: process performance. Water Research 2002, 36(4):933-943.
30. Wang AJ, Ren NQ, Wang X, Lee D Enhanced sulfate reduction with acidogenic sulfate-reducing bacteria. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2008, 154(1-3):1060-1065.
31. Wei CH, Wang WX, Deng ZY, Wu CF Characteristics of high-sulfate wastewater treatment by two-phase anaerobic digestion process with Jet-loop anaerobic fluidized bed. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2007, 19(3):264-270.
32. Zhang YL, Zhao JF, Gu GW Biodegradation kinetic of organic compounds of acrylic fiber wastewater in biofilm. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2003, 15(6):757-761.
33. Zhao YG, Wang AJ, Ren NQ, Zhao QS, Zadsar M Impacts of alkalinity drops on shifting of functional sulfate-reducers in a sulfate-reducing bioreactor characterized by FISH. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 2007, 15(2):276-280.
34. Zhou W, Imai T, Ukita M, Sekine M, Higuchi T Enhanced granulation in UASB reactors by producing extracellular polymer at over loading. Japan Society of Civil Engineers 2003, 741(28):167-173.