Critical factors for enhancing municipal public hearings

Public Administration Review

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 490-499

  Baker, William H ^a,c   Lon Addams, H ^b   Davis, Brian ^b  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844509677     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00474.x     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Balla, Steven J. 2000. Legislative Success and Failure and Participation in Rule Making. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(3): 633-53.
2. Bryson, John M., and Sharon R. Anderson. 2000. Applying Large-Group Interaction Methods in the Planning and Implementation of Major Change Efforts. Public Administration Review 60(2): 143-62.
3. Burby, Raymond J. 2003. Making Plans that Matter: Citizen Involvement and Government Action. Journal of the American Planning Association 69(1): 33-49.
4. Carson, Lyn. 1999. The Telephone as a Participatory Mechanism at a Local Government Level. In Technology and Public Participation, edited by Brian Martin, 37-60. Wollongong, Australia: University of Wollongong.
5. Chipman, Helen, Patricia Kendall, Michael Slater, and Garry Auld. 1996. Audience Responses to a Risk Communication Message in Four Media Formats. Journal of Nutrition Education 28(3): 133-39.
6. Covey, Stephen R. 1991. Principle-Centered Leadership. New York: Simon and Schuster.
7. Crewson, Philip E., and Bonnie S. Fisher. 1997. Growing Older and Wiser: The Changing Skill Requirements of City Administrators. Public Administration Review 57(5): 380-86.
8. Crosby, Ned, Janet M. Kelly, and Paul Schaefer. 1986. Citizens Panels: A New Approach to Citizen Participation. Public Administration Review 46(2): 170-78.
9. Davis, Richard. 2000. The Net Effect. Brigham Young Magazine, Fall, 40-46.
10. Ebdon, Carol. 2002. Citizen Participation in the Local Government Process. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting, and Financial Management 14(2): 273-94.
11. Fiorino, Daniel J. 1990. Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms. Science, Technology, and Human Values 15(2): 226-43.
12. Frewer, Lynn J., Chaya Howard, Duncan Hedderley, and Richard Shepherd. 1996. What Determines Trust in Information about Food-Related Risks? Underlying Psychological Constructs. Risk Analysis 16(4): 473-86.
13. Golding, Dominic, Sheldon Krimsky, and Alonzo Plough. 1992. Evaluating Risk Communication: Narrative vs. Technical Presentations of Information about Radon. Risk Analysis 12(1): 27-35.
14. King, Cheryl S., Kathryn M. Feltey, and Bridget O'Neill Susel. 1998. The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration. Public Administration Review 58(4): 317-26.
15. Lando, Tom. 2003. The Public Hearing Process: A Tool for Citizen Participation, or a Path toward Citizen Alienation? National Civic Review 92(1): 73-83.
16. Lowndes, Vivien, Gerry Stoker, Lawrence Pratchett, David Wilson, Steve Leach, and Melvin Wingfield. 1998. Enhancing Public Participation in Local Government. London: U.K. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
17. McCombs, Maxwell. 1997. Building Consensus: The News Media's Agenda-Setting Roles. Political Communication 14(4): 433-43.
18. McLeod, Jack M., Dietram A. Scheufele, and Patricia Moy. 1999. Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation. Political Communication 16(3): 315-36.
19. Midden, Cees J. H. 1995. Direct Participation in Macro-Issues: A Multiple Group Approach; An Analysis and Critique of the Dutch National Debate on Energy Policy, Fairness, Competence, and Beyond. In Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation, edited by Ortwin Renn, Thomas Webler, and Peter Wiedemann, 305-20. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
20. Middendorf, Gerad, and Lawrence Busch. 1997. Inquiry for the Public Good: Democratic Participation in Agricultural Research. Agriculture and Human Values 14(1): 45-57.
21. Nalbandian, John. 1999. Facilitating Community, Enabling Democracy: New Roles for Local Government Managers. Public Administration Review 59(3): 187-97.
22. Pew Research Center. 1998. Internet News Takes Off. http://people-press. org/reports/display.php3?PageID=566.
23. _. 2000. Performance and Purpose: Constituents Rate Government Agencies, http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=41.
24. Rowe, Gene, and Lynn J. Frewer. 2000. Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Value 25(1): 3-27.
25. Sei-Hill Kim, Dietram A. Scheufele, and James Shanahan. 2002. Think About It This Way: Attribute Agenda-Setting Function of the Press and the Public's Evaluation of a Local Issue. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 79(1): 7-25.
26. Smith, L. Graham, Carla Y. Nell, and Mark V. Prystupa. 1997. The Converging Dynamics of Interest Representation in Resources Management. Environmental Management 21(2): 139-46.
27. Thomas, John C. 1995. Public Participation in Public Decisions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Walters, Lawrence C., James Aydelotte, and Jessica Miller. 2000. Putting More Public in Policy Analysis. Public Administration Review 60(4): 349-59.
29. Young, Iris Marion. 2001. Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy. Political Theory 29(5): 670-90.