Who you are/where you live: do neighbourhood characteristics explain co-production?

International Review of Administrative Sciences

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 88-109

  Thijssen, Peter ^a   Van Dooren, Wouter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

citizen participation; co production; local government; multilevel analysis; social capital

Indexed keywords

LOCAL GOVERNMENT; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; NEIGHBORHOOD; PLANNING THEORY; PUBLIC SERVICE; SOCIAL CAPITAL; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 84960440140     PISSN: 00208523     EISSN: 14617226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0020852315570554     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. P.S.AdlerS.-W.Kwon (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review27(1): 17–40.
2. J.Alford (2002) Why do public-sector clients coproduce? Toward a contingency theory. Administration & Society34(1): 32–56.
3. M.Archer (1996) Social integration and system integration: Developing the distinction. Sociology30(4): 679–699.
4. T.Bovaird (2007) Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review67(5): 846–860.
5. H.E.BradyS.VerbaK.L.Schlozman (1995) Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review89(2): 271–294.
6. J.BrehmW.Rahn (1997) Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science41(3): 999–1023.
7. É.CharbonneauG.G.Van Ryzin (2012) Performance measures and parental satisfaction with New York City schools. American Review of Public Administration42(1): 54–65.
8. J.S.Coleman (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology94: S95–S120.
9. J.J.Corbin (1999) A study of factors influencing the growth of nonprofits in social services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly28(3): 296–314.
10. R.J.Dalton (2008) Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Washington: CQ press.
11. R.F.Durant (1995) The democratic deficit in America. Political Science Quarterly110(1): 25–47.
12. J.G.GimpelF.E.LeeJ.Kaminski (2006) The political geography of campaign contributions in American politics. Journal of Politics68: 626–639.
13. A.Goerres (2006) Why are older people more likely to vote? The impact of ageing on electoral turnout in Europe. British Journal of Politics & International Relations9(1): 90–121.
14. A.Gofen (2012) Entrepreneurial exit response to dissatisfaction with public services. Public Administration90(4): 1088–1106.
15. E.GraddyL.Wang (2009) Community foundation development and social capital. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly38(3): 392–412.
16. M.S.Granovetter (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–1380.
17. R.InglehartC.Welzel (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. J.Jacobs (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities, New York: Vintage.
19. E.James (1986) The private nonprofit provision of education: A theoretical model and application to Japan. Journal of Comparative Economics10(3): 255–276.
20. J.E.LeighleyA.Vedlitz (1999) Race, ethnicity, and political participation: Competing models and contrasting explanations. Journal of Politics61(4): 1092–1114.
21. K.M.Leyden (2003) Social capital and the built environment: The importance of walkable neighborhoods. American Journal of Public Health93(9): 1546–1551.
22. J.R.Lincoln (1977) The urban distribution of voluntary organizations. Social Science Quarterly58(3): 472–480.
23. S.McClurg (2006) Political disagreement in context: The conditional effect of neighborhood context, disagreement and political talk on electoral participation. Political Behavior28(4): 349–366.
24. M.J.Marschall (2004) Citizen participation and the neighborhood context: A new look at the coproduction of local public goods. Political Research Quarterly57(2): 231–244.
25. R.K.Merton (1988) The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis79(4): 606–623.
26. Nabatchi T (2010) Deliberative democracy: The effects of participation on political efficacy. Doctoral thesis, Indiana University
27. J.Nalbandian (1999) Facilitating community, enabling democracy: New roles for local government managers. Public Administration Review59(3): 187–197.
28. L.E.PaarlbergS.Gen (2009) Exploring the determinants of nonprofit coproduction of public service delivery: The case of k-12 public education. American Review of Public Administration39(4): 391–408.
29. C.Pollitt (2008) Time, Policy, Management: Governing with the Past, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. R.D.Putnam (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31. R.D.Putnam (2001) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, London: Simon and Schuster.
32. S.J.RosenstoneJ.M.Hansen (2002) Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America, (1st edn). New York: Pearson.
33. R.J.Sampson (2012) Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
34. G.D.SaxtonM.A.Benson (2005) Social capital and the growth of the nonprofit sector. Social Science Quarterly86(1): 16–35.
35. J.C.Scott (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed, New Haven: Yale University Press.
36. G.Serra (1995) Citizen-initiated contact and satisfaction with bureaucracy: A multivariate analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory5(2): 175–188.
37. E.B.Sharp (1986) Citizen Demand-making in the Urban Context, Birmingham: University of Alabama Press.
38. N.Smith (1996) The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City, London: Routledge.
39. M.Southworth (2005) Designing the walkable city. Journal of Urban Planning and Development131(4): 246–257.
40. J.C.Teaford (2013) Jane Jacobs and the cosmopolitan metropolis: 2012 UHA Presidential Address. Journal of Urban History39(5): 881.
41. J.Teorell (2003) Linking social capital to political participation: Voluntary associations and networks of recruitment in Sweden. Scandinavian Political Studies26(1): 49–66.
42. J.C.ThomasJ.Melkers (1999) Explaining citizen-initiated contacts with municipal bureaucrats: Lessons from the Atlanta experience. Urban Affairs Review34(5): 667–690.
43. J.C.ThomasG.Streib (2003) The new face of government: Citizen-initiated contacts in the era of e-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory13(1): 83–102.
44. W.Van DoorenN.ThijsG.Bouckaert (2004) Quality management and the management of quality in European public administrations. In: (eds) Improving the Quality of East and West European Public Services, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 91–106.
45. Van Laecke P (2008) Wat ligt er op de buurtbarbecue: een onderzoek naar het sociaal kapitaal. University of Antwerp, Antwerpen
46. S.Verba (1987) Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47. S.VerbaL.S.KayE.B.Henry (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. J.Q.WilsonG.L.Kelling (1982) Broken windows. Atlantic Monthly249(3): 29–38.
49. R.E.WolfingerS.J.Rosenstone (1980) Who Votes?, New Haven: Yale University Press.