Quality management and the management of quality in European Public Administrations

Improving the Quality of East and West European Public Services

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 91-106

  van Dooren, Wouter ^a   Thijs, Nick ^a   Bouckaert, Geert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85121091408     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Bauer, H. (2002), 'Quality Management in the Public Sector through the Common Assessment Framework', in: Caddy, J. and Vintar, M. (eds.), Building Better Quality Administration for the Public: Case Studies from Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPAcee, pp. 62-70.
2. Boeri, T.; Börsch-Supan, A. and Tabellini, G. (2001), 'Would you Like to Shrink the Welfare State? A Survey of European Citizens', Economic Policy (April), pp. 8-50.
3. Bok, D. (2001), The Trouble With Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Bouckaert, G. (1992), 'Beleid en Productiviteit', in: Beleidsvoering Overheid. Alphen a/d Rijn: Samsom H.D. Tjeenk Willink.
5. Bouckaert, G. (1998), 'Sustainable Development of Networks in a Governance Context', in: Theron, F.; Van Rooyen, A. and Uys, F. (eds.), Spanning the Global Divide: Networking for Sustainable Delivery. School of Public Management. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch Press, pp. 40-56.
6. Bouckaert, G. (2000a), 'Techniques de modernisation et modernisation des techniques: Evaluer la modernisation de la gestion publique', in: Rouban, L. (ed.), Le Service Public en Devenir. Paris: L'Harmattan, pp. 107-128.
7. Bouckaert, G. (2000b), 'Trajectories of Modernisation and Reform in Financial Management in the Public Sector', in: Theron. F., Van Rooyen. A. and Van Baaien, J. (eds.), Good Governance for People: Policy and Management. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch, pp. 123-136.
8. Bouckaert, G. (2001), 'Pride and Performance in Public Service: Some Patterns of Analysis', International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 9-20.
9. Bouckaert, G. (2002), 'Administrative Convergence in the EU: Some Conclusions for CEECs', in: van den Berg, F.; Jenei, G. and Leloup, T. L. (eds.), East-West Cooperation in Public Sector Reform. Cases and Results in Central and Eastern Europe, Amsterdam et al.: IOS Press, pp. 59-68.
10. Bouckaert, G. and Gérard, T. (2000), Administrations and Globalisations. Brussels: International Institute of Administrative Sciences.
11. Bouckaert, G., Ormond, D. and Peters, Guy P. (2000), A Potential Governance Agenda for Finland. Helsinki: Ministry of Finance.
12. Bouckaert, G., Van de Walle, S., Maddens, B. and Kampen, J.K. (2002), Identity Vs. Performance: an Overview of Theories Explaining Trust in Government: Second Report 'Citizen Directed Governance: Quality and Trust in Government'. Leuven: Public Management Institute.
13. Bouckaert, G. (1995b), 'Remodeling Quality and Quantity in a Management Context', in: Halachmi, A. and Bouckaert, G. (eds), Public Productivity through Quality and Strategic Management, Amsterdam et al.: IOS Press.
14. Cabinet Office (2001), The People's Panel, London: Cabinet Office.
15. De Bruijn, J.A. and ten Heuvelhof, E.F. (1999), Netwerkmanagement: strategieën, instrumenten en normen. Utrecht: Lemma
16. Engel, C. (2002), 'Common Assessment Framework: The State of Affaires', in: Eipascoop, 2002/1, pp. 35-39.
17. Eurobarometer (1995), Trends 1974-1994, Public Opinion in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission.
18. Halachmi, A. and Nichols, K.L. (eds.) (1996), Enterprise Government: Franchising and Cross-Servicing for Administrative Support. Burke, Virginia: Chatelaine Press.
19. Hardin, R. (2002), Trust and Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
20. Harry, H. (1999), Performance Measurement: Getting Results. Washington D.C.: the Urban Institute Press.
21. Hegner F. (1986), 'Solidarity and Hierarchy: Institutional Arrangements for the Coordination of Actions,' in: Kauffman F-X.; Majone G. and V. Ostrom (eds.), Guidance, Control and Evaluation. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
22. Helu 'I Futa (1997), 'Tradition and Governance'. Discussion Paper 97/3. Canberra: The Australian National University.
23. IPSG (2002), 38th Meeting of Directors General Responsible for Public Administration in the European Union. Resolutions. La Rioja: Spanish European Presidency.
24. Kaplan, R. and Norton, D. (1992), 'The Balanced Scorecard, Measures that Drive Performance'. Harvard Business Review, January-February 1992, pp. 71-79.
25. Kaplan, R. and Norton, D. (1993), 'Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work', Harvard Business Review, September-October 1993, pp. 134-142.
26. Lane, J.-E. (1997), Public Sector Reform: Rationale, Trends and Problems. London: Sage.
27. Mandeli, M.P. (ed.) (2001), Getting Results through Collaboration: Networks and Network Structures for Public Policy and Management. Westport, Con.: Quorum Books.
28. Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat (2002), ISIS scenariowerkboek: schetsen voor scenario's. Ministerie voor Verkeer en Waterstaat, Den Haag.
29. Mintzberg, Henry (1981), Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research. Harlow: Prentice-Hall.
30. Nelson S. (2001), 'The Nature of Partnerships in Urban Renewal in Paris and London', European Planning Studies, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 483-502.
31. OECD (2000), Government of the Future. Paris, OECD.
32. OECD (1997), In Search for Results: Performance Management Practices. Paris: OECD.
33. OECD (2001a), Citizens as Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-Making. Paris: OECD.
34. OECD (2001b), 'Engaging Citizens in Policy-making: Information, Consultation and Public Participation'. PUMA Policy Brief No.10, July 2001.
35. OECD (2001c), Governance in the 21st Century, Paris: OECD.
36. Peters B.G. and Savoie D.J. (eds.), 2000, Governance in the Twenty-First Century. Montreal: CCMD & McGill-Queen's University Press.
37. Polliti, C. and Bouckaert, G. (eds.) (1995), Quality Improvement in European Public Services, Concepts, Cases and Commentary. London: Sage.
38. Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2000), Public Management Reform: An International Comparison. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
39. Polliti, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2002), 'Evaluating Public Management Reforms: an International Perspective', International Journal of Political Studies (Spring), pp. 167-192.
40. Public Futures (1998), Guide to the Public Service Excellent Model, Assessment Process and Criteria, London: Public Futures.
41. Schofield R. and Shaoul, J. (2000), Food Safety Regulation and the Conflict of Interest: the Case of Meat Safety and E. Colli 0157, Public Administration, Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 531-554.
42. Seppälä, O.T.; Hukka, J.J. and Katko, T.S. (2001), 'Public-Private Partnerships in Water and Sewerage Services: Privatization for Profit or Improvement of Service and Performance?', Public Works Management and Policy, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 42-58.
43. Sharkansky, I. (1975), Public Administration: Policy Making in Government Agencies. Chicago: Rand McNally.
44. Sigma (1999), European Principles for Public Administration. Sigma Papers, No. 27. Sigma/OECD: Paris.
45. Stromsnes D. (2002), 'Applying Quality to Public Administration in Practice, Presentation of the Common Assessment Framework', in: Caddy, J, and Vintar, M. (eds.), Building Better Quality Administration for the Public: Case Studies from Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPAcee, pp. 53-61.
46. Trichet, J.C. (2001), 'The Euro after Two Years', Journal of Common Market Studies. March 2001, pp. 1-13.
47. UNDP (1997), Governance for Sustainable Human Development. A UNDP Policy Document. New York: UNDP.
48. Wollmann, Hellmut (2001), 'Germany's Trajectory of Public Sector Modernisation: Continuities and Discontinuities', Policy & Politics, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 151-169.
49. Wright, G. (ed.) (2001), Government, Market and the Civic Sector: the Search for a Productive Partnership. Bratislava: NISPAcee.