A New, Improved Hybrid Scoring Function for Molecular Docking and Scoring Based on AutoDock and AutoDock Vina

Chemical Biology and Drug Design

Volumn 87, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 618-625

  Tanchuk, Vsevolod Yu ^a   Tanin, Volodymyr O ^a   Vovk, Andriy I ^a   Poda, Gennady ^b,c  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOORGANIC CHEMISTRY AND PETROCHEMISTRY   (Ukraine)

^b ONTARIO INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

AutoDock; AutoDock Vina; hybrid scoring function; molecular docking; scoring; virtual screening

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTODOCK; AUTOVOCK VINA; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DRUG DESIGN; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STATISTICAL CONCEPTS;

DRUG DESIGN; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION;

EID: 84960434532     PISSN: 17470277     EISSN: 17470285     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.12697     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Feher M., Williams C.I., (2012) Numerical errors and chaotic behavior in docking simulations. J Chem Inf Model; 52: 724-738.
2. Huang N., Shoichet B.K., Irwin J.J., (2006) Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. J Med Chem; 49: 6789-6801.
3. Smith R.D., Dunbar J.B. Jr, Ung P.M., Esposito E.X., Yang C.Y., Wang S., Carlson H.A., (2011) CSAR benchmark exercise of 2010: Combined evaluation across all submitted scoring functions. J Chem Inf Model; 51: 2115-2131.
4. Cheng T., Li X., Li Y., Liu Z., Wang R., (2009) Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set. J Chem Inf Model; 49: 1079-1093.
5. Damm-Ganamet K.L., Smith R.D., Dunbar J.B., Stuckey J.A., Carlson H.A., (2013) CSAR benchmark exercise 2011-2012: Evaluation of results from docking and relative ranking of blinded congeneric series. J Chem Inf Model; 53: 1853-1870.
6. Holt P.A.1, Chaires J.B., Trent J.O., (2008) Molecular docking of intercalators and groove-binders to nucleic acids using Autodock and Surflex. J Chem Inf Model; 48: 1602-1615.
7. Morris G.M., Huey R., Lindstrom W., Sanner M.F., Belew R.K., Goodsell D.S., Olson A.J., (2009) AJ.AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J Comput Chem; 30: 2785-2791.
8. Trott O., Olson A.J., (2010) AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem; 31: 455-461.
9. Wang R., Fang X., Lu Y., Wang S., (2004) The PDBbind database: Collection of binding affinities for protein-ligand complexes with known three-dimensional structures. J Med Chem; 47: 2977-2980.
10. Press W., Teukolsky S., Vetterling V., Flannery B., (1995) Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11. Li Y., Liu Z., Li J., Han L., Liu J., Zhao Z., Wang R., (2014) Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: I. compilation of the test set. J Chem Inf Model; 54: 1700-1716.
12. Li Y., Liu Z., Li J., Han L., Liu J., Zhao Z., Wang R., (2014) Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: II. Evaluation methods and general results. J Chem Inf Model; 54: 1717-1736.
13. Li G.B., Yang L.L., Wang W.J., Li L.L., Yang S.Y., (2013) ID-score: A new empirical scoring function based on a comprehensive set of descriptors related to protein-ligand interactions. J Chem Inf Model; 53: 592-600.
14. Zhang S., Zhang Z.Y., (2007) PTP1B as a drug target: Recent developments in PTP1B inhibitor discovery. Drug Discov Today; 12: 373-381.
15. Doman T.N., McGovern S.L., Witherbee B.J., Kasten T.P., Kurumbail R., Stallings W.C., Connolly D.T., Shoichet B.K., (2002) Molecular docking and high-throughput screening for novel inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B. J Med Chem; 45: 2213-2221.
16. Tanchuk V.Y., Tanin V.O., Vovk A.I., (2012) Classification of binding site conformations of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B. Chem Biol Drug Des; 80: 121-128.