McGRATH MAC videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation in intensive care patients: The randomised multicentre MACMAN trial study protocol

BMJ Open

Volumn 5, Issue 12, 2015, Pages

  Bailly, Arthur ^a   Lascarrou, Jean Baptiste ^a   Le Thuaut, Aurelie ^a,b   Boisrame Helms, Julie ^c,d   Kamel, Toufik ^e   Mercier, Emmanuelle ^f   Ricard, Jean Damien ^g,h   Lemiale, Virginie ⁱ   Champigneulle, Benoit ^j   Reignier, Jean ^k  

^a District Hospital Centre   (France)

^b HÔTEL DIEU   (France)

^c HÔPITAL CIVIL   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^e Service d'urologie andrologie   (France)

^f UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF TOURS   (France)

^g HÔPITAL LOUIS MOURIER   (France)

^h UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

ⁱ SAINT LOUIS HOSPITAL   (France)

^j Institut Cochin   (France)

^k NANTES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; EMERGENCY CARE; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT SAFETY; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RIGID LARYNGOSCOPE; VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; FEMALE; FRANCE; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LARYNGOSCOPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; VERY ELDERLY; VIDEORECORDING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGOSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; VIDEO RECORDING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84960431250     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009855     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gotzsche PC, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: Guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346:e7586.
2. Crosby ET, Cooper RM, Douglas MJ, et al. The unanticipated difficult airway with recommendations for management. Can J Anaesth 1998;45:757-76.
3. Schwartz DE, Matthay MA, Cohen NH. Death and other complications of emergency airway management in critically ill adults. A prospective investigation of 297 tracheal intubations. Anesthesiology 1995;82:367-76.
4. Mort TC. The incidence and risk factors for cardiac arrest during emergency tracheal intubation: A justification for incorporating the ASA Guidelines in the remote location. J Clin Anesth 2004;16:508-16.
5. Griesdale DE, Bosma TL, Kurth T, et al. Complications of endotracheal intubation in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med 2008;34:1835-42.
6. Jaber S, Amraoui J, Lefrant JY, et al. Clinical practice and risk factors for immediate complications of endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: A prospective, multiple-center study. Crit Care Med 2006;34:2355-61.
7. Mort TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: Complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg 2004;99:607-13.
8. Sakles JC, Chiu S, Mosier J, et al. The importance of first pass success when performing orotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2013;20:71-8.
9. Jabre P, Combes X, Lapostolle F, et al. Etomidate versus ketamine for rapid sequence intubation in acutely ill patients: A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;374:293-300.
10. Duwat A, Turbelin A, Petiot S, et al. [French national survey on difficult intubation in intensive care units]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2014;33:297-303.
11. El-Orbany M, Connolly LA. Rapid sequence induction and intubation: Current controversy. Anesth Analg 2010;110:1318-25.
12. Di Filippo A, Gonnelli C. Rapid sequence intubation: A review of recent evidences. Rev Recent Clin Trials 2009;4:175-8.
13. Baillard C, Fosse JP, Sebbane M, et al. Noninvasive ventilation improves preoxygenation before intubation of hypoxic patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;174:171-7.
14. Jaber S, Jung B, Corne P, et al. An intervention to decrease complications related to endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: A prospective, multiple-center study. Intensive Care Med 2010;36:248-55.
15. Cook TM, Woodall N, Harper J, et al. Major complications of airway management in the UK: Results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: Intensive care and emergency departments. Br J Anaesth 2011;106:632-42.
16. Henderson JJ, Popat MT, Latto IP, et al. Difficult Airway Society guidelines for management of the unanticipated difficult intubation. Anaesthesia 2004;59:675-94.
17. Amour J, Marmion F, Birenbaum A, et al. Comparison of plastic single-use and metal reusable laryngoscope blades for orotracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2006;104:60-4.
18. Walker L, Brampton W, Halai M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2009;103:440-5.
19. Rosenstock CV, Thogersen B, Afshari A, et al. Awake fiberoptic or awake video laryngoscopic tracheal intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airway management: A randomized clinical trial. Anesthesiology 2012;116:1210-16.
20. Ng I, Sim XL, Williams D, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing the McGrath((R)) videolaryngoscope with the straight blade laryngoscope when used in adult patients with potential difficult airways. Anaesthesia 2011;66:709-14.
21. Aziz MF, Dillman D, Fu R, et al. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway. Anesthesiology 2012;116:629-36.
22. De Jong A, Molinari N, Conseil M, et al. Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for orotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2014;40:629-39.
23. Guyette FX, Farrell K, Carlson JN, et al. Comparison of video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy in a critical care transport service. Prehosp Emerg Care 2013;17:149-54.
24. Mosier JM, Whitmore SP, Bloom JW, et al. Video laryngoscopy improves intubation success and reduces esophageal intubations compared to direct laryngoscopy in the medical intensive care unit. Crit Care 2013;17:R237.
25. Kory P, Guevarra K, Mathew JP, et al. The impact of video laryngoscopy use during urgent endotracheal intubation in the critically ill. Anesth Analg 2013;117:144-9.
26. De Jong A, Clavieras N, Conseil M, et al. Implementation of a combo videolaryngoscope for intubation in critically ill patients: A before-after comparative study. Intensive Care Med 2013;39:2144-52.
27. Noppens RR, Geimer S, Eisel N, et al. Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC(R) video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: A prospective, comparative study in the ICU. Crit Care 2012;16:R103.
28. Griesdale DE, Chau A, Isac G, et al. Video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in critically ill patients: A pilot randomized trial. Can J Anaesth 2012;59:1032-9.
29. Silverberg MJ, Li N, Acquah SO, et al. Comparison of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy during urgent endotracheal intubation: A randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 2015;43:636-41.
30. Yeatts DJ, Dutton RP, Hu PF, et al. Effect of video laryngoscopy on trauma patient survival: A randomized controlled trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013;75:212-19.
31. Liu L, Yue H, Li J. Comparison of three tracheal intubation techniques in thyroid tumor patients with a difficult airway: A randomized controlled trial. Med Princ Pract 2014;23:448-52.
32. Maharaj CH, Higgins BD, Harte BH, et al. Evaluation of intubation using the AirtraqO? or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy-a manikin study. Anaesthesia 2006;61:469-77.
33. De Jong A, Molinari N, Terzi N, et al. Early identification of patients at risk for difficult intubation in the intensive care unit: Development and validation of the MACOCHA score in a multicenter cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;187:832-9.
34. McCrory JW, Matthews JN. Comparison of four methods of preoxygenation. Br J Anaesth 1990;64:571-6.
35. Hett DA, Geraghty IF, Radford R, et al. Routine preoxygenation using a Hudson mask. A comparison with a conventional pre-oxygenation technique. Anaesthesia 1994;49:157-9.
36. Robinson A, Ercole A. Evaluation of the self-inflating bag-valve-mask and non-rebreather mask as preoxygenation devices in volunteers. BMJ Open 2012;2:pii: E001785.
37. Miguel-Montanes R, Hajage D, Messika J, et al. Use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy to prevent desaturation during tracheal intubation of intensive care patients with mild-to-moderate hypoxemia. Crit Care Med 2015;43:574-83.
38. Sinclair RC, Luxton MC. Rapid sequence induction. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain 2005;5:45-8.
39. Jung B, Chanques G, Sebbane M, et al. Les modalités De l'intubation en urgence et ses complications. Réanimation 2008;17:753-60.
40. Langeron O, Bourgain JL, Laccoureye O, et al. [Difficult airway algorithms and management: Question 5. Societe Francaise d'Anesthesie et De Reanimation]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2008;27:41-5.
41. Wang HE, Seitz SR, Hostler D, et al. Defining the learning curve for paramedic student endotracheal intubation. Prehosp Emerg Care 2005;9:156-62.
42. Roux D, Reignier J, Thiery G, et al. Acquiring procedural skills in ICUs: A prospective multicenter study. Crit Care Med 2014;42:886-95.
43. Simpson GD, Ross MJ, McKeown DW, et al. Tracheal intubation in the critically ill: A multi-centre national study of practice and complications. Br J Anaesth 2012;108:792-9.