Video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in critically ill patients: A pilot randomized trial

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 59, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1032-1039

  Griesdale, Donald E G ^a,b,c   Chau, Anthony ^a   Isac, George ^a,c   Ayas, Najib ^a,d   Foster, Denise ^c   Irwin, Corrie ^c   Choi, Peter ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b VANCOUVER COASTAL HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c VANCOUVER GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d ST PAUL S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOPAMINE; FENTANYL; KETAMINE; MIDAZOLAM; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING AGENT; NORADRENALIN; PHENYLALANINE; PROPOFOL; ROCURONIUM; SUXAMETHONIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; GLOTTIS; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; LARYNGOSCOPY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PARALLEL DESIGN; PILOT STUDY; POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCEDURES; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESIDENT; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; RESUSCITATION; SIMULATION; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY;

AGED; APACHE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; GLOTTIS; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGOSCOPES; LARYNGOSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OXYGEN; PILOT PROJECTS; RESPIRATORY INSUFFICIENCY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84871235311     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: 14968975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-012-9775-8     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Griesdale DE, Bosma TL, Kurth T, Isac G, Chittock DR. Complications of endotracheal intubation in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 1835-42.
2. Mort TC. Preoxygenation in critically ill patients requiring emergency tracheal intubation. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 2672-5.
3. Hirsch-Allen AJ, Ayas N, Mountain S, Dodek P, Peets A, Griesdale DE. Influence of residency training on multiple attempts at endotracheal intubation. Can J Anesth 2010; 57: 823-9.
4. Jaber S, Amraoui J, Lefrant JY, et al. Clinical practice and risk factors for immediate complications of endotracheal intubation inthe intensive care unit: a prospective, multiple-center study. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 2355-61.
5. Benedetto WJ, Hess DR, Gettings E, et al. Urgent tracheal intubation in general hospital units: an observational study. J Clin Anesth 2007; 19: 20-4.
6. Schwartz DE, Matthay MA, Cohen NH. Death and other complications of emergency airway management in critically ill adults. A prospective investigation of 297 tracheal intubations. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 367-76.
7. Griesdale DE, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT. Glidescope-) videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-Analysis. Can J Anesth 2012; 59: 41-52.
8. Nouruzi-Sedeh P, Schumann M, Groeben H. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh blade versus GlideScope: success rate and time for endotracheal intubation in untrained medical personnel. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 32-7.
9. Shimada M, Hirabayashi Y, Seo N. Nasotracheal intubation using GlideScope videolaryngoscope or Macintosh laryngoscope by novice laryngoscopists (Japanese). Masui 2010; 59: 1318-20.
10. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2010; 2010(152): 726-32.
11. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13: 818-29.
12. Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 1984; 39: 1105-11.
13. Mihai R, Blair E, Kay H, Cook TM. A quantitative review and meta-Analysis of performance of non-standard laryngoscopes and rigid fibreoptic intubation aids. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 745-60.
14. Walls RM, Samuels-Kalow M, Perkins A. A new maneuver for endotracheal tube insertion during difficult GlideScope intubation. J Emerg Med 2010; 39: 86-8.
15. Jones PM, Armstrong KP, Armstrong PM, et al. A comparison of glidescope videolaryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 144-8.
16. Sun DA, Warriner CB, Parsons DG, Klein R, Umedaly HS, Moult M. The GlideScope video laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 381-4.
17. Teoh WH, Shah MK, Sia AT. Randomised comparison of Pentax AirwayScope and Glidescope for tracheal intubation in patients with normal airway anatomy. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 1125-9.
18. Bilehjani E, Fakhari S. Hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy in ischemic heart disease: Macintosh blade versus Glidescope-videolaryngoscope. Rawal Med J 2009; 34: 151-4.
19. Aziz MF, Healy D, Kheterpal S, Fu RF, Dillman D, Brambrink AM. Routine clinical practice effectiveness of the Glidescope in difficult airway management: an analysis of 2,004 Glidescope intubations, complications, and failures from two institutions. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 34-41.
20. Kovacs G, Law JA, Ross J, et al. Acute airway management in the emergency department by non-Anesthesiologists. Can J Anesth 2004; 51: 174-80.
21. Sagarin MJ, Barton ED, Chng YM. National Emergency Airway Registry Investigators. Airway management by US and Canadian emergency medicine residents: a multicenter analysis of more than 6,000 endotracheal intubation attempts. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 46: 328-36.
22. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Objectives of Training in the Specialty of Internal Medicine. 2011, version 1.0. Available from URL: http://rcpsc.medical.org/residency/certifi cation/objectives/intmed-e. pdf (accessed July 2012)
23. Neumar RW, Otto CW, Link MS, et al. Part 8: Adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3): S729-67.