Diagnostic accuracy study of anorectal manometry for diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation

Gut

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 447-455

  Grossi, Ugo ^a   Carrington, Emma V ^a   Bharucha, Adil E ^b   Horrocks, Emma J ^a   Scott, S Mark ^a   Knowles, Charles H ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ANORECTAL PRESSURE; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFECATION DISORDER; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL CONSTIPATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ANAL CANAL; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSTIPATION; DEFECATION; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANAL CANAL; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CONSTIPATION; DEFECATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84960415232     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: 14683288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308835     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Suares NC, Ford AC. Prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic idiopathic constipation in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106:1582-91; quiz 1, 92.
2. Bharucha AE, Pemberton JH, Locke GR III. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on constipation. Gastroenterology 2013;144:218-38.
3. Cook IJ, Talley NJ, Benninga MA, et al. Chronic constipation: overview and challenges. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2009;21(Suppl 2):1-8.
4. Ragg J, McDonald R, Hompes R, et al. Isolated colonic inertia is not usually the cause of chronic constipation. Colorectal Dis 2011;13:1299-302.
5. Bharucha AE, Wald A, Enck P, et al. Functional anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology 2006;130:1510-18.
6. Rao SS, Hatfield R, Soffer E, et al. Manometric tests of anorectal function in healthy adults. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:773-83.
7. Bharucha AE, Croak AJ, Gebhart JB, et al. Comparison of rectoanal axial forces in health and functional defecatory disorders. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006;290:G1164-9.
8. Chiarioni G, Kim SM, Vantini I, et al. Validation of the balloon evacuation test: reproducibility and agreement with findings from anorectal manometry and electromyography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12:2049-54.
9. Palit S, Bhan C, Lunniss PJ, et al. Evacuation proctography: a reappraisal of normal variability. Colorectal Dis 2014;16:538-46.
10. Halligan S, Malouf A, Bartram CI, et al. Predictive value of impaired evacuation at proctography in diagnosing anismus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:633-6.
11. Rao SS, Azpiroz F, Diamant N, etal. Minimum standards of anorectal manometry. NeurogastroenterolMotil 2002;14:553-9.
12. Scott SM, Gladman MA. Manometric, sensorimotor, and neurophysiologic evaluation of anorectal function. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2008;37:511-38, vii.
13. Rao SS, Welcher KD, Leistikow JS. Obstructive defecation: a failure of rectoanal coordination. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:1042-50.
14. Rao SS. Dyssynergic defecation and biofeedback therapy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2008;37:569-86, viii.
15. Carrington EV, Brokjaer A, Craven H, et al. Traditional measures of normal anal sphincter function using high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) in 115 healthy volunteers. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014;26:625-35.
16. Noelting J, Ratuapli SK, Bharucha AE, et al. Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry in healthy women: effects of age and significance of rectoanal gradient. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:1530-6.
17. Ratuapli SK, Bharucha AE, Noelting J, et al. Phenotypic identification and classification of functional defecatory disorders using high-resolution anorectal manometry. Gastroenterology 2013;144:314-22.e2.
18. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:W1-12.
19. Mohammed SD, Lunniss PJ, Zarate N, et al. Joint hypermobility and rectal evacuatory dysfunction: an etiological link in abnormal connective tissue? Neurogastroenterol Motil 2010;22:1085-e283.
20. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, etal. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2006;130:1480-91.
21. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, etal. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:681-5.
22. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, et al. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 1999;44:77-80.
23. Philbrick JT, Horwitz RI, Feinstein AR. Methodologic problems of exercise testing for coronary artery disease: groups, analysis and bias. Am J Cardiol 1980;46:807-12.
24. Sauter M, Heinrich H, Fox M, et al. Toward more accurate measurements of anorectal motor and sensory function in routine clinical practice: validation of high-resolution anorectal manometry and Rapid Barostat Bag measurements of rectal function. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014;26:685-95.
25. Rao SS, Mudipalli RS, Stessman M, et al. Investigation of the utility of colorectal function tests and Rome II criteria in dyssynergic defecation (Anismus). Neurogastroenterol Motil 2004;16:589-96.
26. Preston DM, Lennard-Jones JE. Anismus in chronic constipation. Dig Dis Sci 1985;30:413-18.
27. Landis JR, Koch GG. Measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
28. McGee S. Simplifying likelihood ratios. J Gen Intern Med 2002;17:646-9.
29. Wald A, Bharucha AE, Cosman BC, et al. ACG clinical guideline: management of benign anorectal disorders. Am J Gastroenterol 2014;109:1141-57; (Quiz) 058.
30. Bertiaux-Vandaele N, Youmba SB, Belmonte L, et al. The expression and the cellular distribution of the tight junction proteins are altered in irritable bowel syndrome patients with differences according to the disease subtype. Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106:2165-73.
31. Andersen JT, Bradley WE. The syndrome of detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia. J Urol 1976;116:493-5.
32. Merkel IS, Wald A. Training for straining: biofeedback for pelvic floor dyssynergia. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:1223-4.
33. Schouten WR, Briel JW, Auwerda JJ, et al. Anismus: fact or fiction? Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:1033-41.
34. Roberts JP, Womack NR, Hallan RI, et al. Evidence from dynamic integrated proctography to redefine anismus. Br J Surg 1992;79:1213-15.
35. Kerrigan DD, Lucas MG, Sun WM, et al. Idiopathic constipation associated with impaired urethrovesical and sacral reflex function. Br J Surg 1989;76:748-51.
36. Wald A, Caruana BJ, Freimanis MG, et al. Contributions of evacuation proctography and anorectal manometry to evaluation of adults with constipation and defecatory difficulty. Dig Dis Sci 1990;35:481-7.
37. Merkel IS, Locher J, Burgio K, et al. Physiologic and psychologic characteristics of an elderly population with chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:1854-9.
38. Barnes PR, Lennard-Jones JE. Function of the striated anal sphincter during straining in control subjects and constipated patients with a radiologically normal rectum or idiopathic megacolon. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;3:207-9.
39. Voderholzer WA, Neuhaus DA, Klauser AG, et al. Paradoxical sphincter contraction is rarely indicative of anismus. Gut 1997;41:258-62.
40. Harris LD, Pope CE II. "Squeeze" vs.resistance: an evaluation of the mechanism of sphincter competence. J Clin Invest 1964;43:2272-8.
41. Phillips SF, Edwards DA. Some aspects of anal continence and defaecation. Gut 1965;6:396-406.
42. Rao SS, Kavlock R, Rao S. Influence of body position and stool characteristics on defecation in humans. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:2790-6.
43. Duthie GS, Bartolo DC. Anismus: the cause of constipation? Results of investigation and treatment. World J Surg 1992;16:831-5.
44. Carrington EV, Grossi U, Knowles CH, et al. Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry: a time for consensus and collaboration. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014;26:1356-7.
45. Ratuapli S, Bharucha AE, Harvey D, et al. Comparison of rectal balloon expulsion test in seated and left lateral positions. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013;25:e813-20.
46. Bharucha AE, Rao SS. An update on anorectal disorders for gastroenterologists. Gastroenterology 2014;146:37-45.e2.
47. Minguez M, Herreros B, Sanchiz V, et al. Predictive value of the balloon expulsion test for excluding the diagnosis of pelvic floor dyssynergia in constipation. Gastroenterology 2004;126:57-62.
48. Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012;24(Suppl 1):57-65.
49. Heymen S, Scarlett Y, Jones K, et al. Randomized, controlled trial shows biofeedback to be superior to alternative treatments for patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia-type constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:428-41.
50. Rao SS, Seaton K, Miller M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback, sham feedback, and standard therapy for dyssynergic defecation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;5:331-8.
51. Rao SS, Valestin J, Brown CK, et al. Long-term efficacy of biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defecation: randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:890-6.
52. Lee YY, Erdogan A, Rao SS. High resolution and high definition anorectal manometry and pressure topography: diagnostic advance or a new kid on the block? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2013;15:360.