Integrating clinical research with the Healthcare Enterprise: From the RE-USE project to the EHR4CR platform

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 44, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages

  El Fadly, AbdenNaji ^a   Rance, Bastien ^b,f   Lucas, Noël ^b   Mead, Charles ^c   Chatellier, Gilles ^b,d   Lastic, Pierre Yves ^e   Jaulent, Marie Christine ^a   Daniel, Christel ^a,b,d  

^a CENTRE DE RECHERCHE DES CORDELIERS   (France)

^b HÔPITAL EUROPÉEN GEORGES POMPIDOU   (France)

^c NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^e SANOFI   (France)

^f NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

CDISE; Clinical protocols; Controlled vocabulary; HL7; IHE; Information systems; Semantic interoperability; Terminology; Translational research

Indexed keywords

CDISE; CONTROLLED VOCABULARY; HL7; IHE; SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

ALGORITHMS; CONFORMAL MAPPING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; EXPERIMENTS; HOSPITALS; INDUSTRY; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTEGRATION; INTEROPERABILITY; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; PATIENT TREATMENT; POPULATION STATISTICS; SEMANTICS; STANDARDS; TERMINOLOGY;

DATA ACQUISITION;

ACCURACY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; TREATMENT PLANNING;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; SOFTWARE;

EID: 83955161855     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Turisco F., Keogh D., Stubbs C., Glaser J., Crowley J.W.F. Current status of integrating information technologies into the clinical research enterprise within US academic health centers: strategic value and opportunities for investment. J Invest Med 2005, 53(8):425-433.
2. Powell J., Buchan I. Electronic health records should support clinical research. J Med Internet Res 2005, 7(1):e4.
3. West S.L., Blake C., Zhiwen L., McKoy J.N., Oertel M.D., Carey T.S. Reflections on the use of electronic health record data for clinical research. Health Inform J 2009, 15(2):108-121.
4. Ohmann C., Kuchinke W. Future developments of medical informatics from the viewpoint of networked clinical research. Interoperability and integration. Methods Inf Med 2009, 48(1):45-54.
5. Prokosch H., Ganslandt T. Perspectives for medical informatics. Reusing the electronic medical record for clinical research. Methods Inf Med 2009, 48(1):38-44.
6. Breil B., Semjonow A., Dugas M. HIS-based electronic documentation can significantly reduce the time from biopsy to final report for prostate tumours and supports quality management as well as clinical research. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2009, 9:5.
7. Ohmann C., Kuchinke W. Meeting the challenges of patient recruitment. A role for electronic health records. Int J Pharm Med 2007, 21:263-270.
8. Dugas M., Lange M., Müller T.C., Kirchhof P., Prokosch H. Routine data from hospital information systems can support patient recruitment for clinical studies. Clin Trials 2010, 7(2):183-189.
9. Kush R., Alschuler L., Ruggeri R., Cassells S., Gupta N., Bain L., et al. Implementing single source: the STARBRITE proof-of-concept study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007, 14(5):662-673.
10. Murphy E.C., Frederick L. An electronic medical records system for clinical research and the EMR-EDC interface. Natl Inst Health 2007, 48(10):4383-4389.
11. El Fadly A., Lucas N., Rance B., Verplancke P., Lastic P.Y., Daniel C., et al. The REUSE project: EHR as single data source for biomedical research. Health Technol Inform 2010, 160(Pt 2):1324-1328.
12. Williams J.G., Cheung W.Y., Cohen D.R., Hutchings H.A., Longo M.F., Russell I.T. Can randomised trials rely on existing electronic data? A feasibility study to explore the value of routine data in health technology assessment. Health Technol Asses 2003, 7(26):111-117.
13. Kahn M.G., Kaplan D. Configuration challenges: implementing translational research policies in electronic medical records. Acad Med 2007, 82(7):661-669.
14. Parexel's Bio/Pharmaceutical Statistical Sourcebook 2008/2009.
15. CDISC Electronic Source Data Interchange (eSDI) Group. Leveraging the CDISC standards to facilitate the use of electronic source data within clinical trials version, November 20, 2006. [cited 01.03.11]. http://www.cdisc.org/stuff/contentmgr/files/0/2f6eca8f0df7caac5bbd4fadfd 76d575/miscdocs/esdi.pdf.
16. eClinical Forum/PhRMA EDC/eSource Taskforce. The future vision of electronic health records as eSource for clinical research (Version 1.0), 2006, [cited 01.03.11]. http://www.esi-bethesda.com/ncrrworkshops/clinicalResearch/pdf/Catherine CeligrantPaper.pdf.
17. EHR/CR Functional Profile Project. [cited 01.03.11]. http://www.ehrcr.org.
18. CDISC Operational Data Model. [cited 01.03.11]. http://www.cdisc.org/models/odm/v1.3/index.html.
19. Fridsma DB, Evans J, Hastak S, Mead CN. The BRIDG project: a technical report. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:130-7. [cited 01.03.11]. http://www.bridgmodel.org.
20. Anonymous, Retrieve Form for Data capture (RFD) Supplement. IHE IT infrastructure technical framework; 2006. [cited 01.03.11]. http://www.ihe.net.
21. Colquitt J. Clinical research document (CRD) profile. [cited 01.03.11]. http://www.ihe.net/Events/upload/ihe_webinar_2008_session_7_Quality-Rese arch-Public-Health_CRD_Capture_July10_2008_Colquitt.pdf.
22. Rosenbloom S.T., Miller R.A., Johnson K.B. Interface terminologies: facilitating direct entry of clinical data into electronic health record systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006, 13(3):277-288.
23. CDISC Shared Health and Research Electronic Library Pilot Report; 2010. [cited 01.03.11]. http://www.cdisc.org/stuff/contentmgr/files/0/70e1df7a3cd8a66f331770b0bc 0f149b/misc/share_pilot_report_1_0.pdf.
24. Rector A.L. Clinical terminology: why is it so hard?. Methods Inf Med 1999, 38(4-5):239-252.
25. Benson T. Principles of health interoperability HL7 and SNOMED. Springer, Verlag; 2009.
26. Rosenbloom S.T., Brown S.H., Froehling D., Bauer B.A., Wahner-Roedler D.L., Gregg W.M., et al. Using SNOMED CT to represent two interface terminologies. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009, 16(1):81-88.
27. Wade G., Rosenbloom ST. Experiences mapping a legacy interface terminology to SNOMED CT. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008, 27(8 Suppl. 1):S3.
28. Daniel C., Buemi A., Mazuel L., Ouagne D., Charlet J. Functional requirements of terminology services for coupling interface terminologies to reference terminologies. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009, 150:205-209.
29. Rance B, Gibrat JF, Froidevaux C. An adaptive combination of matchers: application to the mapping of biological ontologies for genome annotation. Data Integration in the Life Sciences, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, DILS'09. LNBI 5647; 2009. p. 113-26.
30. Anonymous, Cross-Enterprise Document Media Interchange (XDM) supplement. IHE IT Infrastructure Technical Framework. [cited 03.01.11]. http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_ITI_TF_Supplement_XDM_ TI_2006_08_15.pdf.
31. Stroetman V, Kalra D, Lewalle P, Rector A, Rodrigues J, Stroetman K, et al. Semantic interoperability for better health and safer healthcare. The European Commission; 2009. [cited 01.03.11]. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/health/docs/publicati ons/2009/2009semantic-health-report.pdf.
32. NCI CBIIT. A semantic service oriented architecture (sSOA). [cited 01.03.11]. http://cabig.cancer.gov/perspectives/biomedicine/health20/soa/.
33. Electronic Primary Care Research Network. [cited 01.03.11]. http://www.epcrn.bham.ac.uk/.
34. Weber G.M., Murphy S.N., McMurry A.J., Macfadden D., Nigrin D.J., Churchill S., et al. The shared health research information network (SHRINE): a prototype federated query tool for clinical data repositories. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009, 16(5):624-630.