Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 726-731

  Kasel Seibert, Moritz ^a   Lehmann, Thomas ^a   Aschenbach, René ^a   Guettler, Felix V ^a   Abubrig, Mohamed ^a   Grimm, Marc Oliver ^a   Teichgraeber, Ulf ^a   Franiel, Tobias ^a  

^a JENA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biopsy; ESUR; MRI; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

GADOBUTROL; PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CHRONIC PROSTATITIS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; IMAGE GUIDED BIOPSY; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VERY ELDERLY; BIOPSY; CANCER GRADING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE; PROSTATE TUMOR; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEM; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; COHORT STUDIES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84960364707     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: 18727727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. N.B. Delongchamps, M. Rouanne, T. Flam, and et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization of prostate cancer: combination of T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging BJU Int. 107 9 2011 1411 1418
2. C.M.A. Hoeks, J.O. Barentsz, T. Hambrock, and et al. Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging Radiology 261 1 2011 46 66
3. D. Portalez, P. Mozer, F. Cornud, and et al. Validation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in a cohort of repeat biopsy patients Eur. Urol. 62 6 2012 986 996
4. M.R. Pokorny, M. de Rooij, E. Duncan, and et al. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies Eur. Urol. 66 1 2014 22 29
5. I.G. Schoots, M.J. Roobol, D. Nieboer, C.H. Bangma, E.W. Steyerberg, and M.G.M. Hunink Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Eur. Urol. 68 2014 438 450
6. M.M. Siddiqui, S. Rais-Bahrami, B. Turkbey, and et al. Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer JAMA 313 4 2015 390 397
7. N.B. Delongchamps, M. Peyromaure, A. Schull, and et al. Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer detection: comparison of random and targeted biopsies J. Urol. 189 2 2013 493 499
8. J.O. Barentsz, J. Richenberg, R. Clements, and et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 Eur. Radiol. 22 4 2012 746 757
9. E.H. Hamoen, M. de Rooij, J.A. Witjes, J.O. Barentsz, and M.M. Rovers Use of the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) for prostate cancer detection with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: a diagnostic meta-analysis Eur. Urol. 67 2014 1112 1121
10. R. Renard-Penna, P. Mozer, F. Cornud, and et al. Prostate imaging reporting and data system and likert scoring system: multiparametric MR imaging validation study to screen patients for initial biopsy Radiology 2016 140184
11. M.C. Roethke, T.H. Kuru, S. Schultze, and et al. Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla Eur. Radiol. 24 2 2014 344 352
12. L. Schimmoller, M. Quentin, C. Arsov, and et al. Predictive power of the ESUR scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis verified with targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy Eur. J. Radiol. 83 12 2014 2103 2108
13. A.D.J. Baur, A. Maxeiner, T. Franiel, and et al. Evaluation of the prostate imaging reporting and data system for the detection of prostate cancer by the results of targeted biopsy of the prostate Investig. Radiol. 49 6 2014 411 420
14. American College of Radiology, MR Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.02014.
15. P. Zamecnik, M.G. Schouten, A.J. Krafft, and et al. Automated real-time needle-guide tracking for fast 3-T MR-guided transrectal prostate biopsy: a feasibility study Radiology 273 3 2014 879 886
16. Z. Yang, and M. Zhou Kappa statistic for clustered matched-pair data Stat. Med. 33 15 2014 2612 2633
17. M. Pepe, G. Longton, and H. Janes Estimation and comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves Stata J. 9 1 2009 1
18. T. Franiel, C. Stephan, A. Erbersdobler, and et al. Areas suspicious for prostate cancer: MR-guided biopsy in patients with at least one transrectal US-guided biopsy with a negative finding - multiparametric MR imaging for detection and biopsy planning Radiology 259 1 2011 162 172
19. L. Schimmoller, M. Quentin, C. Arsov, and et al. Inter-reader agreement of the ESUR score for prostate MRI using in-bore MRI-guided biopsies as the reference standard Eur. Radiol. 23 11 2013 3185 3190
20. E.A.M. Heijnsdijk, E.M. Wever, A. Auvinen, and et al. Quality-of-life effects of prostate-specific antigen screening N. Engl. J. Med. 367 7 2012 595 605
21. S. Loeb, M.A. Bjurlin, J. Nicholson, and et al. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer Eur. Urol. 65 6 2014 1046 1055
22. H.A. Vargas, A.M. Hötker, D.A. Goldman, and et al. Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference Eur. Radiol. 2015 1 7
23. B.G. Muller, J.H. Shih, S. Sankineni, and et al. Prostate cancer: interobserver agreement and accuracy with the revised prostate imaging reporting and data system at multiparametric MR imaging Radiology 277 3 2015 741 750