Lectotypification of the name of the sacred tree Ficus religiosa (Moraceae)

Taxon

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 158-162

  Ferrer Gallego, P Pablo ^a   Boisset, Fernando ^b   Upadhyay, Gautam Kumar ^c  

^a Servicio de Vida Silvestre   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^c BOTANICAL SURVEY OF INDIA   (India)

Author keywords

Ficus; Lectotype; Linnaeus; Nomenclature; Paul Hermann s herbarium

Indexed keywords

DECIDUOUS TREE; HERBARIUM; LEAF; MORPHOLOGY; MUSEUM; NOMENCLATURE; TAXONOMY; TYPE SPECIMEN;

FICUS (ANGIOSPERM); FICUS RELIGIOSA; MORACEAE;

EID: 84960336190     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: 19968175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12705/651.12     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Berg, C.C. 2003. Flora Malesiana precursor for the treatment of Moraceae 1: The main subdivision of Ficus; The subgenera. Blumea 48: 167-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651903x686132
2. Berg, C.C. 2004. Flora Malesiana precursor for the treatment of Moraceae 7: Ficus subgenus Urostigma.Blumea 49: 463-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651904X484423
3. Berg, C.C. & Corner, E.J.H. 2005. Moraceae (Ficus). Pp. 1-730 in: Noteboom, H.P. (ed.), Flora Malesiana, ser. 1, vol. 17. Leiden: National Herbarium of Nederland.
4. Browicz, K. 1982. Moraceae. Pp. 1-15 in: Rechinger, K.H. (ed.), Flora Iranica, vol. 153. Graz: Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt.
5. Chantarasuwan, B., Berg, C.C. & Van Welzen, P.C. 2013. A revision of Ficus subsection Urostigma (Moraceae). Syst. Bot. 38: 653-686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1600/036364413X670241
6. Chaudhary, L.B., Sudhakar, J.V., Kumar, A., Bajpai, O., Tiwari, R. & Murthy, G.V.S. 2012. Synopsis of the Genus Ficus L. (Moraceae) in India. Taiwania 57: 193-216.
7. Cook, J.M. & Rasplus, J.-I. 2003. Mutualists with attitude: Coevolving fig wasps and figs. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 241-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00062-4
8. Corner, E.J.H. 1959. Taxonomic notes on Ficus Linn., Asia and Australasia. I. Subg. Urostigma (Gasp.) Miq. Gard. Bull. Singapore 17: 368-404.
9. Corner, E.J.H. 1965. Check-list of Ficus in Asia and Australasia with keys to identification. Gard. Bull. Singapore 21: 1-186.
10. Cowen, D.V. 1952. Flowering trees and shrubs in India, 2nd, rev. ed. Bombay: Thacker.
11. Datwyler, S.L. & Weiblen, G.D. 2004. On the origin of the fig: Phylogenetic relationships of Moraceae from ndhF sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 91: 767-777. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.5.767
12. Frodin, D.G. 2004. History and concepts of big plant genera. Taxon 53: 753-776. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4135449
13. Galil, J. 1984. Ficus religiosa L.-The tree-splitter. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 88: 185-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1984.tb01570.x
14. Ghafoor, A. 1985. Moraceae. Pp. 1-54 in: Nasir, E. & Ali, S.I., Flora of Pakistan, vol. 171. Karachi: Department of Botany, University of Karachi.
15. Gombrich, R.F. 2006. Theravada Buddhism: A social history from ancient Benares to modern Colombo, 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.
16. Harrison, R.T. 2005. Figs and the diversity of tropical forests. BioScience 55: 1053-1064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[1053:FATDOT]2. 0.CO;2
17. Harvey, P. 2013. An introduction to Buddhism: Teaching, history and practices, 2d ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Hermann, P. 1698. Paradisus batavus. Lugduni Batavorum [Leiden]:. apud Abrahamum Elzevier. http://bibdigital.rjb.csic.es/ing/Libro.php?Libro=4756
19. Herre, E.A., Jandér, K.C. & Machado, C.A. 2008. Evolutionary ecology of figs and their associates: Recent progress and outstanding puzzles. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 39: 439-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110232
20. Jansen, D.H. 1979. How to be a Fig. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10: 13-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.000305
21. Jarvis, C. 2007. Order out of chaos: Linnaean plant names and their types. London: Linnean Society of London and the Natural History Museum.
22. Jousselin, E., Rasplus, J.-I. & Kjellberg, F. 2003. Convergence and coevolution in a mutualism: Evidence from a molecular phylogeny of Ficus. Evolution 57: 1255-1269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00334.x
23. King, G. 1888. Ficus. Pp. 494-537 in: Hooker, J.D. (ed.), The Flora of British India, vol. 5. London: Reeve, 1890. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.678
24. Kumar, A., Bajpai, O., Mishra, A.K., Sahu, N., Behera, S.K. & Chaudary, L.B. 2011. Assessment of diversity in the genus Ficus L. (Moraceae) of Katerniaghat Wildlife Sanctuary, Uttar Pradesh, India. Amer. J. Pl. Sci. 2: 78-92.
25. Lewington, A. & Parker, E. 1999. Fig: Sacred tree of the Old World. Pp. 161-165 in: Lewington, A. & Parker, E., Ancient trees: Trees that live for 1000 Years. London: Collins & Brown.
26. Linnaeus, C. 1738 ("1737"). Hortus cliffortianus. Amstelaedami [Amsterdam]. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.690
27. Linnaeus, C. 1747. Flora zeylanica. Holmiae [Stockholm]: sumtu et literis Laurentii Salvii. http://bibdigital.rjb.csic.es/ing/Libro.php?Libro=1565
28. Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species plantarum, vol. 2. Holmiae [Stockholm]: impensis Laurentii Salvii. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.669
29. Linnaeus, C. 1749. Amoenitates Academicae, vol. 1. Holmiae [Stockholm] et Lipsiae [Leipzig]: apud Godofredum Kiesewetter. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.910
30. Plukenet, L. 1692. Phytographia, vol. 3. Londini [London]: sumptibus autoris. http://bibdigital.rjb.csic.es/ing/Libro.php?Libro=4827
31. Plukenet, L. 1696. Almagestum botanicum. Londini [London]: sumptibus autoris. http://bibdigital.rjb.csic.es/ing/Libro.php?Libro=1572
32. Rheede tot Draakestein, H.A. van 1678. Hortus indicus malabaricus ["Horti malabarici "], pars prima. Amstelaedami [Amsterdam]: sumptibus viduae Ioannis van Someren, etc. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.707
33. Rønsted, N., Weiblen, G.D., Savolainen, V. & Cook, J.M. 2008. Phylogeny, biogeography, and ecology of Ficus section Malvanthera (Moraceae). Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 48: 12-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.04.005
34. Singh, D., Singh, B. & Kumar Goel, R. 2011. Traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology of Ficus religiosa: A review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 134: 565-583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2011.01.046
35. Sitaranam, V., Jog, S.R. & Tetali, P. 2009. Ecology of Ficus religiosa accounts for its association with religion. Curr. Sci. 97: 637-640.
36. Trimen, H. 1887. Hermann's Ceylon herbarium and Linnaeus's 'Flora zeylanica'. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 24: 129-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1887.tb01319.x
37. Van Ooststroom, S.J. 1937. Hermann's collection of Ceylon plants in the Rijksherbarium (National herbarium) at Leyden. Blumea Suppl. 1: 193-209.
38. Weibes, J.T. 1979. Co-evolution of figs and their insect pollinators. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10: 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.000245
39. Weiblen, G.D. 2004. Correlated evolution in fig pollination. Syst. Biol. 53: 128-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10635150490265012
40. Weiblen, G.D. & Bush, G.L. 2002. Speciation in fig pollinators and parasites. Molec. Ecol. 11: 1573-1578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01529.x
41. Wu, Z., Zhou, Z.-K. & Gilber, M.G. 2003. Moraceae. Pp. 21-73 in: Wu, Z., Raven, P.H. & Hong, D.Y., Flora of China, vol. 5. Beijing: Science Press; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.
42. Zook, D. 2010. Tropical rainforests as dynamic symbiospheres of life. Symbiosis 51: 27-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13199-010-0071-5