Corpus Informed Discourse Analysis: The Case of Academic Engagement

Academic Writing: at the Interface of Corpus and Discourse

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 110-128

  Hyland, Ken ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84960304591     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
2. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
3. Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
4. Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text, 9, 93–124.
5. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.
6. Bondi, M. (1999). English across genres: Language variation in the discourse of economics. Modena: Edizioni Il Fiorino.
7. Downing, A., & Locke, P. (1992). A university course in English grammar. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.
8. Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (Eds). (2000). Evaluation in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Hyland, K. (1999). Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In C.N. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 99–121). London: Longman.
10. Hyland, K. (2001). Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic writing. Written Communication, 18, 549–574.
11. Hyland, K. (2002a). What do they mean? Questions in academic writing. Text, 22, 529–557.
12. Hyland, K. (2002b). Directives: Power and engagement in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 23, 215–239.
13. Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
14. Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.
15. Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1994). A communicative grammar of English (2nd edn). London: Longman.
16. Martin, J. (2000). Beyond exchange: appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142–175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Martin, J.R., & White, P.R.R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Perkins, M. (1983). Modal expressions in English. London: Frances Pinter.
19. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (1995). Intercultural communication. London: Blackwell.
20. Swales, J. (2004). Research genres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, 22, 58–78.
22. Webber, P. (1994). The function of questions in different medical English genres. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 257–268.