Exploring the national contexts and cultural ideas that preceded the Landscape Character Assessment method in England

Landscape Research

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 175-185

  Sarlöv Herlin, Ingrid ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

conservation and planning history; European Landscape Convention; Landscape Character Assessment; national context

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; CULTURAL RELATIONS; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT;

ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84960292108     PISSN: 01426397     EISSN: 14699710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2015.1135317     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. M.Amati,, & L.Taylor, (2010). From green belts to green infrastructure. Planning Practice & Research, 25, 143–155.
2. J.F.Benson,, & M.H.Roe, (Eds.). (2007). Landscape and sustainability (2nd ed.). Oxford: Routledge.
3. K.Bishop,, & A.Philips, (Eds.). (2004). Countryside planning — New approaches to management and conservation. London: Earthscan.
4. G.Brunetta,, & A.Voghera, (2008). Evaluating landscape for shared values: Tools, principles & methods. Landscape Research, 33, 71–87.
5. D.Bruns,, & O.Kühne, (2013). Landschaften: Theorie, Praxis und Internationale Bezüge [Landscapes; Theory, Praxis and International Context]. Schwerin: Oceano.
6. A.Butler,, & U.Berglund, (2014). Landscape Character Assessment as an approach to understanding public interests within the European Landscape Convention. Landscape Research, 39(3), 219–236.
7. G.Clark, (2007). The long march of history: Farm wages, population, and economic growth, England 1209–1869. The Economic History Review, 60, 97–135.10.1111/ehr.2007.60.issue-1
8. Council of Europe. (2000). European Landscape Convention, Florence, European Treaty Series — No. 176. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
9. Council of Europe. (2015). Linguistic version of the convention. Retrieved September 18, 2015, from http://www.coe.int/en/web/landscape/text-of-the-explanatory-report-of-the-european-landscape-convention
10. N.Curry, (1994). Countryside recreation, access and land use planning. London: Spon Press.
11. N.Curry, (2008). Leisure in the landscape: Rural incomes and public benefits. In A.Bonn, T.Allott, K.Hubacek, & J.Stewart (Eds.), Drivers of environmental change in uplands, 277–290. London: Routledge.
12. N.Fairbrother, (1970). New lives, new landscapes: Planning for the 21st century. New York, NY: Knopf.
13. G.J.Fairclough, (2002). Chapter 1: Europe’s landscape — Archaeology, sustainability and agriculture. In G.FaircloughGraham and S.RipponStephen (Eds.), Europe’s cultural landscape: Archaeologists and the management of change (pp. 25–37). EAC Occasional Paper no 2. Brussels: EAC.
14. G.J.Fairclough, (2003). The long chain: Archaeology, historical landscape characterisation and time depth in the landscape. In H.Palang & G.Fry (Eds.), Landscape interfaces: Cultural heritage in changing landscapes, (pp. 295–318). Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-0189-1
15. G.Fairclough, & I.Sarlov-Herlin,. (2005). The meaning of ‘countryside’: what are we trying to sustain? In D.McCollin, & J.I.Jackson (Eds.), Planning, people and practice: The landscape ecology of sustainable landscapes. Proceedings of the 13th Annual IALE (UK) conference held at The University of Northampton (pp. 11–19). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
16. G.J.Fairclough, (2006). A new landscape for cultural heritage management. Characterisation as a management tool. I. In L.Lozny (Red.), Landscapes under pressure: Theory and practice of cultural heritage research and preservation, (pp. 55–74). New York, NY: Springer.
17. G.J.Fairclough (2010). Landscape and spatial planning in England: Past achievements, present questions, future goals. In K.Gawro′nski & J.Herznik (Eds.), Planowanie i zagospodarowanie przestrzenne jako instrument kształtowania krajobrazów kulturowych [Spatial planning and development as an instrument for shaping cultural landscapes] (pp. 125–140). Krakow: Branta.
18. G.Fairclough, & P.Herring, (2016). Lens, mirror, window: Interactions between Historic Landscape Characterisation and Landscape Character Assessment. Landscape Research, 41, (2).
19. G.J.Fairclough,, & I.Sarlöv Herlin, (2005). The meaning of “countryside”: What are we trying to sustain? In D.McCollin & J.I.Jackson (Eds.), Planning, people and practice. The landscape ecology of sustainable landscapes. IALE (UK) (pp. 11–19). Northampton: University of Northampton.
20. A.Goudie, (1972). Vaughan Cornish: Geographer (with a bibliography of his published works). Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 55, 1–16.
21. M.Hebbert, (1999). A city in good shape: Town planning and public health. Town Planning Review. Subject Social Sciences, Politics and Society Issue, 70, 433–453.
22. E.Holdaway,, & G.Smart, (2001). Landscapes at risk. The future for areas of outstanding natural beauty. London: Spon Press.
23. W.G.Hoskins, (1955). The making of the English landscape (new edition 2005). London: Hodder and Stoughton.
24. International Union for Conservation of Nature. (1994). Guidelines for protected areas management categories. Cambridge: IUCN.
25. P.James,, & J.W.Gittins, (2007). Local Landscape Character Assessment: An evaluation of community-led schemes in Cheshire. Landscape Research, 32, 423–442.10.1080/01426390701449794
26. L.H.Jensen, (2006). Changing conceptualization of landscape in English landscape assessment methods. In B.Tress, G.Tres, G.Fry, & P.Opdam (Eds.), From landscape research to landscape planning: Aspects of integration, education and application. Series: Wageningen UR frontis series (Vol. 12, XI, 434 p.). Dordrecht: Springer
27. R.Muir, (2001). Approaches to landscape. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, Incorporated.
28. Natural England. (2014). National character area profiles: Data for local decision making. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-character-area-profiles-data-for-local-decision-makingon17/09/15
29. Office for National Statistics. (2013). 170 years of industrial change across England and Wales. Part of 2011 census analysis, 170 years of industry release released: 05 June 2013. Retrieved February 24, 2015, from http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/census/2011-census-analysis/170-years-of-industry/170-years-of-industrial-changeponent.html
30. K.R.Olwig, (2002). Landscape, nature, and the body politic. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
31. K.R.Olwig, (2005a). Editorial: Law, polity and the changing meaning of landscape. Landscape Research, 30, 293–298.10.1080/01426390500165369
32. K.R.Olwig, (2005b). The landscape of “customary” law versus that of “natural” law. Landscape Research, 30, 299–320.10.1080/01426390500165385
33. A.Phillips,, & R.Clarke, (2004). Our landscape from a wider perspective. In K.Bishop & A.Phillips (Eds.), Countryside planning: New approaches to management and conservation (pp. 49–67). London: Earthscan.
34. D.Robinson,, I.Laurie,, J.Wager,, & A.Trail, (1976). Landscape evaluation. Manchester: Centre for Urban and Regional Research, University of Manchester.
35. I.Sarlöv Herlin, (2012). Landskap för mångbruk: Erfarenheter från England [Landscape for multiple use. Experiences from England]. Stockholm: FORMAS.
36. I.Sarlöv-Herlin,, & G.Fairclough, (2013). Introduction to “Experiences of landscape identification and assessment: National, regional and local levels” — Methods: Scales and levels. 13th Council of Europe Meeting of the Workshops for the Implementation of the European Landscape Convention. Workshop Presentation. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
37. P.Selman, (2006). Planning at the landscape scale. London: Routledge.
38. P.Selman,, & C.Swanwick, (2010). On the meaning of natural beauty in landscape legislation. Landscape Research, 35, 3–26.10.1080/01426390903407160
39. J.Sheail, (1998). Nature conservation in Britain. The formative years. London: The Stationery Office.
40. C.Swanwick, (2002). Landscape Character Assessment guidance. Topic paper 1. Recent practice and the evolution of Landscape Character Assessment. Edinburgh: Countryside Agency, Cheltenham and Scottish Natural Heritage.
41. C.Swanwick, (2003). Landscape Character Assessment guidance. Topic paper 6. Techniques and criteria for judging sensitivity and capacity. Edinburgh: Countryside Agency, Cheltenham and Scottish Natural Heritage.
42. C.Swanwick, (2004). The assessment of countryside and landscape character in England: An overview. In K.Bishop & A.Phillips (Eds.), Countryside planning: New approaches to management and conservation, 109–123. London: Earthscan.
43. C.Swanwick,, & Land Use Consultants. (2002). Landscape Character Assessment — Guidance for England and Scotland CAX 84. Edinburgh: Countryside Agency, Cheltenham and Scottish Natural Heritage.
44. I.Thomson, (2010). The English lakes: A history. London: Bloomsbury.
45. C.Tudor, (2014). An approach to landscape character assessment. Retrieved from Natural England website https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/396192/landscape-character-assessment.pdf
46. S.Warnock,, & G.Griffiths, (2015). Landscape characterisation: The living landscapes approach in the UK. Landscape Research, 40, 261–278.10.1080/01426397.2013.870541
47. G.Warren, (2011). C. Henry Warren: A contented countryman? Landscapes, 12(1), 1–23.
48. D.Wascher, (Ed.). (2005). European landscape character areas. Typologies, cartography and indicators for the assessment of sustainable landscapes. Final report as deliverable form the EU’s accompanying measure project European Landscape Character Assessment Initiative (ELCAI), funded under the 5th Framework Programme on energy, environment and sustainable development.
49. C.Williams-Ellis, (1928). England and the octopus. London: Geoffrey Bles.
50. C.Williams-Ellis, (Ed.). (1938). Britain and the beast. London: Dent.