A compositional and interpretable semantic space

NAACL HLT 2015 - 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 32-41

  Fyshe, Alona ^a   Wehbe, Leila ^a   Talukdar, Partha ^b   Murphy, Brian ^c   Mitchell, Tom ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

^c QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS;

INTERPRETABILITY; SEMANTIC COMPOSITION; SEMANTIC SPACE; SINGLE WORDS; VECTOR SPACE MODELS;

VECTOR SPACES;

EID: 84960191981     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/v1/n15-1004     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Marco Baroni and Roberto Zamparelli. Nouns are vectors, adjectives are matrices: Representing adjective-noun constructions in semantic space. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1183-1193. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010.
2. Stephen Boyd. Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 3(1):1-122, 2010. ISSN 1935-8237. doi: 10.1561/2200000016.
3. Jamie Callan and Mark Hoy. The ClueWeb09 Dataset, 2009. URL http://boston.lti.cs.cmu.edu/Data/clueweb09/.
4. Jonathan Chang, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Sean Gerrish, Chong Wang, and David M Blei. Reading Tea Leaves : How Humans Interpret Topic Models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 1-9, 2009.
5. Scott Deerwester, Susan T. Dumais, George W. Furnas, Thomas K. Landauer, and Richard Harshman. Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6):391-407, 1990.
6. S Dejong. SIMPLS-An alternative approach to partial least squares regression. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 18(3):251-263, 1993. ISSN 01697439. doi: 10.1016/0169-7439(93)85002-x.
7. Georgiana Dinu, Nghia The Pham, and Marco Baroni. General estimation and evaluation of compositional distributional semantic models. In Workshop on Continuous Vector Space Models and their Compositionality, Sofia, Bulgaria, 2013.
8. Bradley Efron, Trevor Hastie, Iain Johnstone, and Robert Tibshirani. Least angle regression. Annals of Statistics, 32(2):407-499, 2004.
9. Alona Fyshe, Partha Talukdar, Brian Murphy, and Tom Mitchell. Documents and Dependencies : an Exploration of Vector Space Models for Semantic Composition. In Computational Natural Language Learning, Sofia, Bulgaria, 2013.
10. Kazuma Hashimoto, Pontus Stenetorp, Makoto Miwa, and Yoshimasa Tsuruoka. Jointly learning word representations and composition functions using predicate-argument structures. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods on Natural Language Processing, pages 1544-1555, 2014.
11. Paul B. Kantor and Ellen M. Voorhees. The TREC-5 Confusion Track: Comparing Retrieval Methods for Scanned Text. Information Retrieval, 2:165-176, 2000. ISSN 1386-4564, 1573-7659. doi: 10.1023/A:1009902609570.
12. Omer Levy and Yoav Goldberg. Neural Word Embedding as Implicit Matrix Factorization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 1-9, 2014.
13. Julien Mairal, Francis Bach, J Ponce, and Guillermo Sapiro. Online learning for matrix factorization and sparse coding. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11:19-60, 2010.
14. Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeff Dean. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 1-9, 2013.
15. Jeff Mitchell and Mirella Lapata. Composition in distributional models of semantics. Cognitive science, 34(8):1388-429, November 2010. ISSN 1551-6709. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01106.x.
16. Brian Murphy, Partha Talukdar, and Tom Mitchell. Learning Effective and Interpretable Semantic Models using Non-Negative Sparse Embedding. In Proceedings of Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), 2012.
17. Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher D Manning. GloVe : Global Vectors for Word Representation. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Doha, Qatar, 2014.
18. Magnus Sahlgren. The Word-Space Model Using distributional analysis to represent syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations between words. Doctor of philosophy, Stockholm University, 2006.
19. Richard Socher, Brody Huval, Christopher D. Manning, and Andrew Y. Ng. Semantic Compositionality through Recursive Matrix-Vector Spaces. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, 2012.
20. Peter D Turney. Domain and Function : A Dual-Space Model of Semantic Relations and Compositions. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 44:533-585, 2012.