"I Like it!" Preference Actions Separated from Hedonic Reactions

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 213-232

  Booth, David A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FOOD PREFERENCE; QUANTITATIVE RESULT; QUESTIONNAIRE A;

FOOD TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84960154576     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joss.12205     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Ashby, F.G. and Ennis, D.M. 2002. A Thurstone-Coombs model of concurrent ratings with sensory and liking dimensions. J. Sensory Studies 17, 43-59.
2. Bartoshuk, L.M., Snyder, D.J. and Duffy, V.B. 2006. Hedonic gLMS: Valid comparisons for food liking/disliking across obesity, age, sex and PROP status. Chem. Sens. 31, A50.
3. Berridge, K.C. 1996. Food reward: Brain substrates of wanting and liking. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 90, 36-42.
4. Booth, D.A. 1976. Approaches to feeding control. In Appetite and food intake (T. Silverstone, ed.) pp. 417-478, Abakon/Dahlem Konferenzen, West Berlin, FRG.
5. Booth, D.A. 1988a. Practical measurement of the strengths of actual influences on what consumers do: Scientific brand design. J. Market Res. Soc. (UK) 30, 127-146.
6. Booth, D.A. 1988b. Estimating JNDs from ratings. [Abstract: AChemS-10] Chem. Sens. 13, 675-676.
7. Booth, D.A. 1990. Designing products for individual customers. In Psychological Bases of Sensory Evaluation (R.L. Mcbride & H.J.H. Macfie, eds.) pp. 163-193, Elsevier Applied Science, London, UK.
8. Booth, D.A. 1991. Learned ingestive motivation and the pleasures of the palate. In The Hedonics of Taste (R.C. Bolles, ed.) pp. 29-58, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
9. Booth, D.A. 1995. Cognitive processes in odorant mixture assessment. Chem. Sens. 20, 639-643.
10. Booth, D.A. 2009a. Lines, dashed lines and "scale" ex-tricks. Objective measurements of appetite versus subjective tests of intake. Appetite 53, 434-437.
11. Booth, D.A. 2009b. The basics of quantitative judgment. How to rate the strength of appetite for food and its sating. Appetite 53, 438-441.
12. Booth, D.A. 2014. Measuring sensory and marketing influences on consumers' choices among food and beverage product brands. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 35, 129-137.
13. Booth, D.A. 2015. Scientific measurement of sensory preferences using stimulus tetrads. J. Sensory Stud. In press.
14. Booth, D.A. and Blair, A.J. 1989. Objective factors in the appeal of a brand during use by the individual consumer. In Food Acceptability (D.M.H. Thomson, ed.) pp. 329-346, Elsevier Applied Science, London, U.K.
15. Booth, D.A. and Conner, M.T. 1991. Characterisation and measurement of influences on food acceptability by analysis of choice differences: Theory and practice. Food Qual. Pref. 2, 75-85.
16. Booth, D.A. and Conner, M.T. 2009. Salt in bread. J. Food Sci. 74, vii-viii.
17. Booth, D.A. and Freeman, R.P.J. 1993. Discriminative feature integration by individuals. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 84, 1-16.
18. Booth, D.A. and Shepherd, R. 1988. Sensory influences on food acceptance - The neglected approach to nutrition promotion. BNF Nutr. Bull. 13, 39-54.
19. Booth, D.A., Mather, P. and Fuller, J. 1982. Starch content of ordinary foods associatively conditions human appetite and satiation, indexed by intake and eating pleasantness of starch-Paired flavours. Appetite 3, 163-184.
20. Booth, D.A., Thompson, A.L. and Shahedian, B. 1983. A robust, brief measure of an individual's most preferred level of salt in an ordinary foodstuff. Appetite 4, 301-312.
21. Booth, D.A., Mobini, S., Earl, T. and Wainwright, C.J. 2003a. Consumer-specified instrumental quality of short-dough cookie texture using penetrometry and break force. J. Food Sci. Sens. Nutr. Qual. Food 68, 382-387.
22. Booth, D.A., Mobini, S., Earl, T. and Wainwright, C.J. 2003b. Market-optimum instrumental values from individual consumers' discriminations of standard sensory quality of the texture of short-dough biscuits. J. Food Qual. 26, 425-439.
23. Booth, D.A., Higgs, S., Schneider, J. and Klinkenberg, I. 2010. Learnt liking versus inborn delight. Can sweetness give sensual pleasure or is it just motivating? Psychol. Sci. 21, 1656-1663.
24. Booth, D.A., O'Leary, G., Li, L. and Higgs, S. 2011a. Aversive viscerally referred states and thirst accompanying the sating of hunger motivation by rapid digestion of glucosaccharides. Physiol. Behav. 102, 373-381.
25. Booth, D.A., Sharpe, O. and Conner, M.T. 2011b. Discrimination without description of differences. Implicit or fully subconscious? http://epapers.bham.ac.uk/682/(accessed March 18, 2015).
26. Booth, D.A., Sharpe, O. and Conner, M.T. 2011c. Differential gustatory sensitivity to caffeine in normal use points to supertasters, tasters and non-tasters. Chemosens. Perc. 4, 154-169.
27. Booth, D.A., Sharpe, O., Freeman, R.P.J. and Conner, M.T. 2011d. Insight into sight, touch, taste and smell by multiple discriminations from norm. See. Perc. 24, 485-511.
28. Bowman, S.J., Booth, D.A., Platts, R.G. and the UK Sjögren's Interest Group. 2004. Measurement of fatigue and discomfort in primary Sjögren's syndrome using a new questionnaire tool. Rheumatol 43, 758-764.
29. Cabanac, M. 1971. Physiological role of pleasure. Science 193, 1103-1107.
30. Cardello, A. and Schutz, H.G. 2004. Research note. Numerical scale-point locations for constructing the LAM (labeled affective magnitude) scale. J. Sensory Stud. 19, 341-346.
31. Cardello, A.V., Schutz, H.G., Snow, C. and Lesher, L. 2000. Predictors of food acceptance, consumption and satisfaction in specific eating situations. Food Qual. Pref. 11, 201-216.
32. Cardello, A., Lawless, H.T. and Schutz, H.G. 2008. Effects of extreme anchors and interior label spacing on labeled affective magnitude scales. Food Qual. Pref. 19, 473-480
33. Conner, M.T. and Booth, D.A. 1988. Preferred sweetness of a lime drink and preference for sweet over non-sweet foods, related to sex and reported age and body weight. Appetite 10, 25-35.
34. Conner, M.T. and Booth, D.A. 1992. Combining measurement of food taste and consumer preference in the individual: reliability, precision and stability data. J. Food Qual. 15, 1-17.
35. Conner, M.T., Haddon, A.V. and Booth, D.A. 1986. Very rapid, precise measurement of effects of constituent variation on product acceptability: consumer sweetness preferences in a lime drink. Lebens.-Wiss. u. -Technol. Food Sci. Technol. 19, 486-490.
36. Conner, M.T., Booth, D.A., Clifton, V.J. and Griffiths, R.P. 1988a. Individualized optimization of the salt content of white bread for acceptability. J. Food Sci. 53, 549-554.
37. Conner, M.T., Haddon, A.V., Pickering, E.S. and Booth, D.A. 1988b. Sweet tooth demonstrated: individual differences in preference for both sweet foods and foods highly sweetened. J. Appl. Psychol. 73, 275-280.
38. Conner, M.T., Land, D.G. and Booth, D.A. 1987. Effects of stimulus range on judgments of sweetness intensity in a lime drink. Br. J. Psychol. 78, 357-364.
39. Conner, M.T., Pickering, E.S., Birkett, R.J. and Booth, D.A. 1994. Using an individualised attribute tolerance model in consumer acceptability tests. Food Qual. Pref. 5, 225-232.
40. Cordonner, S.M. and Delwiche, J.F. 2008. An alternative method for assessing liking. Positional relative rating versus the 9-point hedonic scale. J. Sensory Stud. 23, 284-292.
41. Ellermeier, W. and Faulhammer, G. 2000. Empirical evaluation of axioms fundamental to Stevens's ratio-scaling approach: I. Loudness production. Perc. Psychophys. 62, 1505-1511.
42. Finlayson, G., King, N. and Blundell, J.E. 2007. Is it possible to dissociate 'liking' and 'wanting' for foods in humans? A novel experimental procedure. Physiol. Behav. 90, 36-42.
43. Freeman, R.P.J. and Booth, D.A. 2010. Users of 'diet' drinks who think that sweetness is calories. Appetite 55, 152-155.
44. Freeman, R.P.J., Richardson, N.J., Kendal-Reed, M.S. and Booth, D.A. 1993. Bases of a cognitive technology for food quality. Br. Food J. 95, 37-44.
45. Goodchild, C.E., Platts, R.G., Treharne, G.J. and Booth, D.A. 2005. Excessive negative affect and deficient positive affect in anxiety and depression: balancing the valences in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Health Psychol. Update 14, 45-50.
46. Goodchild, C.E., Treharne, G.J., Booth, D.A., Kitas, G.D., and Bowman, S.J. 2008. Measuring fatigue among women with Sjögren's syndrome or rheumatoid arthritis: A comparison of the Profile of Fatigue (ProF) and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI). Musculoskel. Care 6, 31-48.
47. Harris, G. and Booth, D.A. 1987. Infants' preference for salt in food: Its dependence upon recent dietary experience. J. Reprod. Infant Psychol. 5, 97-104.
48. Hofmann, W., VAN Koningsbruggen, G.M., Stroebe, W., Ramanathan, S. and Aarts, H. 2010. As pleasure unfolds: hedonic responses to tempting food. Psychol. Sci. 21, 1863-1870.
49. Jaeger, S.R., Wakeling, I.N. and Macfie, H.J.H. 2000. Behavioural extensions to preference mapping: The role of synthesis. Food Qual. Pref. 11, 349-359.
50. Jones, L.V., Peryam, D.R., and Thurstone, L.L. 1955. Development of a scale for measuring soldiers' food preferences. Food Res. 20, 512-520.
51. Knibb, R.C., Smith, D.M., Booth, D.A., Armstrong, A.M., Platts, R.G., Macdonald, A. and Booth, I.W. 2001. No unique role of nausea attributed to eating a food in the recalled acquisition of sensory aversion to that food. Appetite 36, 225-234.
52. Macht, M. 2008. How emotions affect eating: A five-way model. Appetite 50, 1-11.
53. Laurier, E. and Wiggins, S. 2011. Finishing the family meal. The interactional organisation of satiety. Appetite 36, 53-64.
54. Lawless, H.T., Cardello, A.V., Chapman, K. W., Leshner, L.L., Given, Z. and Schutz, H.G. 2010a. A comparison of the effectiveness of hedonic scales and end-anchor compression effects. J. Sensory Stud. 25(Suppl. 1), 18-34.
55. Lawless, H.T., Popper, R. and Kroll, B.J. 2010b. A comparison of the labeled magnitude (LAM) scale, an 11-point category scale and the traditional 9-point hedonic scale. Food Qual. Pref. 21, 4-12.
56. Lawless, H.T., Sinopoli, D., & Chapman, K.W. 2010c. A comparison of the labeled affective magnitude scale and the 9-point hedonic scale and examination of categorical behavior. J. Sensory Stud. 25(Suppl. 1), 54-66.
57. Lim, J. 2011. Hedonic scaling. A review of methods and theory. Food Qual. Pref. 22, 733-747.
58. Mcbride, R.L. and Booth, D.A. 1986. Using classical psychophysics to determine ideal flavour intensity. J. Food Technol. 21, 775-780.
59. Moskowitz, H. 2002. Knowledge building and optimization strategies for a product used in different carriers. J. Sensory Stud. 17, 327-349.
60. Moskowitz, H.R. and Sidel, J.L. 1971. Magnitude and hedonic scales of food acceptability. J. Food Sci. 36, 677-680.
61. Mottram, D.S. 1998. Chemical tainting of foods. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 33, 19-29.
62. Nicolas, L., Marquilly, C. and O'Mahony, M. 2010. The 9-point hedonic scale. Are words and numbers compatible? Food Qual. Pref. 21, 1008-1015.
63. Parducci, A. 1965. Category judgment: A range-frequency model. Psychol. Rev. 72, 407-418.
64. Peryam, D.R. and Giradot, N.F. 1952. Advanced taste test method. Food Eng. 24, 58-61, 194.
65. Peryam, D.R. and Haynes, J.G. 1957. Prediction of soldiers' food preferences by laboratory methods. J. Appl. Psychol. 41, 2-6.
66. Peryam, D.R. and Pilgrim, F.J. 1957. Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Food Technol. 11, 9-14.
67. Poulton, E.C. 1989. Bias in Quantifying Judgments, Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Hove, UK.
68. Riskey, D.R., Parducci, A. and Beauchamp, G.K. 1979. Effects of context on judgments of sweetness and pleasantness. Perc. Psychophys. 26, 171-176.
69. Rosenstein, D. and Oster, H. 1988. Differential facial responses to four basic tastes in newborns. Child Dev. 59, 1555-1568.
70. Sauter, D. 2010. More than happy: The need for disentangling positive emotions. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 19, 36-40.
71. Schutz, H.G. 1965. A food action scale for measuring food acceptance. J. Food Sci. 30, 365-374.
72. Schutz, H.G. and Cardello, A.V. 2001. A labeled affective magnitude (LAM) scale for assessing food liking/disliking. J. Sensory Stud. 16, 117-159.
73. Steiner, J.E., Glaser, D., Hawilo, M.E. and Berridge, K.C. (2001). Comparative expression of hedonic impact: affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primates. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25, 53-74.
74. Stevens, S.S. 1957. On the psychophysical law. Psychol. Rev. 64, 153-181.
75. Thompson, R.F. and Spencer, W.A. 1966. Habituation: A model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. Psychol. Rev. 73, 16-43.
76. Torgerson, W.S. 1958. Theory and Methods of Scaling. Wiley, New York, NY.
77. Wansink, B., Bascoul, G. and Chen, G.T. 2006. The sweet tooth hypothesis. How fruit consumption relates to snack consumption. Appetite 47, 107-110.