Testing and comparing computational approaches for identifying the language of framing in political news

NAACL HLT 2015 - 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 1472-1482

  Baumer, E P S ^a,b   Elovic, Elisha ^b   Qin, Ying Crystal ^b   Polletta, Francesca ^c   Gay, Geri K ^a,b  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^b Social Dynamics Laboratory   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH; COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH; DATA COLLECTION; FRAMING EFFECTS; HUMAN SUBJECTS; POLITICAL ISSUES; POLITICAL NEWS; POLITICAL SCIENCE;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84960145954     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/v1/n15-1171     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Eric P. S. Baumer, Francesca Polletta, Nicole Pierski, and Geri K. Gay. 2015. A Simple Intervention to Reduce Framing Effects in Perceptions of Global Climate Change. Environmental Communication (to appear).
2. Jonathan Berant, Ido Dagan, Meni Adler, and Jacob Goldberger. 2012. Efficient tree-based approximation for entailment graph learning. In Proc ACL, pages 117-125.
3. Steven Bird, Edward Loper, and Ewan Klein. 2009. Natural Language Processing with Python. O'Reilly Media Inc.
4. Amber E. Boydstun, Justin H. Gross, Philip Resnik, and Noah A. Smith. 2013. Identifying Media Frames and Frame Dynamics Within and Across Policy Issues. In New Directions in Analyzing Text as Data Workshop, London.
5. Eunsol Choi, Chenhao Tan, Lillian Lee, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and Jennifer Spindel. 2012. Hedge Detection as a Lens on Framing in the GMO Debates: A Position Paper. In Proc ACL Workshop on Extra-Propositional Aspects of Meaning in Computational Linguistics, number July, pages 70-79.
6. Dennis Chong and James N. Druckman. 2007. Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1):103-126, June.
7. M.C. De Marneffe, Bill MacCartney, and C.D. Manning. 2006. Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In Proc LREC, Genoa, Italy.
8. James N. Druckman, Jordan Fein, and Thomas J. Leeper. 2012. A Source of Bias in Public Opinion Stability. American Political Science Review, 106(02):430-454, May.
9. Robert M. Entman. 1993. Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4):51-58.
10. Norman Fairclough. 1999. Global Capitalism and Critical Awareness of Language. Language Awareness, 8(2):71-83.
11. William A. Gamson and Andre Modigliani. 1989. Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach. The American Journal of Sociology, 95(1):1-37, July.
12. William A. Gamson. 1989. News as Framing. American Behavioral Scientist, 33(2):157-161, November.
13. Erving Goffman. 1974. Frame Analysis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. Stephan Greene and Philip Resnik. 2009. More than Words: Syntactic Packaging and Implicit Sentiment. In Proc HLT, number June, pages 503-511, Boulder, CO.
15. Joan B. Hooper. 1975. On Assertive Predicates. In J. Kimball, editor, Syntax and Semantics, pages 91-124. Academic Press, New York, volume 4 edition.
16. Ken Hyland. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Continuum, London and New York.
17. Lauri Karttunen. 1971. Implicative Verbs. Language, 47(2):340-358.
18. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2003. Accurate Unlexicalized Parsing. Sapporo, Japan.
19. Rebecca Ann Lind and Colleen Salo. 2002. The Framing of Feminists and Feminism in News and Public Affairs Programs in U.S. Electronic Media. Journal of Communication, 52(1):211-228.
20. Bing Liu, Minqing Hu, and Junsheng Cheng. 2005. Opinion Observer: analyzing and comparing opinions on the Web. In Proc WWW, pages 342-351.
21. Jörg Matthes and Matthias Kohring. 2008. The Content Analysis of Media Frames: Toward Improving Reliability and Validity. Journal of Communication, 58(2):258-279.
22. Allan Paivio, John C Yuille, and Stephen A Madigan. 1968. Concreteness, Imagery, and Meaningfulness Values for 925 Nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(1).
23. Fabian Pedregosa, Gael Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort, Vincent Michel, Bertrand Thirion, Olivier Grisel, Mathieu Blondel, Peter Prettenhofer, Ron Weiss, Vincent Dubourg, Jake Vanderplas, Alexandre Passos, David Cournapeau, Matthieu Brucher, Matthieu Perrot, and Edouard Duchesnay. 2011. Scikit-learn : Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2825-2830.
24. Vincent Price, Lilach Nir, and Joseph N. Cappella. 2005. Framing Public Discussion of Gay Civil Unions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(2):171-212.
25. Marta Recasens, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and Dan Jurafsky. 2013. Linguistic Models for Analyzing and Detecting Biased Language. In Proc ACL, pages 1650-1659, Sofia, Bulgaria.
26. Ellen Riloff and Janyce Wiebe. 2003. Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions. In Proc EMNLP, pages 105-112.
27. Donald Rugg. 1941. Experiments inWording Questions: II. Public Opinion Quarterly, 5(1):91-92.
28. Donald A. Schön and Martin Rein. 1994. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. Basic Books, New York.
29. Jonathon P. Schuldt, S. H. Konrath, and N. Schwarz. 2011. "Global warming" or "climate change"?: Whether the planet is warming depends on question wording. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(1):115-124, February.
30. Rion Snow, Brendan O'Connor, Daniel Jurafsky, Andrew Y Ng, Dolores Labs, and Capp St. 2008. Cheap and Fast But is it Good? Evaluating Non-Expert Annotations for Natural Language Tasks. In Proc EMNLP, number October, pages 254-263, Honolulu, HI.
31. Peter D. Turney, Yair Neuman, Dan Assaf, and Yohai Cohen. 2011. Literal and Metaphorical Sense Identification through Concrete and Abstract Context. In Proc EMNLP, volume 2, pages 680-690, Edinburgh, Scotland.
32. Barbara W. van der Veur. 1975. Imagery Rating of 1,000 Frequently Used Words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(1):44-56.