Competing priorities in treatment decision-making: A US national survey of individuals with depression and clinicians who treat depression

BMJ Open

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Barr, Paul J ^a,b   Forcino, Rachel C ^a   Mishra, Manish ^a,b   Blitzer, Rachel ^b   Elwyn, Glyn ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CONSUMER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENIENCE SAMPLE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INSURANCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL CAPACITY; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PSYCHIATRIST; ADOLESCENT; AGED; COOPERATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DEPRESSION; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROCEDURES; PSYCHIATRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DECISION MAKING; DEPRESSION; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PSYCHIATRY; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84960145879     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009585     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Anderson IM. Meta-analytical studies on new antidepressants. Br Med Bull 2001;57:161-78.
2. Butler AC, Chapman JE, Forman EM, et al. The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Clin Psychol Rev 2006;26:17-31.
3. Barth J, Munder T, Gerger H, et al. Comparative efficacy of seven psychotherapeutic interventions for patients with depression: a network meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2013;10:e1001454.
4. Cuijpers P, Berking M, Andersson G, et al. A meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioural therapy for adult depression, alone and in comparison with other treatments. Can J Psychiatry 2013;58:376-85.
5. Richards D, Richardson T. Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2012;32:329-42.
6. Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, et al. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med 2008;358:252-60.
7. Bet PM, Hugtenburg JG, Penninx B W JH, et al. Side effects of antidepressants during long-term use in a naturalistic setting. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2013;23:1443-51.
8. Hu XH, Bull SA, Hunkeler EM, et al. Incidence and duration of side effects and those rated as bothersome with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment for depression: patient report versus physician estimate. J Clin Psychiatry 2004;65:959-65.
9. Van Schaik DJF, Klijn AFJ, van Hout HPJ, et al. Patients' preferences in the treatment of depressive disorder in primary care. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2004;26:184-9.
10. Marcus SC, Olfson M. National trends in the treatment for depression from 1998 to 2007. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010;67:1265-73.
11. Swift JK, Greenberg RP. Premature discontinuation in adult psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol 2012;80:547-59.
12. Peveler R, George C, Kinmonth A-L, et al. Effect of antidepressant drug counselling and information leaflets on adherence to drug treatment in primary care: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1999;319:612-15.
13. Cantrell CR, Eaddy MT, Shah MB, et al. Methods for evaluating patient adherence to antidepressant therapy: a real-world comparison of adherence and economic outcomes. Med Care 2006;44:300-3.
14. Pampallona S, Bollini P, Tibaldi G, et al. Patient adherence in the treatment of depression. Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:104-9.
15. Kwan BM, Dimidjian S, Rizvi SL. Treatment preference, engagement, and clinical improvement in pharmacotherapy versus psychotherapy for depression. Behav Res Ther 2010;48:799-804.
16. Rokke PD, Tomhave JA, Jocic Z. The role of client choice and target selection in self-management therapy for depression in older adults. Psychol Aging 1999;14:155-69.
17. Lin P, Campbell DG, Chaney EF, et al. The influence of patient preference on depression treatment in primary care. Ann Behav Med 2005;30:164-73.
18. Lindhiem O, Bennett CB, Trentacosta CJ, et al. Client preferences affect treatment satisfaction, completion, and clinical outcome: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2014;34:506-17.
19. Raue PJ, Schulberg HC, Lewis-Fernandez R, et al. Shared decision-making in the primary care treatment of late-life major depression: a needed new intervention? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010;25:1101-11.
20. Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Gulliver A, et al. Models in the delivery of depression care: a systematic review of randomised and controlled intervention trials. BMC Fam Pract 2008;9:25.
21. Swanson KA, Bastani R, Rubenstein LV, et al. Effect of mental health care and shared decision making on patient satisfaction in a community sample of patients with depression. Med Care Res Rev 2007;64:416-30.
22. Solberg LI, Crain AL, Rubenstein L, et al. How much shared decision making occurs in usual primary care of depression? J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:199-208.
23. Young HN, Bell RA, Epstein RM, et al. Physicians' shared decision-making behaviors in depression care. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1404-8.
24. Simmons MB, Hetrick SE, Jorm AF. Experiences of treatment decision making for young people diagnosed with depressive disorders: a qualitative study in primary care and specialist mental health settings. BMC Psychiatry 2011;11:194.
25. Clever SL, Ford DE, Rubenstein LV, et al. Primary care patients' involvement in decision-making is associated with improvement in depression. Med Care 2006;44:398-405.
26. Stacey D, Légaré F, Col NF, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;1:CD001431.
27. Wyatt KD, Branda ME, Inselman JW, et al. Genders of patients and clinicians and their effect on shared decision making: a participant-level meta-analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2014;14:81.
28. Duncan E, Best C, Hagen S. Shared decision making interventions for people with mental health conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (1): CD007297.
29. LeBlanc A, Herrin J, Williams MD, et al. Shared decision making for antidepressants in primary care: a cluster randomized trial. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:1761-70.
30. Loh A, Simon D, Wills CE, et al. The effects of a shared decisionmaking intervention in primary care of depression: a clusterrandomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2007;67:324-32.
31. Hasin DS, Goodwin RD, Stinson FS, et al. Epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcoholism and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62:1097-106.
32. Donnelly KZ, Foster TC, Thompson R. What matters most? The content and concordance of patients' and providers' information priorities for contraceptive decision making. Contraception 2014;90:280-7.
33. Ryan C. Language use in the United States:2011. US Census Bureau, 2013.
34. About Educational Attainment-US Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/hhes/socdemo/education/about/ (accessed 30 Oct. 2015).
35. Humes KR, Jones NA, Ramirez RR. Overview of race and Hispanic origin:2010. US Census Bureau, 2011.
36. Kreider RM, Simmons T. Marital status:2000. US Census Bureau, 2003.
37. Elwyn G, Barr PJ, Grande SW, et al. Developing CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2013;93:102-7.
38. Barr PJ, Thompson R, Walsh T, et al. The psychometric properties of CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of the shared decision-making process. J Med Internet Res 2014;16:e2.
39. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:1373-9.
40. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Selected patient and provider characteristics for ambulatory care visits to physician offices and hospital outpatient and emergency departments: United States, 2009-2010. FastStats. 2010. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/combined-tables/AMC-2009-2010-combined-web-table01.pdf (accessed 9 Jun. 2015).
41. Dunlea R, Lenert L. Understanding patients' preferences for referrals to specialists for an asymptomatic condition. Med Decis Making 2015;35:691-702.
42. Tseng C-W, Waitzfelder BE, Tierney EF, et al. Patients' willingness to discuss trade-offs to lower their out-of-pocket drug costs. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1502-4.
43. Alexander GC, Casalino LP, Meltzer DO. Patient-physician communication about out-of-pocket costs. JAMA 2003;290:953-8.
44. Alexander GC, Casalino LP, Tseng C-W, et al. Barriers to patient-physician communication about out-of-pocket costs. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:856-60.
45. Blumenthal-Barby JS, Robinson E, Cantor SB, et al. The neglected topic: presentation of cost information in patient decision AIDS. Med Decis Making 2015;35:412-18.
46. Ubel PA, Abernethy AP, Zafar SY. Full disclosure-out-of-pocket costs as side effects. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1484-6.
47. Barr PJ, Thompson R, Forcino RC, et al. Implementing CollaboRATE in primary care: an interim analysis. International Shared Decision Making Conference; 2015.
48. Thompson R, Nye A, Walker E, et al. From bariatric surgery to vasectomy: how much shared decision making takes place in routine health care? International Shared Decision Making Conference; 2015.
49. Arora NK, McHorney CA. Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate? Med Care 2000;38:335-41.
50. Tai-Seale M, Foo PK, Stults CD. Patients with mental health needs are engaged in asking questions, but physicians' responses vary. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32:259-67.
51. Dwight-Johnson M, Unutzer J, Sherbourne C, et al. Can quality improvement programs for depression in primary care address patient preferences for treatment? Med Care 2001;39:934-44.