Identifying research priorities in anaesthesia and perioperative care: Final report of the joint National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia/James Lind Alliance Research Priority Setting Partnership

BMJ Open

Volumn 5, Issue 12, 2015, Pages

  Boney, Oliver ^a,b   Bell, Madeline ^c   Bell, Natalie ^c   Conquest, Ann ^d   Cumbers, Marion ^e   Drake, Sharon ^c   Galsworthy, Mike ^b,c   Gath, Jacqui ^f   Grocott, Michael P W ^a,b,g,h   Harris, Emma ⁱ   Howell, Simon ^c   Ingold, Anthony ^j   Nathanson, Michael H ^k   Pinkney, Thomas ^l   Metcalf, Leanne ^m  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL COLLEGE OF ANAESTHETISTS   (United Kingdom)

^d Association for Perioperative Practice   (United Kingdom)

^e ROYAL NATIONAL ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f Independent Cancer Patients' Voice   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^j Oesophageal Patients' Association   (United Kingdom)

^k Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI)   (United Kingdom)

^l Royal College   (United Kingdom)

^m James Lind Alliance   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; CHRONIC PAIN; CONSENSUS; EMERGENCY SURGERY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; RESEARCH PRIORITY; WORKSHOP; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; PUBLIC RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED KINGDOM;

ANESTHESIA; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84960124533     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010006     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Peckham M. Research and development for the National Health Service. Lancet 1991;338:367-71.
2. Stewart RJ, Caird J, Oliver K, et al. Patients' and clinicians' research priorities. Health Expect 2011;14:439-48.
3. Tallon D, Chard J, Dieppe P. Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer. Lancet 2000;355:2037-40.
4. Froggatt K, Preston N, Turner M, et al. Patient and public involvement in research and the Cancer Experiences Collaborative: benefits and challenges. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2014
5. Thompson J, Bissell P, Cooper CL, et al. Exploring the impact of patient and public involvement in a cancer research setting. Qual Health Res 2014;24:46-54.
6. Mockford C, Staniszewska S, Griffiths F, et al. The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: A systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care 2012;24:28-38.
7. Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, et al. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient 2014;7:387-95.
8. Jones EL, Williams-Yesson BA, Hackett RC, et al. Quality of reporting on patient and public involvement within surgical research: A systematic review. Ann Surg 2015;261:243-50.
9. Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, et al. The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011;27:391-9.
10. JLA. The James Lind Alliance. Secondary The James Lind Alliance, 2014.
11. Howell SJ, Pandit JJ, Rowbotham DJ, et al. National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia research priority setting exercise. Br J Anaesth 2012;108:42-52.
12. Cowan K, Oliver S. The James Lind Alliance Guidebook. Secondary The James Lind Alliance Guidebook, 2010.
13. INVOLVE. Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Secondary Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. 2011.
14. Reay H, Arulkumaran N, Brett SJ. Priorities for Future Intensive Care Research in the UK: results of a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership. J Intensive Care Soc 2014;15:288-96.
15. NICE. UK Database of Uncertainties about the Effects of Treatments (DUETs). Secondary UK Database of Uncertainties about the Effects of Treatments (DUETs).
16. lindalliance.org. How the James Lind Alliance works. Secondary How the James Lind Alliance works 2015.
17. Gargon E, Gurung B, Medley N, et al. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e99111.