National Institute of Academic anaesthesia research priority setting exercise

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 108, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 42-52

  Howell, S J ^a   Pandit, J J ^b   Rowbotham, D J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

anaesthesia; perioperative medicine; research priority setting

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ACADEMIC ANESTHESIA; ORGANIZATION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RESEARCH PRIORITY; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 84055197909     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer418     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Pandit JJ. A National Strategy for Academic Anaesthesia. London: Royal College of Anaesthetists, 2005
2. Rowbotham DJ. National Institute for Academic Anaesthesia. Bull Roy Coll Anaesthet 2008; 48: 2516-7
3. Oliver S, Clarke-Jones L, Rees R, et al. Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: Developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technol Assess 2004; 8: 1-148, III-IV
4. Peckham M. Research and development for the National Health Service. Lancet 1991; 338: 367-71
5. Research for Health: Department of Health 1993
6. Elwyn G, Crowe S, Fenton M, et al. Identifying and prioritizing uncertainties: Patient and clinician engagement in the identification of research questions. J Eval Clin Pract 2010; 16: 627-31
7. Buckley BS, Grant AM, Tincello DG, Wagg AS, Firkins L. Prioritizing research: Patients, carers, and clinicians working together to identify and prioritize important clinical uncertainties in urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2010; 29: 708-14
8. Brown P, Brunnhuber K, Chalkidou K, et al. How to formulate research recommendations. Br Med J 2006; 333: 804-6 (Pubitemid 44583363)
9. Cook TM, Counsell D, Wildsmith JA. Major complications of central neuraxial block: Report on the Third National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 179-90
10. Oliver S, Milne R, Bardburn J, Buchanan P, Kerridge L, Walley T. Investigating consumer perspectives on evaluating health technologies. Evaluation 2001; 7: 468-86
11. Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. Br Med J 1995; 311: 376-80
12. Owens C, Ley A, Aitken P. Do different stakeholder groups share mental health research priorities?. A four-arm Delphi study. Health Expect 2008; 11: 418-31
13. Johanson R, Rigby C, Newburn M, Stewart M, Jones P. Suggestions in maternal and child health for the National TechnologyAssessment Programme: A consideration of consumer and professional priorities. J Roy Soc Promot Health 2002; 122: 50-4
14. Caron-Flinterman JF, Broerse JE, Teerling J, Bunders JF. Patients' priorities concerning health research: The case of asthma and COPD research in the Netherlands. Health Expect 2005; 8: 253-63 (Pubitemid 41153095)
15. Wright D, Corner J, Hopkinson J, Foster C. Listening to the views of people affected by cancer about cancer research: An example of participatory research in setting the cancer research agenda. Health Expect 2006; 9: 3-12
16. Rudan I, El Arifeen S, Black RE. A New Approach for Systematic Priority Setting in Child Health Research Investment. Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative, 2006
17. James Lind Alliance Guidebook, 2010. Available from http://www jlaguidebook.org/
18. Tomlinson M, Rudan I, Saxena S, Swartz L, Tsai AC, Patel V. Setting priorities for global mental health research. Bull World Health Organisation 2009; 87: 438-46
19. Pandit JJ. Future opportunities and challenges in academic anesthesia in the United Kingdom: A model for maintaining the scientific edge. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2010; 23: 159-66
20. Pandit JJ. Royal College recommendations to improve academic anesthesia in the United Kingdom: How they compare with United States proposals. Anesthesiology 2006; 105: 635-6