Spectrum of Cytogenomic Abnormalities Revealed by Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization on Products of Conception Culture Failure and Normal Karyotype Samples

Journal of Genetics and Genomics

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 121-131

  Zhou, Qinghua ^a,b   Wu, Shen Yin ^b   Amato, Katherine ^b   DiAdamo, Autumn ^b   Li, Peining ^b  

^a JINAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Apoptosis; Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH); Chromosomal and genomic abnormalities; Culture failure; Normal karyotype; Products of conception (POC)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONCEPTION; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; FEMALE; FETUS; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE FREQUENCY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; KARYOTYPE; KARYOTYPING; SALVAGE THERAPY; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; TRISOMY; ADOLESCENT; FERTILIZATION; GENE DOSAGE; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; MALE; PREGNANCY; YOUNG ADULT;

ABORTION, SPONTANEOUS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; GENE DOSAGE; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; HUMANS; KARYOTYPE; MALE; PREGNANCY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84959918392     PISSN: 16738527     EISSN: 18735533     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2016.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ayme S., Lippman-Hand A. Maternal-age effect in aneuploidy: does altered embryonic selection play a role?. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1982, 34:558-565.
2. Benkhalifa M., Kasakyan S., Clement P., Baldi M., Tachdjian G., Demirol A., Gurgan T., Fiorentino F., Mohammed M., Qumsiyeh M.B. Array comparative genomic hybridization profiling of first-trimester spontaneous abortions that fail to grow in vitro. Prenat. Diagn. 2005, 25:894-900.
3. Bug S., Solfrank B., Schmitz F., Pricelius J., Stecher M., Craig A., Botcherby M., Nevinny-Stickel-Hinzpeter C. Diagnostic utility of novel combined arrays for genome-wide simultaneous detection of aneuploidy and uniparental isodisomy in losses of pregnancy. Mol. Cytogenet. 2014, 7:43.
4. Dória S., Carvalho F., Ramalho C., Lima V., Francisco T., Machado A.P., Brandão O., Sousa M., Matias A., Barros A. An efficient protocol for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities in spontaneous miscarriages or foetal deaths. Eu. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2009, 147:144-150.
5. Evangelidou P., Sismani C., Ioannides M., Christodoulou C., Koumbaris G., Kallikas I., Georgiou I., Velissariou V., Patsalis P.C. Clinical application of whole-genome array CGH during prenatal diagnosis: study of 25 selected pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings or apparently balanced structural aberrations. Mol. Cytogenet. 2010, 3:24.
6. Fritz B., Hallermann C., Olert J., Fuchs B., Bruns M., Aslan M., Schmidt S., Coerdt W., Müntefering H., Rehder H. Cytogenetic analyses of culture failures by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)-re-evaluation of chromosome aberration rates in early spontaneous abortions. Eu. J. Hum. Genet. 2001, 9:539-547.
7. Gao J., Liu C., Yao F., Hao N., Zhou J., Zhou Q., Zhang L., Liu X., Bian X., Liu J. Array- based comparative genomic hybridization is more informative than conventional karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization in the analysis of first-trimester spontaneous abortion. Mol. Cytogenet. 2012, 5:33.
8. Gardo S. Spontaneous abortion and genetic natural selection. Orv. Hetil. 1993, 134:1459-1464.
9. Herbert M., Kalleas D., Cooney D., Lamb M., Lister L. Meiosis and maternal aging: insights from aneuploid oocytes and trisomy births. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015, 7:a017970.
10. Hook E.B. Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1977, 29:94-97.
11. Kooper A.J., Faas B.H., Feenstra I., de Leeuw N., Smeets D.F. Best diagnostic approach for the genetic evaluation of fetuses after intrauterine death in first, second or third trimester: QF-PCR, karyotyping and/or genome wide SNP array analysis. Mol. Cytogenet. 2014, 7:6.
12. Kudesia R., Li M., Smith J., Patel A., Williams Z. Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array- based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2014, 12:19.
13. Lebedev I.N., Ostroverkhova N.V., Nikitina T.V., Sukhanova N.N., Nazarenko S.A. Features of chromosomal abnormalities in spontaneous abortion cell culture failure detected by interphase FISH analysis. Eu. J. Hum. Genet. 2004, 12:513-520.
14. Li P., Pomianowski P., DiMaio S.M., Stanis J.R., Rossi M.R., Xiang B., Xu F., Yang H., Geng Q., Xie J.S., Mahoney M.J. Genomic characterization of prenatally detected chromosomal structural abnormalities using oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2011, 155A:1605-1615.
15. Manning M., Hudgins L. Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities. Genet. Med. 2010, 12:742-745. Professional Practice and Guidelines Committee.
16. MacLennan M., Crichton J.H., Playfoot C.J., Adams I.R. Oocyte development, meiosis and aneuploidy. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2015, 45:68-76.
17. Menasha J., Levy B., Hirschhorn K., Kardon N.B. Incidence and spectrum of chromosome abnormalities in spontaneous abortions: new insights from a 12-year study. Genet. Med. 2005, 7:251-263.
18. Meng J.-L., Matarese C., Crivello J., Wilcox K., Wang D.-M., DiAdamo A.J., Xu F., Li P. Changes in and efficacies of indications for invasive prenatal diagnosis of cytogenomic abnormalities: 13 years of experience in a single center. Med. Sci. Monit. 2015, 21:1942-1948.
19. Menten B., Swerts K., Delle Chiaie B., Janssens S., Buysse K., Philippé J., Speleman F. Array comparative genomic hybridization and flow cytometry analysis of spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples. BMC Med. Genet. 2009, 10:89.
20. Miller D.T., Adam M.P., Aradhya S., Biesecker L.G., Brothman A.R., Carter N.P., Church D.M., Crolla J.A., Eichler E.E., Epstein C.J., Faucett W.A., Feuk L., Friedman J.M., Hamosh A., Jackson L., Kaminsky E.B., Kok K., Krantz I.D., Kuhn R.M., Lee C., Ostell J.M., Rosenberg C., Scherer S.W., Spinner N.B., Stavropoulos D.J., Tepperberg J.H., Thorland E.C., Vermeesch J.R., Waggoner D.J., Watson M.S., Martin C.L., Ledbetter D.H. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2010, 86:749-764.
21. Nussbaum R.L., McInnes R.R., Willard H.F., Hamosh A. Thompson & Thompson Genetics in Medicine 2007, Saunders Elsevier Publishers, Philadelphia, PA. seventh ed.
22. Qumsiyeh M.B., Kim K.-R., Ahmed M.N., Bradford W. Cytogenetics and mechanisms of spontaneous abortions: increased apoptosis and decreased cell proliferation in chromosomally abnormal villi. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 2000, 88:230-235.
23. Reddy U.M., Page G.P., Saade G.R., Silver R.M., Thorsten V.R., Parker C.B., Pinar H., Willinger M., Stoll B.J., Heim-Hall J., Varner M.W., Goldenberg R.L., Bukowski R., Wapner R.J., Drews-Botsch C.D., O'Brien B.M., Dudley D.J., Levy B. Karyotype versus microarray testing for genetic abnormalities after stillbirth. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367:2185-2193. for NICHD Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network.
24. Risch N., Stein Z., Kline J., Warburton D. The relationship between maternal age and chromosome size in autosomal trisomy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1986, 39:68-78.
25. Robberecht C., Schuddinck V., Fryns J.P., Vermeesch J.R. Diagnosis of miscarriages by molecular karyotyping: benefits and pitfalls. Genet. Med. 2009, 9:646-654.
26. Robberecht C., Pexsters A., Deprest J., Fryns J.P., D'Hooghe T., Vermeesch J.R. Cytogenetic and morphological analysis of early products of conception following hystero-embryoscopy from couples with recurrent pregnancy loss. Prenat. Diagn. 2012, 32:933-942.
27. Sankaranarayanan K. The role of non-disjunction in aneuploidy in man an overview. Mutat. Res. 1979, 61:1-28.
28. Sauer M.V. Infertility and early pregnancy loss is largely due to oocyte aging, not uterine senescence, as demonstrated by oocyte donation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 828:166-174.
29. Schaeffer A.J., Chung J., Heretis K., Wong A., Ledbetter D.H., Lese Martin C. Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2004, 74:1168-1174.
30. Shimokawa O., Harada N., Miyake N., Satoh K., Mizuguchi T., Niikawa N., Matsumoto N. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis in first-trimester spontaneous abortions with 'normal' karyotypes. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2006, 140A:1931-1935.
31. van den Berg M.M., van Maarle M.C., van Wely M., Goddijn M. Genetics of early miscarriage. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2012, 1822:1951-1959.
32. Viaggi C.D., Cavani S., Malacarne M., Floriddia F., Zerega G., Baldo C., Mogni M., Castagnetta M., Piombo G., Coviello D.A., Camandona F., Lijoi D., Insegno W., Traversa M., Pierluigi M. First-trimester euploid miscarriages analysed by array-CGH. J. Appl. Genet. 2013, 3:353-359.
33. Wang B.T., Chong T.P., Boyar F.Z., Kopita K.A., Ross L.P., El-Naggar M.M., Sahoo T., Wang J.C., Hemmat M., Haddadin M.H., Owen R., Anguiano A.L. Abnormalities in spontaneous abortions detected by G-banding and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) at a national reference laboratory. Mol. Cytogenet. 2014, 7:33.
34. Wapner R.J., Martin C.L., Levy B., Ballif B.C., Eng C.M., Zachary J.M., Savage M., Platt L.D., Saltzman D., Grobman W.A., Klugman S., Scholl T., Simpson J.L., McCall K., Aggarwal V.S., Bunke B., Nahum O., Patel A., Lamb A.N., Thom E.A., Beaudet A.L., Ledbetter D.H., Shaffer L.G., Jackson L. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367:2175-2184.
35. Warburton D. Biological aging and the etiology of aneuploidy. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2005, 111:266-272.
36. Warren J.E., Turok D.K., Maxwell T.M., Brothman A.R., Silver R.M. Array comparative genomic hybridization for genetic evaluation of fetal loss between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009, 114:1093-1102.
37. Wei Y., Xu F., Li P. Technology-driven and evidence-based genomic analysis for integrated pediatric and prenatal genetic evaluation. J. Genet. Genomics 2013, 40:1-14.
38. Wilcox A., Weinberg C., O'Connor J., Baird D., Schlatterer J., Canfield R., Armstrong E., Nisula B. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N. Engl. J. Med. 1988, 319:189-194.
39. Xiang B., Hemingway S., Qumsiyeh M., Li P. CytoAccess: a relational laboratory information management system for a clinical cytogenetics laboratory. J. Assoc. Genet. Technol. 2006, 32:168-170.
40. Xiang B., Li A., Valentin D., Novak N., Zhao H.Y., Li P. Analytical and clinical validity of whole genome oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization for pediatric patients with mental retardation and developmental delay. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2008, 146A:1942-1954.
41. Xiang B., Zhu H., Shen Y., Miller D.T., Lu K., Hu X., Andersson H.C., Narumanchi T.M., Wang Y., Martinez J.E., Wu B.-L., Li P., Li M.M., Chen T.-J., Fan Y.-S. Genome-wide oligonucleotide array CGH for etiological diagnosis of mental retardation: a multi-center experience of 1,499 clinical cases. J. Mol. Diagn. 2010, 12:204-212.
42. Xu F., Li L., Schulz V.P., Gallager P.G., Xiang B., Zhao H.Y., Li P. Cytogenomic mapping and bioinformatic mining reveal interacting brain expressed genes for intellectural disabilities. Mol. Cytogenet. 2014, 7:4.
43. Xu Z.Y., Geng Q., Luo F.W., Xu F., Li P., Xie J.S. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and array comparative genomic hybridization analyses for prenatal diagnosis of cytogenomic abnormalities. Mol. Cytogenet. 2014, 7:84.
44. Zhang Y.X., Zhang Y.P., Gu Y., Guan F.J., Li S.L., Xie J.S., Shen Y., Wu B.L., Ju W., Jenkins E.C., Brown W.T., Zhong N. Genetic analysis of first trismester miscarriage with a combination of cytogenetic karyotyping, miscrosatellite genotyping and array CGH. Clin. Genet. 2009, 75:133-140.