Array-based comparative genomic hybridization is more informative than conventional karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization in the analysis of first-trimester spontaneous abortion

Molecular Cytogenetics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Gao, Jinsong ^a   Liu, Congcong ^a   Yao, Fengxia ^a   Hao, Na ^a   Zhou, Jing ^a   Zhou, Qian ^a   Zhang, Liang ^b   Liu, Xinyan ^a   Bian, Xuming ^a   Liu, Juntao ^a  

^a PEKING UNION MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (China)

^b BioChain Beijing Science and Technology Inc   (China)

Author keywords

Aneuploidy; Array based comparative genomic hybridization; Karyotyping; Spontaneous abortion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; ARRAY BASED COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; FEMALE; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; KARYOTYPE; KARYOTYPING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOSAICISM; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; TRIPLOIDY;

EID: 84868372148     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17558166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1755-8166-5-33     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Estimates of human fertility and pregnancy loss. Zinaman MJ, Clegg ED, Brown CC, O'Connor J, Selevan SG, Fertil Steril 1996 65 503 509 8774277 (Pubitemid 26069103)
2. Genetic factors in recurrent abortion. Byrne JL, Ward K, Clin Obstet Gynecol 1994 37 693 704 10.1097/00003081-199409000-00021 7955654 (Pubitemid 24323546)
3. Chromosome abnormalities identified in 347 spontaneous abortions collected in Japan. Nagaishi MYT, Iinuma K, Shimomura K, Berend SA, Knops J, J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2004 30 237 241 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2004.00191.x 15210050 (Pubitemid 38855830)
4. Cytogenetic studies in spontaneous abortion: the Calgary experience. Lin CC, De Braekeleer M, Jamro H, Can J Genet Cytol 1985 27 565 570 4063875 (Pubitemid 16208820)
5. Collection of villous tissue under ultrasound guidance to improve the cytogenetic study of early pregnancy failure. Greenwold N, Jauniaux E, Hum Reprod 2002 17 452 456 10.1093/humrep/17.2.452 11821294 (Pubitemid 34168457)
6. Cytogenetics of spontaneous abortions and later pregnancy loss. Gardner MR, Sutherland GR, Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling New York: Oxford University Press, Gardner MR, Sutherland GR, 3 2004 343 345
7. Array comparative genomic hybridization profiling of first-trimester spontaneous abortions that fail to growin vitro. Benkhalifa M, Kasakyan S, Clement P, Baldi M, Tachdjian G, Demirol A, Gurgan T, Fiorentino F, Mohammed M, Qumsiyeh MB, Prenat Diagn 2005 25 894 900 10.1002/pd.1230 16088865 (Pubitemid 41494984)
8. Prenatal detection of chromosome aneuploidies by fluorescence in situ hybridization: experience with 2000 uncultured amniotic fluid samples in a prospective preclinical trial. Bryndorf T, Christensen B, Vad M, Parner J, Brocks V, Philip J, Prenat Diagn 1997 17 333 341 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199704) 17:4<333::AID-PD76>3.0.CO;2-# 9160386 (Pubitemid 27192958)
9. Prenatal detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured chorionic villus samples by FISH. Bryndorf T, Christensen B, Vad M, Parner J, Carelli MP, Ward BE, Klinger KW, Bang J, Philip J, Am J Hum Genet 1996 59 918 926 8808609 (Pubitemid 26328090)
10. High-throughput analysis of chromosome abnormality in spontaneous miscarriage using an MLPA subtelomere assay with an ancillary FISH test for polyploidy. Bruno DL, Burgess T, Ren H, Nouri S, Pertile MD, Francis DI, Norris F, Kenney BK, Schouten J, Andy Choo KH, et al. Am J Med Genet A 2006 140 2786 2793 17106871 (Pubitemid 44865065)
11. Application of quantitative fluorescent PCR with short tandem repeat markers to the study of aneuploidies in spontaneous miscarriages. Diego-Alvarez D, Garcia-Hoyos M, Trujillo MJ, Gonzalez-Gonzalez C, Rodriguez de Alba M, Ayuso C, Ramos-Corrales C, Lorda-Sanchez I, Hum Reprod 2005 20 1235 1243 10.1093/humrep/deh781 15760965 (Pubitemid 40790246)
12. Multiplex interphase FISH as a screen for common aneuploidies in spontaneous abortions. Jobanputra V, Sobrino A, Kinney A, Kline J, Warburton D, Hum Reprod 2002 17 1166 1170 10.1093/humrep/17.5.1166 11980734 (Pubitemid 34537345)
13. Will the new cytogenetics replace the old cytogenetics? Salman M, Jhanwar SC, Ostrer H, Clin Genet 2004 66 265 275 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00316.x 15355426 (Pubitemid 39317629)
14. Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hillman SC, Pretlove S, Coomarasamy A, McMullan DJ, Davison EV, Maher ER, Kilby MD, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011 37 6 14 10.1002/uog.7754 20658510
15. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, Clark S, Poole I, Kowbel D, Collins C, Kuo WL, Chen C, Zhai Y, et al. Nat Genet 1998 20 207 211 10.1038/2524 9771718 (Pubitemid 28455458)
16. Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number. Snijders AM, Nowak N, Segraves R, Blackwood S, Brown N, Conroy J, Hamilton G, Hindle AK, Huey B, Kimura K, et al. Nat Genet 2001 29 263 264 10.1038/ng754 11687795 (Pubitemid 33096449)
17. Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies. Lee CN, Lin SY, Lin CH, Shih JC, Lin TH, Su YN, BJOG 2012 119 614 625 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03279.x 22313859
18. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, Biesecker LG, Brothman AR, Carter NP, Church DM, Crolla JA, Eichler EE, Epstein CJ, et al. Am J Hum Genet 2010 86 749 764 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006 20466091
19. Array-CGH testing in spontaneous abortions with normal karyotypes. Borovik CL PA, da Silva L, Krepischi-Santos A, Costa S, Rosenberg C, Genet Mol Bio 2008 31 416 422 10.1590/S1415-47572008000300004 (Pubitemid 351935962)
20. Array comparative genomic hybridization and flow cytometry analysis of spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples. Menten B, Swerts K, Chiaie B, Janssens S, Buysse K, Philippé J, Speleman F, BMC Med Genet 2009 10 89 93 19751515
21. Diagnosis of miscarriages by molecular karyotyping: benefits and pitfalls. Robberecht C, Schuddinck V, Fryns JP, Vermeesch JR, Genet Med 2009 11 646 654 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181abc92a 19617844
22. Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages. Schaeffer AJ, Chung J, Heretis K, Wong A, Ledbetter DH, Lese Martin C, Am J Hum Genet 2004 74 1168 1174 10.1086/421250 15127362 (Pubitemid 38669315)
23. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis in first-trimester spontaneous abortions with normal karyotypes. Shimokawa O, Harada N, Miyake N, Satoh K, Mizuguchi T, Niikawa N, Matsumoto N, Am J Med Genet A 2006 140 1931 1935 16906550 (Pubitemid 44380081)
24. Genetic analysis of first-trimester miscarriages with a combination of cytogenetic karyotyping, microsatellite genotyping and arrayCGH. Zhang YX, Zhang YP, Gu Y, Guan FJ, Li SL, Xie JS, Shen Y, Wu BL, Ju W, Jenkins EC, et al. Clin Genet 2009 75 133 140 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01131.x 19215247
25. Identification of copy number variants in miscarriages from couples with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss. Rajcan-Separovic E, Diego-Alvarez D, Robinson WP, Tyson C, Qiao Y, Harvard C, Fawcett C, Kalousek D, Philipp T, Somerville MJ, et al. Hum Reprod 2010 25 2913 2922 10.1093/humrep/deq202 20847186
26. Genomic changes detected by array CGH in human embryos with developmental defects. Rajcan-Separovic E, Qiao Y, Tyson C, Harvard C, Fawcett C, Kalousek D, Stephenson M, Philipp T, Mol Hum Reprod 2010 16 125 134 10.1093/molehr/gap083 19778950
27. Genome-wide oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization for etiological diagnosis of mental retardation: a multicenter experience of 1499 clinical cases. Xiang B, Zhu H, Shen Y, Miller DT, Lu K, Hu X, Andersson HC, Narumanchi TM, Wang Y, Martinez JE, et al. J Mol Diagn 2010 12 204 212 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090115 20093387
28. Comparative genomic hybridization in combination with flow cytometry improves results of cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions. Lomax B, Tang S, Separovic E, Phillips D, Hillard E, Thomson T, Kalousek DK, Am J Hum Genet 2000 66 1516 1521 10.1086/302878 10741955 (Pubitemid 30463070)
29. Detecting sex chromosome anomalies and common triploidies in products of conception by array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Ballif BC, Kashork CD, Saleki R, Rorem E, Sundin K, Bejjani BA, Shaffer LG, Prenat Diagn 2006 26 333 339 10.1002/pd.1411 16491513
30. Rapid Prenatal Diagnostics in the Interphase Nucleus: Procedure and Cut-off Rates. Liehr T, J Histochem Cytochem 2005 53 289 291 10.1369/jhc.4B6394.2005 15750004 (Pubitemid 40344059)
31. Preprocessing and downstream analysis of microarray DNA copy number profiles. van de Wiel MA, Picard F, van Wieringen WN, Ylstra B, Brief Bioinform 2011 12 10 21 10.1093/bib/bbq004 20172948
32. Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays. Pollack JR, Perou CM, Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Pergamenschikov A, Williams CF, Jeffrey SS, Botstein D, Brown PO, Nat Genet 1999 23 41 46 10471496 (Pubitemid 29418785)
33. Rapid and simple prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome disorders: advantages and disadvantages of the molecular methods FISH and QF-PCR. Hulten MA, Dhanjal S, Pertl B, Reproduction 2003 126 279 297 10.1530/rep.0.1260279 12968936 (Pubitemid 37185228)