Array comparative genomic hybridization profiling of first-trimester spontaneous abortions that fail to grow in vitro

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 25, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 894-900

  Benkhalifa, M ^a,c   Kasakyan, S ^a   Clement, P ^b   Baldi, M ^c   Tachdjian, G ^d   Demirol, A ^e   Gurgan, T ^e   Florentino, F ^c   Mohammed, M ^f   Qumsiyeh, M B ^g,h  

^a ATL R and D   (France)

^b Laboratoire Clément   (France)

^c Consultorio di Genetica and Genoma Laboratories ^*  (Italy)

^d HÔPITAL ANTOINE BÉCLÈRE   (France)

^e Infertility and IVF Center   (Turkey)

^f QUEST DIAGNOSTICS NICHOLS INSTITUTE   (United States)

^g YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h siParadigm   (United States)

Author keywords

Array CGH; Autosomal monosomy; Cell culture failure; Chromosome abnormalities; First trimester fetal loss

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL GROWTH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOGENETICS; DNA MICROARRAY; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS WASTAGE; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; KARYOTYPE; MALE; MONOSOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION;

ABORTION, SPONTANEOUS; ANEUPLOIDY; CELL DIVISION; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 21; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, X; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; KARYOTYPING; MONOSOMY; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES;

EID: 27144547761     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.1230     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bell KA, Van Deerlin PG, Feinberg RF, du Manoir S, Haddad BR. 2001. Diagnosis of aneuploidy in archival, paraffin-embedded pregnancy-loss tissues by comparative genomic hybridization. Fertil Steril 75: 374-379.
2. Benkhalifa M, Kahraman S, Caserta D, Donmez E, Qumsiyeh MB. 2003. Morphological and cytogenetic analysis of intact oocytes and blocked zygotes. Prenat Diagn 23: 397-404.
3. Benkhalifa M, Kahraman S, Biricik MDA, et al. 2004. Cytogenetic abnormalities and the failure of development after round spermatid injections. Fertil Steril 8: 1283-1288.
4. Bruder CE, Hirvela C, Tapia-Paez I, et al. 2001. High resolution deletion analysis of constitutional DNA from neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients using microarray-CGH. Hum Mol Genet 10: 271-282.
5. Daniely M, Aviram-Goldring A, Barkai G, Goldman B. 1998. Detection of chromosomal aberration in fetuses arising from recurrent spontaneous abortion by comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod 13: 805-809.
6. Fritz B, Hallermann C, Olert J, et al. 2001. Cytogenetic analyses of culture failures by comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH): reevaluation of chromosome aberration rates in early spontaneous abortions. Eur J Hum Genet 9: 539-547.
7. Gardner RJM, Sutherland GR. 2003. Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling. Oxford Monographs on Medical Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Handyside AH, Robinson MD, Simpson RJ, et al. 2004. Isothermal whole genome amplification from single and small numbers of cells: a new era for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of inherited disease. Mol Hum Reprod 10: 767-772.
9. Hellani A, Coskun S, Benkhalifa M, et al. 2004. Multiple displacement amplification on single cell and possible PGD applications. Mol Hum Reprod 10: 847-852.
10. Kahraman S, Benkhalifa M, Donmez E, et al. 2004. The results of aneuploidy screening in 276 couples undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Prenat Diagn 24: 307-311.
11. Lebedev IN, Ostroverkhova NV, Nikitina TV, Sukhanova NN, Nazarenko SA. 2003. Molecular cytogenetic characteristics of chromosome imbalance in cells of spontaneous human abortion fetuses with low proliferative activity in vitro. Genetika 39: 1111-1122.
12. Lomax B, Tang S, Separovic E, et al. 2000. Comparative genomic hybridization in combination with flow cytometry improves results of cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions. Am J Hum Genet 66: 1516-1521.
13. Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, et al. 1998. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet 20: 207-211.
14. Qumsiyeh MB. 1998. Chromosome abnormalities in the placenta and spontaneous abortions. J Matern Fetal Med 7: 210-212.
15. Qumsiyeh MB, Kim KR, Bradford W. 2000. Cytogenetics and mechanisms of spontaneous abortions: increased apoptosis and decreased cellular proliferation in chromosomally abnormal villi. Cytogenet Cell Genet 88: 230-235.
16. Reddy KS. 1997. Double trisomy in spontaneous abortions. Hum Genet 101: 339-345.
17. Schaeffer AJ, Chung J, Heretis K, Wong A, Ledbetter DH, Martin CL. 2004. Comparative genomic hybridization array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages. Am J Hum Genet 74: 1168-1174.
18. Shaw-Smith C, Redon R, Rickman L, et al. 2004. Microarray based comparative genomic hybridisation (array-CGH) detects submicroscopic chromosomal deletions and duplications in patients with learning disability/mental retardation and dysmorphic features. J Med Genet 41: 241-248.
19. Solinas-Toldo S, Lampel S, Stilgenbauer S, et al. 1997. Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 20: 399-407.
20. Tabet AC, Aboura A, Dauge MC, et al. 2001. Cytogenetic analysis of trophoblasts by comparative genomic hybridization in embryo-fetal development anomalies. Prenat Diagn 21: 613-618.
21. Tan YQ, Hu L, Lin G, et al. 2004. Genetic changes in human fetuses from spontaneous abortion after in vitro fertilization detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Biol Reprod 70: 495-499.
22. Warburton D, Susser M, Stein Z, Kline J. 1979. Genetic and epidemiologic investigation of spontaneous abortion: relevance to clinical practice. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 15: 127-136.