Improved transition-based parsing and tagging with neural networks

Conference Proceedings - EMNLP 2015: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 1354-1359

  Alberti, Chris ^a   Weiss, David ^a   Coppola, Greg ^a   Petrov, Slav ^a  

^a GOOGLE INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PETROLEUM RESERVOIR EVALUATION;

DEPENDENCY PARSING; MORPHOLOGICAL PROPERTIES; NETWORK TRANSITION; NEURAL NETWORK METHOD; PART OF SPEECH; PART OF SPEECH TAGGING; SET-VALUED; TRANSITION SYSTEM;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84959905151     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.18653/v1/d15-1159     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Bernd Bohnet and Jonas Kuhn. 2012. The best of both worlds: a graph-based completion model for transition-based parsers. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 77-87.
2. Bernd Bohnet and Joakim Nivre. 2012. A transitionbased system for joint part-of-speech tagging and labeled non-projective dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 1455-1465.
3. Bernd Bohnet, Joakim Nivre, Igor Boguslavsky, Richárd Farkas, Filip Ginter, and Jan Hajič. 2013. Joint morphological and syntactic analysis for richly inflected languages. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1:415-428.
4. Bernd Bohnet. 2009. Efficient parsing of syntactic and semantic dependency structures. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task, pages 67-72.
5. Bernd Bohnet. 2010. Top accuracy and fast dependency parsing is not a contradiction. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2010), pages 89-97.
6. Wanxiang Che, Zhenghua Li, Yongqiang Li, Yuhang Guo, Bing Qin, and Ting Liu. 2009. Multilingual dependency-based syntactic and semantic parsing. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task, pages 49-54.
7. Danqi Chen and Christopher D. Manning. 2014. A fast and accurate dependency parser using neural networks. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 740-750.
8. Marie-Catherine De Marneffe, Bill MacCartney, and Christopher D. Manning. 2006. Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 449-454.
9. Chris Dyer, Miguel Ballesteros, Wang Ling, Austin Matthews, and Noah A. Smith. 2015. Transitionbased dependency parsing with stack long shortterm memory. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 334-343.
10. Andrea Gesmundo, James Henderson, Paola Merlo, and Ivan Titov. 2009. A latent variable model of synchronous syntactic-semantic parsing for multiple languages. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task, pages 37-42.
11. Jan Hajič, Massimiliano Ciaramita, Richard Johansson, Daisuke Kawahara, Maria Antònia Martí, Lluís Màrquez, Adam Meyers, Joakim Nivre, Sebastian Padó, Jan Štepánek, Pavel Straňak, Mihai Surdeanu, Nianwen Xue, and Yi Zhang. 2009. The conll-2009 shared task: Syntactic and semantic dependencies in multiple languages. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task, pages 1-18.
12. Eduard Hovy, Mitchell Marcus, Martha Palmer, Lance Ramshaw, and Ralph Weischedel. 2006. Ontonotes: The 90% solution. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, Short Papers, pages 57-60.
13. John Judge, Aoife Cahill, and Josef van Genabith. 2006. Questionbank: Creating a corpus of parseannotated questions. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 497-504.
14. Tao Lei, Yu Xin, Yuan Zhang, Regina Barzilay, and Tommi Jaakkola. 2014. Low-rank tensors for scoring dependency structures. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1381-1391.
15. Mitchell P. Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
16. Andre Martins, Miguel Almeida, and Noah A. Smith. 2013. Turning on the turbo: Fast third-order nonprojective turbo parsers. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 617-622.
17. Joakim Nivre. 2008. Algorithms for deterministic incremental dependency parsing. Computational Linguistics, 34(4):513-553.
18. Joakim Nivre. 2009. Non-projective dependency parsing in expected linear time. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, pages 351-359.
19. Slav Petrov and Ryan McDonald. 2012. Overview of the 2012 shared task on parsing the web. Notes of the First Workshop on Syntactic Analysis of Non-Canonical Language (SANCL).
20. Han Ren, Donghong Ji, Jing Wan, and Mingyao Zhang. 2009. Parsing syntactic and semantic dependencies for multiple languages with a pipeline approach. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task, pages 97-102.
21. Ivan Titov and James Henderson. 2007. Constituent parsing with incremental sigmoid belief networks. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 632-639.
22. Kristina Toutanova, Dan Klein, Christopher D. Manning, and Yoram Singer. 2003. Feature-rich part-of speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 173-180.
23. David Weiss, Chris Alberti, Michael Collins, and Slav Petrov. 2015. Structured training for neural network transition-based parsing. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 323-333.
24. Hao Zhang and Ryan McDonald. 2014. Enforcing structural diversity in cube-pruned dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 656-661.
25. Yue Zhang and Joakim Nivre. 2011. Transition-based dependency parsing with rich non-local features. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 188-193.
26. Hao Zhou, Yue Zhang, and Jiajun Chen. 2015. A neural probabilistic structured-prediction model for transition-based dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1213-1222.