Effects of different cryoprotectants and freezing methods on post-thaw boar semen quality

Reproductive Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 41-46

  Yang, Chung Hsun ^a   Wu, Ting Wen ^a   Cheng, Feng Pang ^b   Wang, Jiann Hsiung ^a   Wu, Jui Te ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAYI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHUNG HSING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Boar; Cryopreservation; Dimethylacetamide; Glycerol; Semen

Indexed keywords

ACETAMIDE DERIVATIVE; CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENT; GLYCEROL; N,N DIMETHYLACETAMIDE;

ANIMAL; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; DRUG EFFECTS; FEMALE; FREEZING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PIG; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERM; SPERM PRESERVATION; VETERINARY;

ACETAMIDES; ANIMALS; CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENTS; FEMALE; FREEZING; GLYCEROL; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL; MALE; PREGNANCY; SEMEN; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SEMEN PRESERVATION; SWINE;

EID: 84959557404     PISSN: 1642431X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.repbio.2015.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Buranaamnuay K., Tummaruk P., Singlor J., Rodriguez-Martinez H., Techakumphu M. Effect of straw volume and Equex-STM on boar sperm quality after cryopreservation. Reprod Domest Anim 2009, 44:69-73.
2. Johnson L.A., Aalbers J.G., Willems C.M.T., Sybesma W. Use of boar semen for artificial insemination I. Fertility capacity of fresh and frozen spermatozoa in sows on 36 farms. J Anim Sci 1981, 52:1130-1136.
3. Parkinson T.J. Artificial insemination. Veterinary reproduction and obstetrics 2009, 765-806. W. B. Saunders Company Ltd, London. 9th ed. D.E. Noakes, T.J. Parkinson, G.C.W. England (Eds.).
4. King G.J., Macpherson J.W. Boar semen studies II. Laboratory and fertility results of a method for deep freezing. Can J Comp Med Vet Sci 1967, 31:46-47.
5. Watson P.F. The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Anim Reprod Sci 2000, 60/61:481-492.
6. Corcuera B.D., Marigorta P., Sagüés A., Saiz-Cidoncha F., Pérez-Gutiérrez J.F. Effect of lactose and glycerol on the motility, normal apical ridge, chromatin condensation and chromatin stability of frozen boar spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2007, 67:1150-1157.
7. Bianchi I., Calderam K., Maschio E.F., Madeira E.M., da Rosa Ulguim R., Corcini C.D., et al. Evaluation of amides and centrifugation temperature in boar semen cryopreservation. Theriogenology 2008, 69:632-638.
8. Wu T.W., Cheng F.P., Chen I.H., Yang C.H., Tsai M.Y., Chang M.H., et al. The combinatorial effect of different Equex STM paste concentrations, cyroprotectants and the straw-freezing methods on the post-thaw boar semen quality. Reprod Domest Anim 2013, 48:53-58.
9. Hanada A., Nagase H. Cryoprotective effects of some amides on rabbit spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1980, 60:247-252.
10. Tselutin K., Seigneurin F., Blesbois E. Comparison of cryoprotectants and methods of cryopreservation of fowl spermatozoa. Poult Sci 1999, 78:586-590.
11. Squires E.L., Keith S.L., Graham J.K. Evaluation of alternative cryoprotectants for preserving stallion spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2004, 62:1056-1065.
12. Ashwood-Smit M.J. Mechanism of cryoprotectant action. Symp Soc Exp Biol 1987, 41:395-406.
13. Watson P.F. Recent development and concepts in the cryopreservation of spermatozoa and the assessment of their post-thawing function. Reprod Fertil Dev 1995, 7:871-891.
14. Hay J.C., Chao D.S., Kuo C.S., Scheller R.H. Protein interactions regulating vesicle transport between the endoplasmic reticulum and golgi apparatus in mammalian cells. Cell 1997, 89:149-158.
15. Blanco J.M., Gee G., Wildt D.E., Donoghue A.M. Species variation in osmotic, cryoprotectant, and cooling rate tolerance in poultry, eagle, and peregrine falcon spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 2000, 63:1164-1171.
16. Ball B.A., Vo A. Osmotic tolerance of equine spermatozoa and the effects of soluble cryoprotectants on equine sperm motility, viability and mitochondrial membrane potential. J Androl 2001, 22:1061-1069.
17. Mazur P., Leibo S.P., Farrant J., Chu E.H.Y., Hanna M.G., Smith L.H. Interactions of cooling rate, warming rate and protective additive on the survival of frozen mammalian cells 1970, 69-88. The Frozen Cell, London, Churchill. G.E.W. Wolstenholme, M. O'Connor (Eds.).
18. Peńa A., Linder-Forseberg C. Effects of equex, one- or two-step dilution, and two freezing and thawing rates on post-thaw survival of dog spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2000, 54:859-875.
19. Songsasen N., Leibo S.P. Cryopreservation of mouse spermatozoa II. Relationship between survival after cryopreservation and osmotic tolerance of spermatozoa from three strains of mice. Cryobiology 1997, 32:255-269.
20. Hammadeh M.E., Askari A.S., Gerrg T., Rosenbaum P., Schmidt W. Effect of freeze-thawing procedure on chromatin stability, morphological alteration and membrane integrity of human spermatozoa in fertile and subfertile men. Int J Androl 1999, 22:155-162.
21. Brillard J.P., McDaniel G.R. The reliability and efficiency of various methods for estimating spermatozoa concentration. Poult Sci 1985, 64:155-158.
22. Garcia J.C., Dominguez J.C., Pena F.J., Alegre B., Gonzalez R., Castro M.J., et al. Thawing boar semen in the presence of seminal plasma: effects on sperm quality and fertility. Anim Reprod Sci 2010, 119:160-165.
23. Blom E. A one-minute live-dead sperm stain by means of eosin-nigrosin. Fertil Steril 1950, 1:176-177.
24. Oettle E.E., Soley J.T. Sperm abnormalities in the dog: a light and electron microscopic study. Vet Med Rev 1988, 59:28-70.
25. Cheng F.P., Fazeli A.R., Voorhout W.F., Marks A., Bevers M.M., Colenbrander B. Use of PNA (peanut agglutinin) to assess the acrosomal status and the zona pellucida induced acrosome reaction in stallion spermatozoa. J Androl 1996, 17:674-682.
26. Farlin M.E., Jasko D.J., Graham J.K., Squires E.L. Assessment of Pisum sativum agglutinin in identifying acrosomal damage in stallion spermatozoa. Mol Reprod Dev 1992, 32:23-27.
27. Lwoff L., Bézard J., Paquignon M. Comparison of conservation technologies of boar spermatozoa. Effect on the mechanisms of fertilization. J Rech Porcine Fr 1987, 19:79-86.
28. Malo C., Gil L., Cano R., Martínez F., García A., Jerez R.A. Dimethylformamide is not better than glycerol for cryopreservation of boar semen. J Androl 2012, 44:605-610.
29. Kim S., Lee Y.J., Ji D.B., Kim Y.J. Evaluation of different cryoprotectants (CPAs) in boar semen cryopreservation. J Vet Med Sci 2011, 73:961-963.
30. Moustacas V.S., Cruz B.C., Varago F.C., Miranda D.A., Lage P.G., Henry M. Extenders containing dimethylformamide associated or not with glycerol are ineffective for ovine sperm cryopreservation. Reprod Domest Anim 2011, 46:924-925.
31. Iaffaldano N., Iorio M.D., Rosato M.P. The cryoprotectant used, its concentration, and the equilibration time are critical for the successful cryopreservation of rabbit sperm: dimethylacetamide versus dimethylsulfoxide. Theriogenology 2012, 78:1381-1389.
32. Thurston L.M., Holt W.V., Watson P.F. Post-thaw functional status of boar spermatozoa cryopreserved using three controlled rate freezers: a comparison. Theriogenology 2003, 60:101-113.