Surgeon-Specific Reports in General Surgery: Establishing Benchmarks for Peer Comparison Within a Single Hospital

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 222, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 113-121

  Hatfield, Mark D ^a,b   Ashton, Carol M ^a   Bass, Barbara L ^a   Shirkey, Beverly A ^a  

^a HOUSTON METHODIST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVABLE BENCHMARK OF CARE; ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CURRENT PROCEDURAL TERMINOLOGY; GENERAL SURGERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HIGH VOLUME HOSPITAL; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; LOW VOLUME HOSPITAL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGEON; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL MORTALITY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SURGERY; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; WORKLOAD;

BENCHMARKING; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ADJUSTMENT; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; WORKLOAD;

EID: 84959465286     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: 18791190     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.10.017     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. S.F. Khuri, J. Daley, and W.G. Henderson The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs Arch Surg 137 2002 20 27
2. S.F. Khuri The NSQIP: A new frontier in surgery Surgery 138 2005 837 843
3. K.S. Rowell, F.E. Turrentine, M.M. Hutter, and et al. Use of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data as a catalyst for quality improvement J Am Coll Surg 204 2007 1293 1300
4. S.F. Khuri, W.G. Henderson, J. Daley, and et al. The Patient Safety in Surgery study: background, study design, and patient populations J Am Coll Surg 204 2007 1089 1102
5. B.L. Hall, B.H. Hamilton, K. Richards, and et al. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals Ann Surg 250 2009 363 376
6. A.M. Ingraham, K.E. Richards, B.L. Hall, and C.Y. Ko Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach Adv Surg 44 2010 251 267
7. O.D. Guillamondegui, O.L. Gunter, L. Hines, and et al. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative to improve surgical outcomes J Am Coll Surg 214 2012 709 714
8. K.M. Itani Fifteen years of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in review Am J Surg 198 2009 S9 S18
9. M. Maruthappu, M.A. El-Harasis, M. Nagendran, and et al. Systematic review of methodological quality of individual performance measurement in surgery Br J Surg 101 2014 1491 1498
10. American College of Surgeons. Surgeon Specific Registry. Chicago, IL. Available at: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/ssr. Accessed March 30, 2015.
11. S.G. Yi, N.P. Wray, S.L. Jones, and et al. Surgeon-specific performance reports in general surgery: an observational study of initial implementation and adoption J Am Coll Surg 217 2013 636 647
12. Merriam-Webster. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Springfield, MA. Available at: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/benchmark. Accessed March 30, 2015.
13. N.W. Weissman, J.J. Allison, C.I. Kiefe, and et al. Achievable benchmarks of care: the ABCs of benchmarking J Eval Clin Pract 5 1999 269 281
14. R.M. Coffey, T.L. Matthews, and K. McDermott Diabetes Care Quality Improvement: A Resource Guide for State Action (Prepared by The Medstat Group, Inc. and The Council of State Governments under Contract No. 290-00-0004) September 2004 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Department of Health and Human Services Rockville, MD AHRQ Pub. No. 04-0072
15. C.I. Kiefe, N.W. Weissman, J.J. Allison, and et al. Identifying achievable benchmarks of care: concepts and methodology Int J Qual Health Care 10 1998 443 447
16. C.I. Kiefe, J.J. Allison, O.D. Williams, and et al. Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback: a randomized controlled trial JAMA 285 2001 2871 2879
17. M. Zhu, and A.Y. Lu The Counter-intuitive Non-informative Prior for the Bernoulli Family J Stat Educ 12 2004 1 10
18. A. Agresti Categorical Data Analysis 1st ed. 1990 John Wiley & Sons New York, NY
19. ACS NSQIP Operations Manual 2014 American College of Surgeons Chicago, IL
20. L.D. Brown, T.T. Cai, and A. DasGupta Interval estimation for a binomial proportion Stat Sci 16 2001 101 117
21. N. Ivers, G. Jamtvedt, S. Flottorp, and et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes Cochrane Db Syst Rev 6 2012 1 227
22. W.G. Henderson, and J. Daley Design and statistical methodology of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: why is it what it is? Am J Surg 198 Suppl 2009 S19 S27