Quality improvement in surgery: The American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program approach

Advances in Surgery

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 251-267

  Ingraham, Angela M ^a,b   Richards, Karen E ^a   Hall, Bruce L ^c,d,e   Ko, Clifford Y ^a,f  

^a AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Section of Endocrine and Oncology Surgery   (United States)

^e WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MEDICAL SOCIETY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURGERY; TEACHING HOSPITAL; UNITED STATES; STANDARDS;

BENCHMARKING; HEALTH POLICY; HOSPITALS, TEACHING; HOSPITALS, VETERANS; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; LOGISTIC MODELS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; SURGERY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77956150053     PISSN: 00653411     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2010.05.003     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed?. JAMA 1988, 260(12):1743-1748.
2. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1966, 44(3):166-206.
3. Bratzler D.W., Nsa W., Houck P.M. Performance measures for pneumonia: are they valuable, and are process measures adequate?. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2007, 20(2):182-189.
4. Birkmeyer J.D., Dimick J.B., Birkmeyer N.J. Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes?. J Am Coll Surg 2004, 198(4):626-632.
5. Ko C.Y., Maggard M., Agustin M. Quality in surgery: current issues for the future. World J Surg 2005, 29(10):1204-1209.
6. Khuri S.F., Daley J., Henderson W., et al. Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg 1997, 185(4):315-327.
7. Daley J., Khuri S.F., Henderson W., et al. Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg 1997, 185(4):328-340.
8. Daley J., Forbes M.G., Young G.J., et al. Validating risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: site visit assessment of process and structure. National VA Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg 1997, 185(4):341-351.
9. Khuri S.F., Daley J., Henderson W., et al. The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care. J Am Coll Surg 1995, 180(5):519-531.
10. Khuri S.F., Daley J., Henderson W., et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 1998, 228(4):491-507.
11. Leadership by example. Coordinating government roles in improving healthcare quality 2002, National Academic Press, Washington, DC. J.M. Corrigan, J. Eden, B.M. Smith (Eds.).
12. Khuri S.F. The NSQIP: a new frontier in surgery. Surgery 2005, 138(5):837-843.
13. Fink A.S., Campbell D.A., Mentzer R.M., et al. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility. Ann Surg 2002, 236(3):344-353. [discussion: 353-4].
14. Khuri S.F., Henderson W.G., Daley J., et al. The patient safety in surgery study: background, study design, and patient populations. J Am Coll Surg 2007, 204(6):1089-1102.
15. Khuri S.F., Henderson W.G., Daley J., et al. Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study. Ann Surg 2008, 248(2):329-336.
16. Hall B.L., Hamilton B.H., Richards K., et al. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals. Ann Surg 2009, 250(3):363-376.
17. Shiloach M., Frencher S.K., Steeger J.E., et al. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 2010, 210(1):6-16.
18. Guller U., Hervey S., Purves H., et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 2004, 239(1):43-52.
19. Delaney C.P., Chang E., Senagore A.J., et al. Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 2008, 247(5):819-824.
20. Shahian D.M., Silverstein T., Lovett A.F., et al. Comparison of clinical and administrative data sources for hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards. Circulation 2007, 115(12):1518-1527.
21. Krumholz H.M., Brindis R.G., Brush J.E., et al. Standards for statistical models used for public reporting of health outcomes: an American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Writing Group: cosponsored by the Council on Epidemiology and Prevention and the Stroke Council. Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Circ J 2006, 113(3):456-462.
22. Parker J.P., Li Z., Damberg C.L., et al. Administrative versus clinical data for coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards: the view from California. Med Care 2006, 44(7):687-695.
23. Best W.R., Khuri S.F., Phelan M., et al. Identifying patient preoperative risk factors and postoperative adverse events in administrative databases: results from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 2002, 194(3):257-266.
24. Romano P.S., Chan B.K., Schembri M.E., et al. Can administrative data be used to compare postoperative complication rates across hospitals?. Med Care 2002, 40(10):856-867.
25. American College of Surgeons. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program operations manual; 2007.
26. Bilimoria KY, Cohen ME, Ingraham AM, et al. Effect of postdischarge morbidity and mortality on comparisons of hospital surgical quality. Ann Surg. (Epub ahead of publication).
27. Campbell D.A. Quality improvement is local. J Am Coll Surg 2009, 209(1):141-143.
28. Velanovich V., Rubinfeld I., Patton J.H., et al. Implementation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: critical steps to success for surgeons and hospitals. Am J Med Qual 2009, 24(6):474-479.
29. O'Connor G.T., Plume S.K., Olmstead E.M., et al. A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. JAMA 1996, 275(11):841-846.
30. Moscucci M., Share D., Kline-Rogers E., et al. The Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) collaborative quality improvement initiative in percutaneous coronary interventions. J Interv Cardiol 2002, 15(5):381-386.
31. Pronovost P., Needham D., Berenholtz S., et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2006, 355(26):2725-2732.
32. Institute of Medicine Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the twenty-first century 2001, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
33. Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council Cardiac surgery in Pennsylvania: 2005-2006 Available at:, Accessed February 24, 2009. http://www.phc4.org/reports/cabg/06/default.htm.
34. New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services Cardiac surgery in New Jersey: 2004 Available at:, Accessed February 24, 2009. http://www.state.nj.us/health/healthcarequality/documents/cardconsumer04.pdf.
35. Shroyer A.L., Coombs L.P., Peterson E.D., et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons: 30-day operative mortality and morbidity risk models. Ann Thorac Surg 2003, 75(6):1856-1864. [discussion: 1864-55].
36. Grover F.L., Shroyer A.L., Hammermeister K., et al. A decade's experience with quality improvement in cardiac surgery using the Veterans Affairs and Society of Thoracic Surgeons national databases. Ann Surg 2001, 234(4):464-472. [discussion: 472-4].
37. Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular registry Available at:, Accessed May 5, 2009. http://www.vascularweb.org/professionals/Vascular_Registry/index.html.
38. United States House of Representatives. H.R.1: Making supplemental appropriations for job preservation and creation, infrastructure investment, energy efficiency and science, assistance to the unemployed, and State and local fiscal stabilization, for fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes; United State House of Representatives Bill; 2009.
39. Dimick J.B., Chen S.L., Taheri P.A., et al. Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: a report from the private-sector National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 2004, 199(4):531-537.
40. Englesbe M.J., Dimick J., Mathur A., et al. Who pays for biliary complications following liver transplant? A business case for quality improvement. Am J Transplant 2006, 6(12):2978-2982.
41. Dimick J.B., Weeks W.B., Karia R.J., et al. Who pays for poor surgical quality? Building a business case for quality improvement. J Am Coll Surg 2006, 202(6):933-937.
42. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Medicare and Medicaid move aggressively to encourage greater patient safety in hospitals and reduce never events Available at:. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/apps/media/press/release.asp?
43. Olsen M.A., Chu-Ongsakul S., Brandt K.E., et al. Hospital-associated costs due to surgical site infection after breast surgery. Arch Surg 2008, 143(1):53-60. [discussion: 61].
44. Pronovost P., Garrett E., Dorman T., et al. Variations in complication rates and opportunities for improvement in quality of care for patients having abdominal aortic surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2001, 386(4):249-256.
45. Cocanour C.S., Ostrosky-Zeichner L., Peninger M., et al. Cost of a ventilator-associated pneumonia in a shock trauma intensive care unit. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2005, 6(1):65-72.
46. Safdar N., Dezfulian C., Collard H.R., et al. Clinical and economic consequences of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2005, 33(10):2184-2193.
47. Warren D.K., Shukla S.J., Olsen M.A., et al. Outcome and attributable cost of ventilator-associated pneumonia among intensive care unit patients in a suburban medical center. Crit Care Med 2003, 31(5):1312-1317.
48. Patton Jr JH, Ritz J, Rubinfeld I, et al. Revenue opportunities in quality: leveraging data accuracy for improved RVU Yield. American College of Surgeons National Surgical quality improvement program Annual Conference. Boca Raton (FL); 2008.
49. National Quality Forum NQF # 0534: hospital specific risk-adjusted measure of mortality or one or more major complications within 30 days of a lower extremity bypass (LEB) Available at:, Accessed June 11, 2009. http://www.qualityforum.org/Measures_List.aspx.
50. Birkmeyer J.D., Shahian D.M., Dimick J.B., et al. Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg 2008, 207(5):777-782.
51. Schilling P.L., Dimick J.B., Birkmeyer J.D. Prioritizing quality improvement in general surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2008, 207(5):698-704.
52. Raval M.V., Bilimoria K.Y., Cohen M.E., et al. The next generation of quality assessment - developing a specialty and outcome specific American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2009, American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress, Chicago (IL).
53. Rural Assistance Center CAH [Critical Access Hospitals] frequently asked questions Available at:, Accessed November 15, 2009. http://www.raconline.org/info_guides/hospitals/cahfaq.php#howmany.
54. Cohen M.E., Bilimoria K.Y., Ko C.Y., et al. Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2009, 208(6):1009-1016.
55. Pronovost P.J., Faden R.R. Setting priorities for patient safety: ethics, accountability, and public engagement. JAMA 2009, 302(8):890-891.