When Children Become Adults: Should Biobanks Re-Contact?

PLoS Medicine

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2016, Pages

  Giesbertz, Noor A A ^a   Bredenoord, Annelien L ^a   van Delden, Johannes J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOBANK; CHILDHOOD CANCER; CLINICAL DATA REPOSITORY; HUMAN; IMMATURITY; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; PATIENT AUTONOMY; ADULT; CHILD; CONFIDENTIALITY; INFORMED CONSENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARENT; PSYCHOLOGY;

ADULT; BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; CHILD; CONFIDENTIALITY; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PARENTS;

EID: 84959464338     PISSN: 15491277     EISSN: 15491676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001959     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Henderson GE, Cadigan RJ, Edwards TP, Conlon I, Nelson AG, Evans JP, et al. Characterizing biobank organizations in the U.S.: results from a national survey. Genome Med. 2013Jan25. 5:3. doi: 10.1186/gm40723351549
2. Kaiser J, Genetics. U.S. hospital launches large biobank of children’s DNA. Science. 2006;312: 1584–1585.
3. Salvaterra E, Giorda R, Bassi MT, Borgatti R, Knudsen LE, Martinuzzi A, et al. Pediatric biobanking: a pilot qualitative survey of practices, rules, and researcher opinions in ten European countries. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 2012;10: 29–36. doi: 10.1089/bio.2011.003724849751
4. Hens K, Cassiman JJ, Nys H, Dierickx K, Children, biobanks and the scope of parental consent. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19: 735–739. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.2921386873
5. Burke W, Diekema DS, Ethical issues arising from the participation of children in genetic research. J Pediatr. 2006;149: S34–S38. 16829241
6. Resnik D, Re-consent upon reaching the age of majority: ethical issues. Journal of clinical research best practices. 2014;10: 2. http://firstclinical.com/journal/2014/1402_Reconsent.pdf.
7. Ries NM, LeGrandeur J, Caulfield T, Handling ethical, legal and social issues in birth cohort studies involving genetic research: responses from studies in six countries. BMC Med Ethics. 2010;11: doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-4
8. Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia GroupParent/guardian information leaflet. 2013. https://www.securecloudhost.co.uk/cclg.org.uk/dynamic_files/PIS%20V2_0%2024%20May%202013%20(watermarked).pdf
9. Giesbertz NAA, Bredenoord AL, van Delden JJM, Consent procedures in pediatric biobanks. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23: 1129–1134. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.26725537361
10. Council for International Organizations of Medical SciencesInternational Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: CIOMS; 2002.
11. World Medical AssociationWMA Declaration of Helsinki—ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Fortaleza: WMA; 2013.
12. Hens K, Nys H, Cassiman JJ, Dierickx K, Biological sample collections from minors for genetic research: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17: 979–990. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.919223929
13. Helgesson G, Children, longitudinal studies, and informed consent. Med Health Care Philos. 2005;8: 307–313. 16283493
14. Berlin I, Berlin I, Two concepts of liberty. In: Four Essays on Liberty. London, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 1969. p. 118–172.
15. Bredenoord AL, Onland-Moret NC, van Delden JJM, Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: in favor of a qualified disclosure policy. Hum Mutat. 2011;32: 861–867. doi: 10.1002/humu.2151821538687
16. Giesbertz NAA, Bredenoord AL, van Delden JJM, Inclusion of residual tissue in biobanks: opt-in or opt-out?PLoS Biol. 2012;10: e1001373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.100137322899893
17. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF, Beauchamp TL, Childress JF, Respect for autonomy. In: Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 99–148.
18. Bredenoord AL, de Vries MC, van Delden H, The right to an open future concerning genetic information. Am J Bioeth. 2014;14: 21–23.
19. Bredenoord AL, Kroes HY, Cuppen E, Parker M, van Delden JJM, Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered. Trends Genet. 2011;27: 41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.11.00421190750
20. Hens K, Van El CE, Borry P, Cambon-Thomsen A, Cornel MC, Forzano F, et al. Developing a policy for paediatric biobanks: principles for good practice. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21: 2–7. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.9922713814
21. Bredenoord AL, de Vries MC, van Delden JJM, Next-generation sequencing: does the next generation still have a right to an open future?Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14: 306. 23729034
22. Goldenberg AJ, Hull SC, Botkin JR, Wilfond BS, Pediatric biobanks: approaching informed consent for continuing research after children grow up. J Pediatr. 2009;155: 578–583. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.04.03419595370
23. Gymrek M, McGuire AL, Golan D, Halperin E, Erlich Y, Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science. 2013;339: 321–324. doi: 10.1126/science.122956623329047
24. Nissenbaum H, Privacy in Context. 1st ed.Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2010.
25. Wolf LE, Bouley TA, McCulloch CE, Genetic research with stored biological materials: ethics and practice. IRB. 2010;32: 7–18.
26. Gurwitz D, Fortier I, Lunshof JE, Knoppers BM, Children and population biobanks. Science. 2009;325: 818–819. doi: 10.1126/science.1173284
27. Gurwitz D, Data re-identification: protect the children. Science. 2013;339: 1033.
28. Hens K, Wright J, Dierickx K, Biobanks: oversight offers protection. Science. 2009;326: 798–799.
29. Hansson MG, Maschke KJ, Biobanks: questioning distinctions. Science. 2009;326: 797.
30. Brothers KB, Clayton EW, Biobanks: too long to wait for consent. Science. 2009;326: 798.
31. Árnason V, Solbakk JH, Holm S, Hofmann B, Scientific citizenship, benefit, and protection in population-based research. In: The Ethics of Research Biobanking. Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York: Springer Science + Buiness Media, LLC; 2009. pp. 131–141.
32. Linabery AM, Slater ME, Spector LG, Olshan AF, Stork SK, Roesler MA, et al. Feasibility of neonatal dried blood spot retrieval amid evolving state policies (2009–2010): a Children’s Oncology Group study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011;25: 549–558. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2011.01228.x21980944
33. Parker L, Using human tissue: when do we need consent?J Med Ethics. 2011;37: 759–761. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100043
34. Holm S, Informed consent and the biobanking of materials from children. Genomics, Society and Policy. 2005;1: 16–26.
35. Giesbertz NAA, Bredenoord AL, van Delden JJM, Clarifying assent in pediatric research. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22: 266–269. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.11923756442