Misrepresentation and amendment of soil moisture in conceptual hydrological modelling

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 535, Issue , 2016, Pages 637-651

  Zhuo, Lu ^a   Han, Dawei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Holding excess runoff; Satellite soil moisture observations; Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS); Soil moisture deficit (SMD); Soil Moisture Deficit to Saturation (SMDS); Xinanjiang (XAJ)

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOODS; HYDROLOGY; MOISTURE; RUNOFF; SOILS;

HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING; HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; REAL TIME FLOOD FORECASTING; SATELLITE SOIL MOISTURE; SOIL MOISTURE AND OCEAN SALINITY (SMOS); SOIL MOISTURE DEFICITS; XINANJIANG (XAJ);

SOIL MOISTURE;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CATCHMENT; FLOOD FORECASTING; FLOW MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; RUNOFF; SALINE SOIL; SATELLITE DATA; SOIL AMENDMENT; SOIL MOISTURE; SOIL WATER POTENTIAL;

CHINA; XINANJIANG RESERVOIR; ZHEJIANG;

EID: 84959420022     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.033     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Al-Shrafany D., Rico-Ramirez M.A., Han D., Bray M. Comparative assessment of soil moisture estimation from land surface model and satellite remote sensing based on catchment water balance. Meteorol. Appl. 2013, 21(3):521-534.
2. Al Bitar A., Leroux D., Kerr Y.H., Merlin O., Richaume P., Sahoo A., Wood E.F. Evaluation of SMOS soil moisture products over continental US using the SCAN/SNOTEL network. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2012, 50(5):1572-1586.
3. Aubert D., Loumagne C., Oudin L. Sequential assimilation of soil moisture and streamflow data in a conceptual rainfall-runoff model. J. Hydrol. 2003, 280(1):145-161.
4. Bartholomé E., Belward A. GLC2000: a new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2005, 26(9):1959-1977.
5. Berthet L., Andréassian V., Perrin C., Javelle P. How crucial is it to account for the antecedent moisture conditions in flood forecasting? Comparison of event-based and continuous approaches on 178 catchments. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2009, (13):p. 819-p. 831.
6. Beven K.J. Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: the Primer 2012, John Wiley & Sons.
7. Brocca L., Melone F., Moramarco T., Wagner W., Naeimi V., Bartalis Z., Hasenauer S. Improving runoff prediction through the assimilation of the ASCAT soil moisture product. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2010, 7(4):4113-4144.
8. Brocca L., Moramarco T., Melone F., Wagner W., Hasenauer S., Hahn S. Assimilation of surface-and root-zone ASCAT soil moisture products into rainfall-runoff modeling. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2012, 50(7):2542-2555.
9. Calder I., Harding R., Rosier P. An objective assessment of soil-moisture deficit models. J. Hydrol. 1983, 60(1):329-355.
10. Chen J., Adams B.J. Integration of artificial neural networks with conceptual models in rainfall-runoff modeling. J. Hydrol. 2006, 318(1):232-249.
11. Chen X., Yang T., Wang X., Xu C.-Y., Yu Z. Uncertainty intercomparison of different hydrological models in simulating extreme flows. Water Resour. Manage. 2013, 27(5):1393-1409.
12. Christian R.J. Validation and intercomparison of different updating procedures for real-time forecasting. Nordic Hydrol. 1997, 28(2):65-84.
13. Corradini C. Soil moisture in the development of hydrological processes and its determination at different spatial scales. J. Hydrol. 2014, (516):1-5.
14. Daly C., Neilson R.P., Phillips D.L. A statistical-topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain. J. Appl. Meteorol. 1994, 33(2):140-158.
15. Djamai N., Magagi R., Goïta K., Hosseini M., Cosh M.H., Berg A., Toth B. Evaluation of SMOS soil moisture products over the CanEx-SM10 area. J. Hydrol. 2015, 520:254-267.
16. Dunne T. Field studies of hillslope flow processes. Hillslope Hydrol. 1978, 227:293.
17. Escorihuela M.-J., Chanzy A., Wigneron J.-P., Kerr Y. Effective soil moisture sampling depth of L-band radiometry: a case study. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114(5):995-1001.
18. Fang B., Lakshmi V. Soil moisture at watershed scale: remote sensing techniques. J. Hydrol. 2014, 516:258-272.
19. Gan T.Y., Dlamini E.M., Biftu G.F. Effects of model complexity and structure, data quality, and objective functions on hydrologic modeling. J. Hydrol. 1997, 192(1):81-103.
20. Geris J., Tetzlaff D., Seibert J., Vis M., Soulsby C. Conceptual modelling to assess hydrological impacts and evaluate environmental flow scenarios in montane river systems regulated for hydropower. River Res. Appl. 2014, 10.1002/rra.2813.
21. Gill M.A. Flood routing by the Muskingum method. J. Hydrol. 1978, 36(3):353-363.
22. Hansen M., DeFries R., Townshend J.R.G., Sohlberg R. UMD global land cover classification. 1 Kilometer, Department of Geography 1998, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, 1981-1994.
23. Huza J., Teuling A.J., Braud I., Grazioli J., Melsen L.A., Nord G., Raupach T.H., Uijlenhoet R. Precipitation, soil moisture and runoff variability in a small river catchment (Ardèche, France) during HyMeX Special Observation Period 1. J. Hydrol. 2014, 516:330-342.
24. Jayawardena A., Zhou M. A modified spatial soil moisture storage capacity distribution curve for the Xinanjiang model. J. Hydrol. 2000, 227(1):93-113.
25. Kerr Y.H., Waldteufel P., Richaume P., Wigneron J.-P., Ferrazzoli P., Mahmoodi A., Al Bitar A., Cabot F., Gruhier C., Juglea S.E. The SMOS soil moisture retrieval algorithm. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2012, 50(5):1384-1403.
26. Kerr Y.H., Waldteufel P., Wigneron J.-P., Delwart S., Cabot F., Boutin J., Escorihuela M.-J., Font J., Reul N., Gruhier C. The SMOS mission: new tool for monitoring key elements of the global water cycle. Proc. IEEE 2010, 98(5):666-687.
27. Kerr Y.H., Waldteufel P., Wigneron J.-P., Martinuzzi J., Font J., Berger M. Soil moisture retrieval from space: the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2001, 39(8):1729-1735.
28. Kirchner J.W. Getting the right answers for the right reasons: linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology. Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42(3).
29. Kitanidis P.K., Bras R.L. Adaptive filtering through detection of isolated transient errors in rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour. Res. 1980, 16(4):740-748.
30. Kitanidis P.K., Bras R.L. Real-time forecasting with a conceptual hydrological model 1-analysis of uncertainty. Water Resour. Res. 1980, 16(6):1025-1033.
31. Krause P., Boyle D., Bäse F. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv. Geosci. 2005, 5:89-97.
32. Lacava T., Matgen P., Brocca L., Bittelli M., Pergola N., Moramarco T., Tramutoli V. A first assessment of the SMOS soil moisture product with in situ and modeled data in Italy and Luxembourg. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2012, 50(5):1612-1622.
33. Louvet S., Pellarin T., al Bitar A., Cappelaere B., Galle S., Grippa M., Gruhier C., Kerr Y., Lebel T., Mialon A. SMOS soil moisture product evaluation over West-Africa from local to regional scale. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 156:383-394.
34. Lu N., Likos W.J. Rate of capillary rise in soil. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2004, 130(6):646-650.
35. Matgen P., Fenicia F., Heitz S., Plaza D., de Keyser R., Pauwels V.R., Wagner W., Savenije H. Can ASCAT-derived soil wetness indices reduce predictive uncertainty in well-gauged areas? A comparison with in situ observed soil moisture in an assimilation application. Adv. Water Resour. 2012, 44:49-65.
36. Mitchell K.E., Lohmann D., Houser P.R., Wood E.F., Schaake J.C., Robock A., Cosgrove B.A., Sheffield J., Duan Q., Luo L. The multi-institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. (1984-2012) 2004, 109(D7). 10.1029/2003JD003823.
37. Moore R. The PDM rainfall-runoff model. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2007, 11(1):483-499.
38. Moore R.E., Cole R.C. Water conduction from shallow water tables. University of California 1939, 10.3733/hilg.v12n06p383.
39. Moriasi D., Arnold J., Van Liew M., Bingner R., Harmel R., Veith T. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans. ASABE 2007, 50(3):885-900.
40. Nash J., Sutcliffe J. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I-A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 1970, 10(3):282-290.
41. Njoku E.G., Kong J.A. Theory for passive microwave remote sensing of near-surface soil moisture. J. Geophys. Res. 1977, 82(20):3108-3118.
42. Ottlé C., Vidal-Madjar D. Assimilation of soil moisture inferred from infrared remote sensing in a hydrological model over the HAPEX-MOBILHY region. J. Hydrol. 1994, 158(3):241-264.
43. Parajka J., Naeimi V., Blöschl G., Wagner W., Merz R., Scipal K. Assimilating scatterometer soil moisture data into conceptual hydrologic models at the regional scale. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2006, 10(3):353-368.
44. Peel M.C., Finlayson B.L., McMahon T.A. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2007, 4(2):439-473.
45. Peng G., Leslie L.M., Shao Y. Environmental Modelling and Prediction 2002, Springer.
46. Perrin C., Michel C., Andréassian V. Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments. J. Hydrol. 2001, 242(3):275-301.
47. Reed S., Koren V., Smith M., Zhang Z., Moreda F., Seo D.-J., Participants D.M.I.P. Overall distributed model intercomparison project results. J. Hydrol. 2004, 298(1):27-60.
48. Ridler M.E., Madsen H., Stisen S., Bircher S., Fensholt R. Assimilation of SMOS-derived soil moisture in a fully integrated hydrological and soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer model in Western Denmark. Water Resour. Res. 2014, 50(11):8962-8981.
49. Romano N. Soil moisture at local scale: measurements and simulations. J. Hydrol. 2014, 516:6-20.
50. Rubin J. Theory of rainfall uptake by soils initially drier than their field capacity and its applications. Water Resour. Res. 1966, 2(4):739-749.
51. Rushton K., Eilers V., Carter R. Improved soil moisture balance methodology for recharge estimation. J. Hydrol. 2006, 318(1):379-399.
52. Schmugge, T., 1980. Soil moisture sensing with microwave radiometers, LARS Symposia. The Laboratory for Applications of Remote Sensing. Purdue University, pp. 392.
53. Shi P., Chen C., Srinivasan R., Zhang X., Cai T., Fang X., Qu S., Chen X., Li Q. Evaluating the SWAT model for hydrological modeling in the Xixian watershed and a comparison with the XAJ model. Water Resour. Manage. 2011, 25(10):2595-2612.
54. SMOS-BEC, 2014. SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre ocean and land products description.
55. Srivastava P.K., Han D., Ramirez M.R., Islam T. Appraisal of SMOS soil moisture at a catchment scale in a temperate maritime climate. J. Hydrol. 2013, 498:292-304.
56. Srivastava P.K., Han D., Ramirez M.R., Islam T. Machine learning techniques for downscaling SMOS satellite soil moisture using MODIS land surface temperature for hydrological application. Water Resour. Manage. 2013, 27(8):3127-3144.
57. Srivastava P.K., Han D., Ramirez M.R., O'Neil P., Islam T., Gupta M. Assessment of SMOS soil moisture retrieval parameters using tau-omega algorithms for soil moisture deficit estimation. J. Hydrol. 2014, 519:574-587.
58. Todini E. The ARNO rainfall-runoff model. J. Hydrol. 1996, 175(1):339-382.
59. Ulaby, F., Moore, R., Fung, A., 1986. Volume 3-From theory to applications, Microwave Remote Sensing: Active and Passive, pp. 1116.
60. Veihmeyer F., Hendrickson A. The moisture equivalent as a measure of the field capacity of soils. Soil Sci. 1931, 32(3):181-194.
61. Wagner W., Bloschl G., Pampaloni P., Calvet J.-C., Bizzarri B., Wigneron J.-P., Kerr Y. Operational readiness of microwave remote sensing of soil moisture for hydrologic applications. Nordic Hydrol. 2007, 38(1):1-20.
62. Wanders N., Karssenberg D., Roo A.d., de Jong S., Bierkens M. The suitability of remotely sensed soil moisture for improving operational flood forecasting. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2014, 18(6):2343-2357.
63. Wang Q. The genetic algorithm and its application to calibrating conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour. Res. 1991, 27(9):2467-2471.
64. Webb, R.W., Rosenzweig, C.E., Levine, E.R., 2000. Global Soil Texture and Derived Water-Holding Capacities (Webb et al.). Data set. Available on-line from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA. http://www.daac.ornl.gov.
65. Wood E.F., Lettenmaier D., Liang X., Nijssen B., Wetzel S.W. Hydrological modeling of continental-scale basins. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 1997, 25(1):279-300.
66. Xia Y., Mitchell K., Ek M., Sheffield J., Cosgrove B., Wood E., Luo L., Alonge C., Wei H., Meng J. Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for the North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS-2): 1. Intercomparison and application of model products. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. (1984-2012) 2012, 117(D3).
67. Zhao R. The Xinanjiang model. Hydrol. Forecast. Proc. Oxford Symp., IASH 1980, 129:351-356.
68. Zhao R. The Xinanjiang model applied in China. J. Hydrol. 1992, 135(1):371-381.
69. Zhao, R., Liu, X., 1995. The Xinanjiang model. In: Singh, V.P. (Ed.), Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, pp. 215-232.
70. Zhuo L., Dai Q., Han D. Meta-analysis of flow modeling performances-to build a matching system between catchment complexity and model types. Hydrol. Process. 2014, 10.1002/hyp.10371.
71. Zhuo L., Dai Q., Han D. Evaluation of SMOS soil moisture retrievals over the central United States for hydro-meteorological application. Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C. 2015, 10.1016/j.pce.2015.06.002.
72. Zhuo L., Han D., Dai Q., Islam T., Srivastava P.K. Appraisal of NLDAS-2 multi-model simulated soil moistures for hydrological modelling. Water Resour. Manage. 2015, 10.1007/s11269-015-1011-1.