A grouped up-and-down method used for efficacy comparison between two different defibrillation waveforms

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 385-391

  Jin, Danian ^a   Wang, Jianjie ^a   Yang, Kecheng ^a   Wang, Kaifa ^a   Quan, Weilun ^b   Herken, Ulrich ^b   Li, Yongqin ^a  

^a THIRD MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b ZOLL Medical Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiac arrest; De fibrillation threshold (DFT); Dose response curve; Grouped up and down; Ventricular fibrillation (VF)

Indexed keywords

BIOPHYSICS;

CARDIAC ARREST; DE-FIBRILLATION THRESHOLD (DFT); DOSE-RESPONSE CURVES; GROUPED UP-AND-DOWN; VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION;

MEDICAL APPLICATIONS;

ACCURACY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFIBRILLATION; DEFIBRILLATOR; DOSE RESPONSE; HEART ARREST; HEART VENTRICLE FIBRILLATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; PIG; PORCINE MODEL; SHOCK; WAVEFORM; ANIMAL; CARDIOVERSION; PROCEDURES; SIGNAL PROCESSING; VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION;

ANIMALS; ELECTRIC COUNTERSHOCK; HEART ARREST; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SWINE; VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION;

EID: 84959355324     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: 15582531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2458976     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. S. S. Chugh et al., "Current burden of sudden cardiac death: Multiple source surveillance versus retrospective death certificate-based review in a large US community," J. Amer. Coll. Cardiol., Vol. 44, pp. 1268-1275, 2004.
2. C. Vaillancourt and I. G. Stiell, "Cardiac arrest care and emergency medical services in Canada," Can. J. Cardiol., Vol. 20, pp. 1081-1090, 2004.
3. J. Berdowski et al., "Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: Systematic review of 67 prospective studies," Resuscitation, Vol. 81, pp. 1479-1487, 2010.
4. P. S. Chen et al., "Mechanism of cardiac defibrillation: A different point of view," Circulation, Vol. 84, pp. 913-909, 1991.
5. D. J. Dosdall et al., "Mechanisms of defibrillation," Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., Vol. 12, pp. 233-258, 2010.
6. S. L. Higgins et al., "A comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for external defibrillation," Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 4, pp. 305-313, 2000.
7. C. Yin et al., "History, principle and techniques for waveform optimization in external defibrillation," Recent Patents Eng., Vol. 6, pp. 20-30, 2012.
8. M. Yashima et al., "On the mechanism of the probabilistic nature of ventricular defibrillation threshold," Amer. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol., Vol. 284, pp. H249-H255, 2003.
9. D. L. Jones et al., "Defibrillation efficacy comparison of defibrillation threshold versus dose-response curve determination," Circ. Res., Vol. 69, pp. 45-51, 1991.
10. J. M. Davy et al., "The relationship between successful defibrillation and delivered energy in open-chest dogs: Reappraisal of the "defibrillation threshold" concept," Amer. Heart J., Vol. 113, pp. 77-84, 1987.
11. A. T. Compos et al., "An up-down Bayesian, defibrillation efficacy estimator," Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol., Vol. 20, pp. 1292-1300, 1997.
12. R. A. Malkin et al., "A four-shock Bayesian up-down estimator of the 80% effective defibrillation dose," J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol., Vol. 10, pp. 973-980, 1999.
13. G. H. Bardy et al., "Prospective, randomized comparison in humans of a unipolar defibrillation system with that using an additional superior vena cava electrode," Circulation, Vol. 89, pp. 1090-1093, 1994.
14. R. L. Callihan et al., "Comparison of defibrillation probability of success curves for an endocardial lead configuration with and without an inactive epicardial patch," J. Amer. Coll. Cardiol., Vol. 25, pp. 1373-1379, 1995.
15. R. G. Walker et al., "Comparison of six clinically used external defibril-lators in swine," Resuscitation, Vol. 57, pp. 73-83, 2003.
16. J. C. Schuder et al., "Defibrillation in the calf with bidirectional trapezoidal wave shocks applied via chronically implanted epicardial electrodes," Trans. Amer. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs, Vol. 27, pp. 467-470, 1981.
17. B. E. Gliner et al., "The defibrillation success rate versus energy relationship: Part I - Curve fitting and the most efficient defibrillation energy," Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol., Vol. 13, pp. 326-338, 1990.
18. W. J. Dixon, "The up-and-down method for small samples," Amer. Stat. Assoc. J., Vol. 60, pp. 967-978, 1965
19. M. F. Rattes et al., "Defibrillation threshold: A simple and quantitative estimate of the ability to defibrillate," Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol., Vol. 10, pp. 70-77, 1987.
20. W. C. McDaniel and J. C. Schuder, "An up-down algorithm for estimation of the cardiac ventricular defibrillation threshold," Med. Instrum., Vol. 22, pp. 286-292, 1988.
21. Y. Shan et al., "The effects of phase duration on defibrillation success of dual time constant biphasic waveforms," Resuscitation, Vol. 81, pp. 236-241, 2010.
22. G. Ristagno et al., "Comparisonof defibrillation efficacy between two pads placements in a pediatric porcine model of cardiac arrest," Resuscitation, Vol. 83, pp. 755-759, 2012.
23. J. Wang et al., "Comparison of rectilinear biphasic waveform with biphasic truncated exponential waveform in a pediatric defibrillation model," Crit. Care Med., Vol. 35, pp. 1961-1965, 2007.
24. S. Neal et al., "Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two biphasic defibrillator waveforms for the conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm," Amer. J. Cardiol., Vol. 92, pp. 810-814, 2003.
25. F. Alatawi et al., "Prospective, randomized comparison of two biphasic waveforms for the efficacy and safety of transthoracic biphasic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation," Heart Rhythm, Vol. 2, pp. 382-387, 2005.
26. C. D. Deakin et al., "A comparison of rectilinear and truncated exponential biphasic waveforms in elective cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: A prospective randomized controlled trial," Resuscitation, Vol. 84, pp. 286-291, 2013.