A four-shock Bayesian up-down estimator of the 80% effective defibrillation dose

Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Volumn 10, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 973-980

  Malkin, Robert A ^a,b   Herre, John M ^c   McGowen, Lauren ^c   Tenzer, Martha M ^c   Onufer, John R ^c   Stamato, Nicholas J ^c   Wood, Mark ^c   Bernstein, Robert C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

^b University of Memphis   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Defibrillation; Defibrillation threshold; ICD testing; Ventricular fibrillation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFIBRILLATION; DOG; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; HEART VENTRICLE FIBRILLATION; IMPLANTATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL MODEL; SWINE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0032992921     PISSN: 10453873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1999.tb01268.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. 1. Lehmann MH, Steinman RT, Schuger CD, et al: Defibrillation threshold testing and other practices related to AICD implantation: Do all roads lead to Rome? PACE 1989;12(9):1530-1537.
2. 2. Bourland JD, Tacker WA, Geddes LA: Strength-duration curves for trapezoidal waveforms of various tilts for transchest defibrillation in animals. Med Instr 1978;12:38-41.
3. 3. Singer I, Lang D: Defibrillation threshold: Clinical utility and therapeutic implications. PACE 1992;15:932-949.
4. 4. Church T, Martinson M, Kallok M, et al: A model to evaluate alternative methods of defibrillation threshold determination. PACE 1988;11:2002-2007.
5. 5. Winkle RA, Stinson EB, Echt DS, et al: Practical aspects of automatic cardioverter/defibrillator implantation. Am Heart J 1984;108:1335-1346.
6. 6. Ideker RE, Hillsley RE, Wharton JM: Shock strength for the implantable defibrillator: Can you have too much of a good thing? PACE 1992;15:841-844.
7. 7. Geddes LA, Niebauer MJ, Babbs CF, et al: Fundamental criteria underlying the efficacy and safety of defibrillation current waveforms. Med Biol Eng Comput 1985;23:122-130.
8. 8. Cates AW, Wolf PD, Hillsley RE, et al: The probability of defibrillation success and the incidence of postshock arrhythmias as a function of shock strength. PACE 1994;17:1208-1217.
9. 9. Yabe S, Smith WM, Daubert JP, et al: Conduction disturbances caused by high current density electric fields. Circ Res 1990;66:1190-1203.
10. 10. Malkin RA, Pilkington TC, Burdick DS, et al: Estimating the 95% effective defibrillation dose. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1993;40:156-165.
11. 11. Compos AT, Malkin RA, Ideker RE: A Bayesian up-down defibrillation efficacy estimator. PACE 1997;20(5):1292-1300.
12. 12. Box GEP, Tiao GC: Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1973.
13. 13. Davy JM, Fain ES, Dorian P, et al: The relationship between successful defibrillation and delivered energy in open chest dogs: Reappraisal of the "defibrillation threshold" concept. Am Heart J 1987;113:77-84.
14. 14. Li H, Malkin RA: A scalable and shiftable Bayesian defibrillation efficacy estimator. Proc. of IEEE/EMBS, 1997.
15. 15. Malkin RA, Souza JJ, Ideker RE: The ventricular defibrillation and upper limit of vulnerability dose-response curves. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1997;8:895-903.
16. 16. Souza JJ, Malkin RA, Smith WM, et al: Relationship between upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation threshold in a nonthoracotomy pig model. Circulation 1995;91(4):1247-1252.
17. 17. Malkin RA, Idriss SF, Walker RG, et al: The effect of rapid pacing and T wave scanning on the relationship between the defibrillation and upper limit of vulnerability dose-response curves. Circulation 1995;92:1291-1299.
18. 18. Malkin RA, Pilkington TC, Ideker RE: Estimating delibrillation efficacy using combined upper limit of vulnerability testing and defibrillation testing. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1996;43(1):69-78.
19. 19. Nelder JA, Mead R: A simplex method for function minimisation. Comp J 1965;7:308-313.
20. 20. Rattes MF, Sharma AD, Klein GJ, et al: Adrenergic effects on internal cardiac defibrillation threshold. Am J Physiol 1987;22:H500-H506.
21. 21. McDaniel WC, Schuder JC: The cardiac ventricular defibrillation threshold: Inherent limitations in its application and interpretation. Med Instr 1987;21:170-176.
22. 22. Wetherill GB: Sequential estimation of quantal response curves. J Royal Stat Soc 1963;B25:1-48.
23. 23. Babbs CF, Whistler SJ, Yim G: Temporal stability and precision of ventricular defibrillation threshold data. Am J Physiol 1978;235:H553-H55K.
24. 24. Jones DL, Fujimura O, Klein GJ: Minimum replicalions to estimate average threshold energy for defibrillation. Med Inst 1988;22(6):298-303.
25. 25. McNemar Q: Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 1947;12:153-157.
26. 26. Suissa S, Shuster JJ: The 2 × 2 matched-pairs trial: Exact unconditional design and analysis. Biometrics 1991;47(2):361-369.
27. 27. Malkin R: The matched pairs defibrillation efficacy hypothesis test. In Proc. of the IEEE/EMBS Conf., Montreal, Canada, Nov. 1995.
28. 28. McDaniel WC, Schuder JC: An up-down algorithm for estimation of the cardiac ventricular defibrillation threshold. Med Instr 1988;22:286-292.
29. 29. Gliner BE, Murakawa Y, Thakor NV: The defibrillation success rate versus energy relationship: Part I. Curve fitting and the most efficient defibrillation energy. PACE 1990;13:326-338.