Integration of the subsurface and the surface sectors for a more holistic approach for sustainable redevelopment of urban brownfields

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 563-564, Issue , 2016, Pages 879-889

  Norrman, Jenny ^a   Volchko, Yevheniya ^a   Hooimeijer, Fransje ^b   Maring, Linda ^c   Kain, Jaan Henrik ^a   Bardos, Paul ^d   Broekx, Steven ^e   Beames, Alistair ^e   Rosén, Lars ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c DELTARES   (Netherlands)

^d Dept of Soil Science Whiteknights   (United Kingdom)

^e FLEMISH INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH VITO   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Brownfield redevelopment; Remediation; Spatial planning; Subsurface qualities; Sustainability assessment

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; REMEDIATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT; COOPERATIVE LEARNING; INTEGRATED APPROACH; SPATIAL PLANNING; STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT; SUBSURFACE QUALITY; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; URBAN REDEVELOPMENT;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

BROWNFIELD SITE; DECISION MAKING; HOLISTIC APPROACH; PLANNING METHOD; REDEVELOPMENT; SPATIAL PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN AREA; URBAN PLANNING;

ARTICLE; BELGIUM; CASE STUDY; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; HUMAN; NETHERLANDS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWEDEN; URBAN AREA;

BELGIUM; NETHERLANDS; SWEDEN;

EID: 84959228935     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.097     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Ashmore, M., Nathanail, P., Bardos, P., Storey, P., HOMBRE D 6.2 integrated framework for systematic evaluation of brownfield regeneration. [Online] Available at: http://www.zerobrownfields.eu/HombreTrainingGallery/HOMBRE_D6.2_final.pdf, 2014 (Accessed: August 2015).
2. Bardos, R.P., Bakker, L.M.M., Slenders, H.L.A., Nathanail, C.P., Sustainability and remediation. Swartjes, F.A., (eds.) Dealing With Contaminated Sites, 2011, Springer, 889–948.
3. Bartke, S., Schwarze, R., Mercantile value reduction: accounting for stigma on contaminated land in Germany. Proceedings of the 16th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference 2009, Stockholm, 2009.
4. Bartke, S., Schwarze, R., No perfect tools: trade-offs of sustainability principles and user requirements in designing support tools for land-use decisions between greenfields and brownfields. J. Environ. Manag. 153:2015 (2015), 11–24.
5. Beames, A., Broekx, S., Lookman, R., Touchant, K., Seuntjens, P., Sustainability appraisal tools for soil and groundwater remediation: how is the choice of remediation alternative influenced by different sets of sustainability indicators and tool structures?. Sci. Total Environ. 470-471:2014 (2014), 954–966.
6. Beumer, V., Bardos, P., Menger, P., HOMBRE D 5.2: decision support system on soft reuses. [Online] Available at: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paul_Bardos/publication/268815610_Decision_support_system_on_soft_reuses/links/54786d9b0cf205d1687de470.pdf, 2014 (Accessed: August 2015).
7. Bleicher, A., Gross, M., Sustainability assessment and the revitalization of contaminated sites: operationalizing sustainable development for local problems. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 17:2010 (2010), 57–66.
8. Brabers, L., Project biodiversiteitstoets: Wetenschappelijk rapport. Vrienden van HeverleeBos en Meerdaalwoud. [Online] Available on: http://www.biodiversiteitstoets.be/data/documenten/Begeleidende%20tekst%20bij%20biodiversiteitstoets.pdf, 2014 (In Dutch, accessed: August 2015).
9. Brinkhoff, P., Multi-criteria analysis for assessing sustainability of remedial actions — applications in contaminated land development. A Literature Review. Report 2011:14, 2011, Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gothenburg, Sweden.
10. Broekx, S., Liekens, I., Peelaerts, W., De Nocker, L., Landuyt, D., Staes, J., Meire, P., Schaafsma, M., Van Reeth, W., Van den Kerckhove, O., Cerulus, T., A web application to support the quantification and valuation of ecosystem services. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 40 (2013), 65–74.
11. Busink, R., Schouten, D., Evaluatie Startprojecten I/II/III. Cabernet website (undated). Definition of brownfields. [Online] Available at: http://www.cabernet.org.uk/?c=1134, 2006 (Accessed: August 2015).
12. CABERNET, Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: CABERNET Network Report. 2006, Land Quality Management Group (LQMG), University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK 0-9547474-5-3 (Available at: http://www.cabernet.org.uk/resourcefs/427.pdf. (Accessed: September 2015)).
13. Chakrapani, C., Hernandez, T., Brownfield Redevelopment and the Triple Bottom Line Approach. 2012, Ryerson University, Centre for the Study of Commercial Activity, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ([Online] Available at: http://www.mah.gov.on.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?did=9658 (Accessed: April 29, 2014)).
14. Christensen, F.K., Understanding value changes in the urban development process and the impact of municipal planning. Land Use Policy 36:2014 (2014), 113–121.
15. Crosby, B.L., Stakeholder Analysis: A Vital Tool for Strategic Managers. Technical Notes. A publication of USAID's Implementing Policy Change Project 2 (March 1991), 1991, USAID ([Online] Available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnabr482.pdf (Accessed: March 28, 2003)).
16. Cundy, A.B., Bardos, R.P., Church, A., Puschenreiter, M., Friesl-Hanl, W., Müller, I., Neu, S., Mench, M., Witters, N., Vangronsveld, J., Developing principles of sustainability and stakeholder engagement for “gentle” remediation approaches: the European context. J. Environ. Manag. 129 (2013), 283–291.
17. Davison, G., Legacy, C., Positive planning and sustainable brownfield regeneration: the role and potential of Government land development agencies. Int. Plan. Stud. 19:2 (2014), 154–172.
18. Dugernier, M., De Nocker, L., Broekx, S., Bosmans, D., Analyse van de financiële gevolgen van ruimtelijke beslissingen: kader en beschrijving van enkele situaties. Studie uitgevoerd in opdracht van Ruimte Vlaanderen. [Online] Available at: http://www.ruimtelijkeordening.be/NL/Diensten/Onderzoek/Studies/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/8833/Analyse-van-de-financiele-gevolgen-van-ruimtelijke-beslissingen-kader-en-beschrijving-van-enkele-situaties, 2014 (Accessed: August 2015).
19. Edwards, D., Pahlen, G., Bertram, C., Nathanail, P., Best practice guidance for sustainable brownfield regeneration, the RESCUE manual. [Online] Available at: http://areale.ch/brache/images/links_infothek_PDF/12-RESCUE_Manual.pdf, 2005 (Accessed: August 2015).
20. Ferber, U., Grimski, D., Millar, K., Nathanail, P., Cabernet final report. 2006, University of Nottingham, UK ([Online] Available at: http://www.cabernet.org.uk/resourcefs/427.pdf (Accessed: August 2015)).
21. Flyvbjerg, B., Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual. Inq. 12:2 (2006), 219–245 (April).
22. Friend, J., Hickling, A., Planning Under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach. third ed, 2005, Elsevier Architectural Press, Oxford.
23. Garção, R., Assessment of Alternatives of Urban Brownfield Redevelopment - Application of the SCORE Tool in Early Planning Stages. Master's thesis 2015:15, 2015, Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gothenburg, Sweden ( http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/219167/219167.pdf).
24. Griffioen, J., van Wensem, J., Oomes, J.L.M., Barends, F., Breunese, J., Bruining, H., Olsthoorn, T., Stams, A.J.M., van der Stoel, A.E.C., A technical investigation on tools and concepts for sustainable management of the subsurface in The Netherlands. Sci. Total Environ. 485-486 (2014), 810–819.
25. Hartmuth, G., Huber, K., Rink, D., Operationalization and contextualization of sustainability at the local level. Sustain. Dev. 16:4 (2008), 261–270.
26. Hermans, L.M., Actor Analysis for Water Resources Management. Putting the Promise Into Practice. PhD thesis, 2005, Eburon Publishers, Delft, The Netherlands.
27. HOMBRE, Decision Support Framework for the Successful Regeneration of Brownfields. 2013, Deltares (Avaialble at: http://www.zerobrownfields.eu/HombreTrainingGallery/HomePage/HOMBRE_D3.1_final_DecisionSupportFramework.pdf. (Accessed: September 2015)).
28. Hooimeijer, F.L., The Tradition of Making: Polder Cities. PhD thesis, 2011, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
29. Hooimeijer, F.L., Maring, L., System exploration environment and subsurface (SEES). [Online] Available at: https://publicwiki.deltares.nl/display/SEES/HOME+English, 2012 (Accessed: August 2015).
30. Hooimeijer, F.L., Maring, L., Ontwerpen met de Ondergrond. Stedebouw en Ruimtelijke Ordening, 6, 2013, 52–56 ([Online] Available at: http://repository.tudelft.nl/view/ir/uuid:e6f9cbe9-8cc5-4a2e-b706-d32224db2191/ (In Dutch) (Accessed: August 2015)).
31. Hooimeijer, F.L., Maring, L., BALANCE 4P: balancing decisions for urban brownfield regeneration — people, planet, profit and processes. Advies voor Merwevierhavens. Report for the SNOWMAN Network, 2014 ([Online] Available at: http://soilpedia.nl/Bikiwiki%20documenten/Snowman/BALANCE%204P/A4-10%20Advies_Rdam_final.pdf (In Dutch) (Accessed: August 2015)).
32. ISO, ISO Guide 73:2009 (en). Risk Management — Vocabulary. 3.2.1.1 Stakeholder. [Online] Available at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:guide:73:ed-1:v1:en, 2009 (Accessed: August 2015).
33. ISO, ISO/DIS 18504. Soil Quality — Guidance on Sustainable Remediation. [Online] Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=62688, 2015 (Accessed, February 2016).
34. Ivarsson, M., Mapping of eco-system services in the Fixfabriken area. Method development and case study application. The Balance 4P Project of the SNOWMAN Network Coordinated Call IV. Report 2015:6, 2015, Enveco, Stockholm, Sweden [Online] Available at: http://www.enveco.se/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Enveco-rapport-2015-6_Balance4P.pdf (Accessed February 2016).
35. Keeney, R., Decision analysis: an overview. Oper. Res. 30:5 (1982), 803–838.
36. Kok, S., A guide through the forest of sustainable urban redevelopment instruments. Student Internship Report VU Amsterdam, 2014, Deltares, the Netherlands.
37. Lackin, J., Stuurman, R., Bleeker, R., Onverwachte gebeurtenissen in de bodem - Gevolgen van ons handelen in beeld. TCB report TCB R23 (2014), the Netherlands. [Online] Available at: http://www.tcbodem.nl/publicaties/waterbeheer/534-r23-2014-rapport-onverwachte-gebeurtenissen-in-de-bodem-gevolgen-van-ons-handelen-in-beeld/file, 2014 (Accessed: August 2015).
38. Lamé, F., Maring, L., Into Dutch Soils. 2014, Rijkswaterstaat, The Netherlands.
39. Maring, L., Blauw, M., van den Bergh, R., Ellen, G., van Oostrom, N., Limasset, E., Ferber, U., Menger, P., Smit, M., Wendler, K., Neonato, F., Irminski, W., Nathanail, P., Garcia, R.B., Hombre D3.1: decision support framework for the successful regeneration of brownfields. (Appendix B). [Online] Available at: http://www.zerobrownfields.eu/HombreTrainingGallery/HomePage/HOMBRE_D3.1_final_DecisionSupportFramework.pdf, 2013 (Accessed: August 2015).
40. Maring, L., Blauw, M., Martens, J., de Vette, K., Asset management van de ondergrond. Bodem bodem, 2, 2015, 28–29 ([Online] Available at: https://www.deltares.nl/app/uploads/2015/07/Asset-management-van-de-ondergrond.pdf (Accessed: August 2015), April).
41. Nadin, V., Stead, D., European spatial planning systems, social models and learning. disP 44:172 (2008), 35–47.
42. Nilsson, K.L., Rydén, L., Spatial planning and management. Rydén, Lars, Karlsson, Ingrid, (eds.) Rural Development and Land Use, 2012, The Baltic University Programme, Uppsala, Sweden.
43. Norrman, J., Volchko, Y., Maring, L., Hooimeijer, F., Broekx, S., Garção, R., Kain, J.-H., Ivarsson, M., Touchant, K., Beames, A., Balance 4P: Balancing Decisions for Urban Brownfield Regeneration – Technical Report. Report 2015:11. 2015, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden ([Online] Available at: http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/231843/local_231843.pdf (Accessed February 2016)).
44. Norrman, J., Maring, L., Hooimeijer, F., Broekx, S., Garção, R., Volchko, Y., Kain, J.-H., Ivarsson, M., Touchant, K., Beames, A., Balance 4P: Balancing decisions for urban brownfield regeneration – case studies. Case Study Report of the BALANCE 4P Project of the SNOWMAN Network Coordinated Call IV. Report 2015:12, 2015, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden [Online] Available at: http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/231844/local_231844.pdf (Accessed February 2016).
45. NV, Guideline Values for Contaminated Land: Model Description and a Guide (Trans.) Riktvärden för förorenad mark: Modellbeskrivning och vägledning, 2009, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm (In Swedish, Rapport 5976).
46. OECD, CDRF, Trends in Urbanisation and Urban Policies in OECD Countries: What Lessons for China?. 2010, OECD Publishing, Paris ([Online] Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264092259-en. (Accessed April 2015)).
47. OVAM, Code van goede praktijk BATNEEC-afweging van bodemsaneringsprojecten met CO2-calculator. Availabe online at http://www.ovam.be/batneec-evaluatie-met-co2-calculator, 2013 (Accessed August 2015).
48. Pediaditi, K., Doick, K.J., Moffat, A.J., Monitoring and evaluation practice for brownfield, regeneration to greenspace initiatives: a meta-evaluation of assessment and monitoring tools. Landsc. Urban Plan. 97:1 (2010), 22–36.
49. Postma, S., Zet bodeminformatie op kaart, maar wees zelf de legenda’: bodeminformatie geeft inzicht in duurzaam gebruik ondergrond. Bodem 21:3 (2011), 12–13.
50. RESCUE, Best Practice Guidance for Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration. 2005, Land Quality Press, A Division of Land Quality Management Ltd. 0-9547474-0-2 (Available at: http://areale.ch/brache/images/links_infothek_PDF/12-RESCUE_Manual.pdf. Accessed September 2015, May).
51. REVIT, Working towards more effective and sustainable brownfield revitalisation policies. Ensuring sustainability in brownfield revitalisation. Available at: http://areale.ch/brache/images/links_infothek_PDF/20-REVIT_Sustainability.pdf, 2007 (Accessed August 2015).
52. Rizzo, E., Pesce, M., Pizzol, L., Alexandrescu, F.M., Giubilato, E., Critto, A., Marcomini, A., Bartke, S., Brownfield regeneration in Europe: identifying stakeholder perceptions, concerns, attitudes and information needs. Land Use Policy 48 (2015), 437–453.
53. Rosén, L., Back, P.-E., Söderqvist, T., Norrman, J., Brinkhoff, P., Norberg, T., Volchko, Y., Norin, M., Bergknut, M., Döberl, G., 2015. SCORE: a novel multi-criteria decision analysis approach for assessing the sustainability of contaminated land remediation. Sci. Total Environ. 511 (2015), 621–638.
54. Schädler, S., Morio, M., Bartke, S., Rohr-Zänker, R., Finkel, M., Designing sustainable and economically attractive brownfield revitalization options using an integrated assessment model. J. Environ. Manag. 92:3 (2011), 827–837.
55. Söderqvist, T., Brinkhoff, P., Norberg, T., Rosén, L., Back, P.-E., Norrman, J., Cost-benefit analysis as a part of sustainability assessment of remediation alternatives for contaminated land. J. Environ. Manag. 157:2015 (2015), 267–278.
56. Göteborgs Stad, [SKA] Social konsekvensanalys. Människor i fokus 1.0. Göteborgs Stad. Stadsbyggnadskontoret. Gothenburg, Sweden. [Online] Available at: https://goteborg.se/wps/wcm/connect/7a225b9b-821e-435d-80ba-f3fba09fd443/OPA_SKA.pdf?MOD=AJPERES, 2015 (Accessed: August 2015).
57. SuRF-UK, A framework for assessing the sustainability of soil and groundwater remediation. 2010, Contaminated Land: Applications in Real Environments (CL:AIRE), London ( http://www.claire.co.uk/index.php?option=com_phocadownload&view=file&id=61:initiatives&Itemid=78, accessed 31 May 2013).
58. Tummers, L.C., Hooimeijer, F.L., Maring, L., Poldering Between Control and Laissez Faire: The Example of Harmonizing Subsoil Management and Spatial Planning. 2014, TU Delft ([Online] Available at: http://repository.tudelft.nl/view/ir/uuid%3Ae332777d-261b-4186-a8b9-ac00a224b7ee/ (Accessed: August 2015)).
59. UFZ, (eds.) The Megasite Management Guideline, 2013 ([Online] Available at: http://www.ufz.de/mmt-guideline-en/epaper/epaper.pdf (Accessed: August 2015)).
60. UN (United Nations), Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, South Africa. 2002, United Nations, New York, United States of America.
61. Van Dorst, M.J., Duijvestein, C.A.J., Concepts of Sustainable Development – The 2004 International Sustainable Development research conference – Conference Proceedings 29–30 March. 2004, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
62. Van Gaans, P., Ellen, G.J., HOMBRE D 2.3: successful brownfield regeneration. [Online] Available at: http://www.zerobrownfields.eu/HombreTrainingGallery/HOMBRE_D2.3_final.pdf, 2014 (Accessed: August 2015).
63. Verburg, J., Dams, J., The Decision Model Spatial Planning Rotterdam (Trans.) Het Besluitvormingsmodel Ruimtelijke Plannen Rotterdam, 2004, OBR and dS + V, Rotterdam.
64. VROM, Travel guide for entrepreneurs in area development. In Dutch: Reiswijzer Gebiedsontwikkeling, 2011, VROM, Den Haag ([Online] Available at: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2011/04/01/reiswijzer-gebiedsontwikkeling-2011. Accessed: September 2015).
65. WCED, Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future., 1987 ([Online] Available at: http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf).