A technical investigation on tools and concepts for sustainable management of the subsurface in The Netherlands

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 485-486, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 810-819

  Griffioen, Jasper ^a,b,c   van Wensem, Joke ^d   Oomes, Justine L M ^d,i   Barends, Frans ^a   Breunese, Jaap ^c   Bruining, Hans ^e   Olsthoorn, Theo ^f   Stams, Alfons J M ^g   van der Stoel, Almer E C ^h  

^a DELTARES   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c TNO   (Netherlands)

^d Soil Protection Technical Committee (TCB)   (Netherlands)

^e DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^f Waternet   (Netherlands)

^g WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^h Geotechnical Consultant CRUX Eng   (Netherlands)

ⁱ Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Case study; Legal principles; Risk analysis; Sustainability assessment

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; RESEARCH; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATIONS; GEOTHERMAL EXPLOITATION; LEGAL PRINCIPLES; PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE; SITE INVESTIGATIONS; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT; UNDERGROUND GARAGES;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; LEGISLATION; POLICY ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ARTICLE; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPLOITATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; ETHICS; LAW; NETHERLANDS; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; RESPONSIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL ASPECT; UNCERTAINTY;

NETHERLANDS;

CASE STUDY; LEGAL PRINCIPLES; RISK ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; NETHERLANDS; WATER POLLUTION;

EID: 84900535543     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.114     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Axelsson G. Sustainable geothermal utilization - case histories; definitions; research issues and modelling. Geothermics 2010, 39:283-291.
2. Barends F. Introduction to soft soil geotechnique. Content, context and application 2011, IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, [354 pp.].
3. Bonte M., Stuyfzand P.J., Hulsmann A., Van Beleen P. Underground thermal energy storage: environmental risks and policy developments in The Netherlands and European Union. Ecol Soc 2011, 16(1):22.
4. Dalgleish F., Cooper B.J. Risk management: developing a framework for a water authority. Manag Environ Qual 2005, 16:235-249.
5. De Gans W. Quaternary. Geology of The Netherlands 2007, 173-195. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. T. Wong, D.A.J. Batjes, J. de Jager (Eds.).
6. De Mulder E.F.J., Geluk M.C., Ritsema I., Westerhoff W.E., Wong T.E. The subsurface of The Netherlands 2003, TNO Netherlands Institute of Applied Geosciences/Wolters Noordhoff, [379 pp. (in Dutch)].
7. De Mulder E.F.J., Hack H.R.G.K., Van Ree C.C.D.F. Sustainable development and management of the subsurface 2012, The Geol. Soc., London, U.K., [211 pp.].
8. De Waal J.A., Roest J.P.A., Fokker P.A., Kroon I.C., Breunese J.N., Muntendam-Bos A.G., et al. The effective subsidence capacity concept: how to assure that subsidence in the Wadden Sea remains within defined limits?. Neth J Geosci 2012, 91:385-399.
9. Dooley G., Leddin A. Perspectives on mineral policy in Ireland. Resour Policy 2005, 30:194-202.
10. ECS European Committee for Standardisation, CEN Eurocode 7, prEN 1997-1:2004(E), Sections 2.7 and 9.4 2004.
11. Eftekhari A.A., Bruining H., Van der Kooi H.J. Exergy analysis of underground coal gasification with simultaneous storage of carbon dioxide. Energy 2012, 45:729-745.
12. Evans D., Stephenson M., Shaw R. The present and future use of 'land' below ground. Land Use Policy 2009, 265:S302-S316.
13. Gleeson T., Alley W.M., Allen D.M., Sophocleous M.A., Zhou Y., Taniguchi M., et al. Towards sustainable groundwater use: setting long-term goals, backcasting, and managing adaptively. Ground Water 2012, 50:19-26.
14. Hahnlein S., Bayer P., Ferguson G., Blum P. Sustainability and policy for the thermal use of shallow geothermal energy. Energy Policy 2013, 59:914-925.
15. Hamor T. Sustainable mining in the European Union: the legislative aspect. Environ Manag 2004, 33:252-261.
16. IVAM research, consultancy on sustainability Duurzame stedelijke gebiedsontwikkeling 2010, UvA, [http://www.ivam.uva.nl/index.php?id=51].
17. Jenkins H., Yakovleva N. Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. J Clean Prod 2006, 14:271-284.
18. Khadam I.M., Kaluarachchi Multi-criteria decision analysis with probabilistic risk assessment for the management of contaminated groundwater. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2003, 23:683-721.
19. Margat J., Van der Gun J. Groundwater around the world. A geographic synopsis 2013, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, London, [348 pp.].
20. Mittelslet A.R., Smolen M.D., Fox G.A., Adams D.C. Comparison of aquifer sustainability under groundwater administrations in Oklahoma and Texas. J Am Water Resour Assoc 2011, 47:424-431.
21. Miyazaki B. Well integrity: an overlooked source of risk and liability for underground natural gas storage. Lessons learned from incidents in the USA. The Geol. Soc., Spec. Publ. 2013, 313:163-172. D.J. Evans, R.A. Chadwick (Eds.).
22. Ness B., Anderberg S., Olsson L. Structuring problems in sustainability science: the multi-level DPSIR framework. Geoforum 2010, 41:479-488.
23. Nikolaou I.E., Evangelinos K.I. A SWOT analysis of environmental management practices in Greek Mining and Mineral Industry. Resour Policy 2010, 35:226-234.
24. Nyvlt O., Privara S., Ferkl L. Probabilistic risk assessment of highway tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2011, 26:71-82.
25. O'Regan B., Moles R. Using system dynamics to model the interaction between environmental and economic factors in the mining industry. J Clean Prod 2006, 14:689-707.
26. Pahl-Wostl C., Newig J., Ridder D. Linking public participation to adaptive management. Groundwater science and policy. An international overview 2008, 150-173. RSC Publishing, Cambridge, U.K. P. Quevauviller (Ed.).
27. Paleologos E.K. The lost value of groundwater and its influence on environmental decision making. Risk Anal 2008, 28:939-950.
28. Pandey V.P., Shrestha S., Chapagain S.J., Kazama F. A framework for measuring groundwater sustainability. Environ Sci Policy 2011, 14:396-407.
29. Prior T., Giurco D., Mudd G., Mason L., Behrisch J. Resource depletion, peak minerals and the implications for sustainable resource management. Global Environ Change 2012, 22:577-587.
30. Quevauviller P. Integrated management principles for groundwater in the WFD context. Groundwater science and policy. An international overview 2008, 473-493. RSC Publishing, Cambridge, U.K. P. Quevauviller (Ed.).
31. Rinaudo J.D., Strosser P. Groundwater management and planning: how can economics help?. Groundwater science and policy. An international overview 2008, 58-81. RSC Publishing, Cambridge, U.K. P. Quevauviller (Ed.).
32. Savenije H.H.G., Van der Zaag P. Integrated water resources management: concepts and issues. Phys Chem Earth 2008, 33:290-297.
33. Schmandt J. Bringing sustainability science to water basin management. Energy 2006, 31:2350-2360.
34. Sophocleous M. The evolution of groundwater management paradigms in Kansas and possible new steps towards water sustainability. J Hydrol 2012, 414-415:550-559.
35. TCB Duurzaam gebruik van de ondergrond. Gereedschap voor structuur en visie. Rapport werkgroep DGO in opdracht van Technische commissie bodem 2012, TCB R22 Den Haag.
36. Tscherning K., Helming K., Krippner B., Sieber S., Gomez y Paloma S. Does research applying the DPSIR framework support decision making. Land Use Policy 2012, 29:102-110.
37. Tidwell V.C., Van den Brink C. Cooperative modeling: linking science, communication and groundwater planning. Groundwater 2008, 46:174-182.
38. Tiess G. Minerals policy in Europe: some recent developments. Resour Policy 2010, 35:190-198.
39. Twarakavi N.K.C., Kaluarachchi J.J. Sustainability of groundwater quality considering land use changes and public health risks. J Environ Manag 2006, 81:405-419.
40. UNESCO Water ethics and water management 2011, UNESCO, Bangkok, Thailand, [76 pp.].
41. Vanden Brink C., Frapporti G., Griffioen J., Zaadnoordijk W.J. Statistical analysis of anthropogenic versus geochemical-controlled differences in groundwater composition in The Netherlands. J Hydrol 2007, 336:470-480.
42. Van der Meulen M.J. Sustainable mineral development: possibilities and pitfalls illustrated by the rise and fall of Dutch mineral planning guidance. Geol. Soc, London, Spec. Publ. 2005, 250:225-232. B.R. Marker, M.G. Petterson, F. McEvoy, M.H. Stephenson (Eds.).
43. Van Thienen-Visser K., Hendriks D., Marsman A., Nepveu M., Groenenberg R., Wildenborg T., et al. Bow-tie risk assessment combining causes and effects applied to gas oil storage in an abandoned salt cavern. Eng Geol 2014, 168:149-166.
44. Van Wezel A.P., Franken R.O.G., Drissen E., Versluijs K.C.W., Vanden Berg R. Societal cost-benefit analysis for soil remediation in The Netherlands. Integrated Environ. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2008, 4:61-74.
45. Voulvoulis N., Skolout J.W.F., Oates C.J., Plant J.A. From chemical risk assessment to environmental resources management: the challenge for mining. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2013, 30:7815-7826.
46. VROM Rijksvisie op het duurzaam gebruik van de ondergrond, Den Haag. Annex accompanying House Minutes 32123-XI no. 67 2010.
47. Winter G., Jans J.H., Macrory R., Kramer L. Weighing up the EC Environmental Liability Directive. J Environ Law 2008, 20:163-191.
48. Yates D., Purkey D., Sieber J., Huber-Lee A., Galbraith H. WEAP 21 - a demand-, priority- and preference-driven water planning model. Part 2. Aiding freshwater ecosystem service evaluation. Water Int 2005, 30:501-512.
49. Zellner M.L., Reeves H.W. Examining the contradiction in 'sustainable urban growth': an example of groundwater sustainability. J Environ Plan Manag 2012, 55:545-562.