Monitoring and evaluation practice for brownfield, regeneration to greenspace initiatives. A meta-evaluation of assessment and monitoring tools.

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 97, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 22-36

  Pediaditi, Kalliope ^a   Doick, Kieron J ^b   Moffat, Andrew J ^b  

^a MEDITERRANEAN AGRONOMIC INSTITUTE OF CHANIA   (Greece)

^b FOREST RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Brownfield greening; Evaluation criteria; Greenspace management; Impact assessment; Sustainability objective; User focus

Indexed keywords

LIFE CYCLE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

BROWNFIELD GREENINGS; EVALUATION CRITERIA; GREENSPACE MANAGEMENTS; IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; SUSTAINABILITY OBJECTIVES; USER FOCUS;

PETROLEUM RESERVOIR EVALUATION;

BROWNFIELD SITE; EUROPEAN UNION; GREENSPACE; LIFE CYCLE; META-ANALYSIS; REGENERATION; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 84866540299     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Bardos R.P., Kearney T.E., Nathanail C.P., Weenk A., Martin I.D. Assessing the wider environmental value of remediating land contamination. Proc. 7th International FZK/TNO Conference on Contaminated Soil " ConSoil" 2000, 99-106. Thomas Telford Ltd., London.
2. Bell S., Morse S. Sustainability Indicators, Measuring the Immeasurable 1999, Earthscan, London.
3. Bell S., Morse S. Measuring Sustainability: Learning From Doing 2003, Earthscan, London.
4. Bradshaw A.D., Chadwick M.J. The Restoration of Land 1980, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
5. Building Research Establishment, 2004. BRE Subcontract: Assessment of Sustainability Tools. Report number 15961. BRE, Glasgow. http://download.sue-mot.org/envtooleval.pdf.
6. Burger J.A. Environmental management: integrating ecological evaluation, remediation, restoration, natural resource damage assessment and long-term stewardship on contaminated lands. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 400(1-3):6-19.
7. CABE (Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment), 2009. Grey to Green: How We Shift Funding and Skills to Green Our Cities. CABE, London. http://www.cabe.org.uk/publications/grey-to-green.
8. Carsjens G.A., Ligtenberg A. A GIS-based support tool for sustainable spatial planning in metropolitan areas. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 80(1-2):72-83.
9. Chess C. Evaluating environmental public participation: methodological questions. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2000, 43(6):769-784.
10. Choumert J., Salanie J. Provision of urban green spaces: some insights from economics. Landsc. Res. 2008, 33(3):331-345.
11. Council of the European Union, 2006. Review of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy (EU SDS)-Renewed Strategy, 10117/06. http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/06/st10/st10117.en06.pdf.
12. Curwell S., Deakin M. Editorial, sustainable urban development and bequest. Build. Res. Inf. 2002, 30(2):79-82.
13. De Sousa C.A. Policy performance and brownfield redevelopment in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Prof. Geogr. 2005, 57(2):312-327.
14. Delbecq A.L., Van de Ven A.H. A group process model for problem identification and program planning. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 1971, 7:466-491.
15. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2005. Securing the Future-UK Government Sustainable Development Strategy: The UK Government Sustainable Development Strategy (Cm. 6467). The Stationery Office, London.
16. Doick K.J., Pediaditi K., Moffat A.J., Hutchings T.R. Defining the sustainability objectives of brownfield regeneration to greenspace. Int. J. Manage. Decision Making 2009, 10(3/4):282-302.
17. Environment Council, 2002. Dialogue for Sustainability: Facilitation Skills and Principles. Environmental Council C1/V1, London.
18. Ford D. Tall, Grande or Venti Models?. J. Water Res. Plann. Manag. 2006, 132(1):1-3.
19. Fuller R.A., Gaston K.J. The scaling of green space coverage in European cities. Biol. Lett. 2009, 5:352-355.
20. Glasson J. Life after the decision: the importance of monitoring in EIA. Built Environ. 1994, 20(4):309-320.
21. Haigh M.J. Problems in the reclamation of coal-mine disturbed lands in Wales. Int. J. Mining Reclamat. Environ. 1992, 6:31-37.
22. Hak T., Moldan B., Dahl A. Sustainability Indicators: A Scientific Assessment 2007, Island Press, Washington, DC.
23. Häkkinen, T., 2001. Crisp construction city-related sustainability indicators state-of-the-art. From http://crisp.cstb.fr/PDF/reports/stateofartmaaliskuu.pdf.
24. Sustainable Development Principles in Practice 1997, The International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg. P. Hardi, T. Zdan (Eds.).
25. Hardisty P.E., Ozdemiroglu E., Arch S. Sustainable remediation: including external costs of remediation. Land Contam. Reclamat. 2008, 16(4):307-317.
26. Harris M., Herbert S., Smith M. Remedial treatment for contaminated land. Classification and selection of remedial methods. VI, SP104 1995, CIRIA, London.
27. Heckathorn D.D. Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc. Probl. 1997, 44:174-199.
28. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2006. Compendium: a global directory to indicator initiatives. http://www.iisd.org/measure/compendium/about.asp.
29. Land Use Consultants, 1989. Cost Effective Management of Reclaimed Derelict Sites. HMSO, London.
30. Land Use Consultants, 2004. Making the Links: Green Space and Quality of Life. Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh.
31. Maclaren V.W. Urban sustainable reporting. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 1996, 62(2):184-202.
32. Moffat A.J., Hutchings T.R. Greening brownfield land. Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: Liveable Places From Problem Spaces 2007, 143-176. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. T. Dixon, M. Raco, P. Catney, D.N. Lerner (Eds.).
33. Methods of Environmental Impacts Assessment 2001, UCL, London. 2nd ed. P. Morris, R. Therivel (Eds.).
34. ODPM, 2002. Planning Policy Guidance 17: Planning for Open Space, Sport and Recreation. ODPM, London.
35. Patton M.Q. Utilization-focused Evaluation: The New Century Text 1997, Thousand Oaks/Sage, London. third ed.
36. Pediaditi K., Wehrmeyer W., Burningham K. Evaluating the sustainability of brownfield redevelopment projects. Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: Liveable Places From Problem Spaces 2007, 315-351. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. T. Dixon, M. Raco, P. Catney, D.N. Lerner (Eds.).
37. Peramaki M.P., Donovan P.B. Remedial goal driven, media-specific method for conducting a cost benefit analysis of multiple remedial approaches. Proceedings NGWA Conference on Remediation: site closure and the total cost of clean up 2003, 18-19.
38. PETUS, 2007. Practical evaluation tools for urban sustainability. http://www.petus.eu.com/.
39. Pintér L., Hardi P., Bartelmus P. Sustainable Development Indicators: Proposals for a way Forward, Prepared for the UN-DSD 2005, IISD, Winnepeg.
40. Posavac E.J., Carey R.G. Program Evaluation, methods and case studies 2007, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey. 7th ed.
41. Ramos T.B., Caeiro S., de Melo J.J. Environmental indicator frameworks to design and assess environmental monitoring programs. Impact Assess. Project Appraisal 2004, 22:47-62.
42. Rescue Consortium, 2005. Manual: Best Practice guidance for sustainable brownfield regeneration. http://www.rescue-europe.com/download/reports/RESCUE%20Manual.pdf.
43. Scaling Issues in Integrated Assessment 2003, Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse, Netherlands. J. Rotmans, D.S. Rothman (Eds.).
44. Rudland D., Jackson S. Selection of remedial treatments for contaminated land. A Guide to Good Practice, CIRIA C622 2004, CIRIA, London.
45. Ruiz-Jaen M.C., Aide T.M. Restoration success: how is it being measured?. Restor. Ecol. 2005, 13:569-577.
46. Ruiz-Jaen M.C., Aide T.M. An integrated approach for measuring urban forest restoration success. Urban Forestry Urban Green. 2006, 4:55-68.
47. Sarantakos S. Social Research 1993, MacMillan Education Australia, PTY, Ltd.
48. Schnelle, E., 1979. The metaplan-method: Communication tools for planning and learning groups. Metaplan Series No. 7, Quickborn GmbH, Hamburg.
49. Scriven, M.S., 1991. An introduction to meta-evaluation. Educational products report 2. In: Scriven, M.S. (Ed.), Evaluation Thesaurus (4th ed.). Sage, London, pp. 36-38.
50. Sellers G., Moffat A.J., Hutchings T.R. Learning from experience: creating sustainable urban greenspaces from brownfield sites. Brownfields III. Prevention, Assessment, Rehabilitation and Development of Brownfield Sites 2006, 163-172. WIT Press, Southampton. C.A. Brebbia, U. Mander (Eds.).
51. Sheate W.R. Conference report, workshop on linking impact assessment and management tools. J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manage. 2002, 4(4):465-474.
52. Sipilä M., Tyrväinen L. Evaluation of collaborative urban forest planning in Helsinki, Finland. Urban Forestry Urban Green. 2005, 4(1):1-12.
53. Stubbs M. Natural green space and planning policy: devising a model for its delivery in regional spatial strategies. Landsc. Res. 2008, 33(1):119-139.
54. Stufflebeam D.L., Shinkfield A.J. Evaluation Theory, Models & Applications 2007, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
55. Syms P. Land, Development and Design 2002, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
56. Tarzia, V. (ed.), 2003. European common indicators. Towards a local sustainability profile. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/urban/pdf/eci_final_report.pdf.
57. Treweek J. Ecological Impact Assessment 1999, Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford.
58. Tyrväinen L., Mäkinen K., Schipperijn J. Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 79(1):5-19.
59. Ukaga O., Maser C. Evaluating Sustainable Development: Giving People a Voice in their Destiny 2004, Stylus Publishing, Virginia.
60. UN Millennium Project, 2005. Investing in development. A Practical Plan to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. Earthscan, New York. http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/documents/MainReportComplete-lowres.pdf.
61. UNCED, 1993. Report of the United Nations conference on environment and development. Rio de Janeiro. United Nations, New York, 3-14 June, 1992.
62. UNDESA, 2007. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Sustainable Development. Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies, 3rd ed. United Nations, New York.
63. Vik E., Bardos P., Brogan J., Edwards D., Gondi F., Henrysson T., et al. Towards a framework for selecting remediation technologies for contaminated sites. Land Contam. Reclam. 2001, 9(1):119-127.
64. Villella J., Sellers G., Moffat A.J., Hutchings T.R. From contaminated site to premier urban greenspace: investigating the success of Thames Barrier Park, London. Brownfields III. Prevention, Assessment, Rehabilitation and Development of Brownfield Sites 2006, 153-162. WIT Press, Southampton. C.A. Brebbia, U. Mander (Eds.).
65. Wedding G.C., Crawford-Brown D. Measuring site-level success in brownfield redevelopments: a focus on sustainability and green building. J. Environ. Manage. 2007, 85:483-495.
66. Wehrmeyer W. A guide to communicating contaminated land risk. Land Contam. Reclamat. 2001, 9(1):21-28.