Methodologies for realizing the potential of health impact assessment

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 382-389

  Cole, Brian L ^a   Shimkhada, Riti ^a   Fielding, Jonathan E ^a   Kominski, Gerald ^a   Morgenstern, Hal ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH STATUS; POPULATION RESEARCH; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; THEORETICAL STUDY; UNITED STATES; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 17144431760     PISSN: 07493797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.01.010     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. World Bank Health aspects of environmental impact assessment. Environmental assessment sourcebook update 18 1997 World Bank Washington DC
2. World Health Organization Health impact assessment: main concepts and suggested approach. Gothenburg consensus paper 1999 WHO Regional Office for Europe www.euro.who.int/document/PAE/Gothenburgpaper.pdf Accessed March 16, 2004
3. J.R. Kemm Can health impact assessment fulfill the expectations it raises? Public Health 114 2000 431 433
4. J. Parry, A. Stevens Prospective health impact assessment pitfalls, problems and possible ways forward BMJ 323 2001 1177 1182
5. Northern and York Public Health Observatory. An overview of health impact assessment, Occasional Paper 1.Available at: www.phel.gov.uk/hiadocs/ 200_overview_of_hia_occasional_paper_1.pdf Accessed March 17, 2004.
6. D. Kindig, P. Day, D.M. Fox What new knowledge would help policymakers better balance investments for optimal health outcomes? Health Services Res 38 2003 1923 1937
7. P.A. Ratner, L.W. Green, C.J. Frankish, T. Chomik, C. Larsen Setting the stage for health impact assessment J Public Health Policy 18 1997 67 79
8. Health Canada EA within a Canadian context Canadian handbook on health impact assessment 1999 Health Canada Ottawa 4-1-4-4. Available at www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hecs-sesc/ehas/pdf/vol1-part2_handbook.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2004.
9. A. Scott-Samuel, M. Birley, K. Ardern The Merseyside guidelines for health impact assessment 2nd ed 2001 International Health Impact Assessment Consortium Liverpool
10. Landstingsforbundet. Examples of how to start up and implement health impact assessments (HIA). Stockholm County Council, Southwestern Health District. Available at: www.lf.svekom.se/artikel.asp%3FC=900%26A=1327 Accessed March 15, 2004.
11. R. Fehr Environmental health impact assessment evaluation of a ten-step model Epidemiology 10 1999 618 625
12. Tasmania Department of Health & Human Services (Australia). Health impact assessment. Available at: www.dhhs.tas.gov.au/publichealth/ legislationandguidelines/healthimpact.html. Accessed February 2, 2004.
13. Kjellstrom T, Hill S. New Zealand evidence for health impacts of transport. A background paper prepared for the Public Health Advisory Committee. New Zealand National Advisory Committee on Health and Disability. Available at: ww.nhc.govt.nz/PHAC/publications/HealthImpactsTransportPHAC.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2004.
14. Department of Health (England) Independent inquiry into inequalities in health report, Sir Donald Acheson, Chair. Prepared for the Department of Health, England 1998 Stationery Office London Available at: www.official-documents.co. uk/document/doh/ih/ih.htm Accessed March 15, 2004
15. M. Lalonde A new perspective on the health of Canadians 1974 Minister of Supply and Services Ottawa
16. J. Epp Achieving health for all a framework for health promotion 1986 Health and Welfare Canada Ottawa Available at: www.hc-sc.gc.ca/english/care/ achieving_health.html. Accessed March 15, 2004.
17. Health Canada Report on the health of Canadians 1996 Federal Provincial and Territorial Advisory Committee on Population Health Toronto
18. S. Glouberman, J. Millar Evolution of the determinants of health, health policy, and health information systems in Canada Am J Public Health 93 2003 388 392
19. D. Goulet Three rationalities in development decisions. Working Paper 42 1985 Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies Notre Dame IN University of Notre Dame
20. Cochrane Collaboration. Available at: www.cochrane.org. Accessed February 5, 2004.
21. S. Zaza, R.S. Lawrence, C.S. Mahan, M. Fullilove, D. Fleming, G.J. Isham, M. Pappaioanou Task force on Community Preventive Services scope and organization of the Guide to Community Preventive Services Am J Prev Med 18 2000 27 34 Available at www.thecommunityguide.org. Accessed March 15, 2004.
22. Campbell Collaboration. Available at: www.campbellcollaboration.org. Accessed February 5, 2004.
23. B.J. Ale, M. Piers The assessment and management of third party risk around a major airport J Hazard Mater 71 2000 1 16
24. W.S. Browner, J. Westenhouse, J.A. Tice What if Americans ate less fat? A quantitative estimate of the effect on mortality JAMA 265 1991 3285 3291
25. R. Bhatia, M. Katz Estimation of health benefits from a local living wage ordinance Am J Public Health 91 2001 1398 1402
26. Cole BL, Shimkhada R, Morgenstern H, Kominski G, Fielding JE, Wu S. The projected health impact of the Los Angeles City Living Wage Ordinance. Summary. Available at: www.ph.ucla.edu/hs/health-impact. Accessed March 15, 2004.
27. J.K. Hammitt, E.S. Belsky, J.I. Levy, J.D. Graham Residential building codes, affordability and health protection a risk-tradeoff approach Risk Analysis 19 1999 1037 1058
28. R.A. Ponce, S.M. Bartell, E.Y. Wong Use of quality-adjusted life year weights with does-response models for public health decisions a case study of the risks and benefits of fish consumption Risk Analysis 20 2000 529 542
29. Rice G, Boutin B, Brown M, et al. Methodology for comparing risks, benefits, and financial costs of environmental health options. Paper presented at the 1999 annual meeting of the Society for Risk Analysis. Abstract. Available at: www.riskworld.com/Abstract/1999/SRAam99/ab9ab287.htm. Full report. Available at: www.epa.gov/ncea/frame.htm. Accessed March 15, 2004.
30. World Health Organization. Health impact assessment (HIA). Available at: www.who.int/hia/en/ Accessed March 4, 2004.
31. S. Anand, K. Hanson Disability-adjusted life years a critical review J Health Econ 16 1997 685 702
32. C. Campbell-Mohn, J.S. Applegate Learning from NEPA guidelines for responsible risk legislation Harvard Environ Law Rev 23 1999 93 139
33. R.R. Kuehn The environmental justice implications of quantitative risk assessment Univ Illinois Law Rev 1 1996 103 172
34. M.R. Powell Science at EPA information in the regulatory process 1999 Resources for the Future Washington DC
35. World Health Organization. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Presented at the First International Conference on Health Promotion. Available at: www.who.dk/AboutWHO/Policy/20010827_2 Accessed February 5, 2004.
36. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. Health Cities and urban governance. Avialable at: www.euro.who.in/healthy-cities Accessed January 5, 2004.
37. World Health Organization A guide to assessing healthy cities, no. 3, World Health Organization Healthy Cities Project 1988 WHO Healthy Cities Papers Copenhagen
38. N. Fleeman, A. Scott-Samuel A prospective health impact assessment of the Merseyside Integrated Transport Strategy (MerITS) J Public Health Med 22 2000 268 274
39. L.Y. Winters A prospective health impact assessment of the international astronomy and space exploration center J Epidemiol Community Health 55 2001 433 441
40. R. Bhatia Health inequity, land use planning and health impact assessment, a case study from San Francisco. Presentation at the Symposium on Land Use and Health: Fostering Collaboration between Planners and Public Environmental Health 2004 Washington DC
41. Health Canada Health indicators for use in EA Canadian handbook on health impact assessment, volume 1, part 1 1999 Health Canada Ottawa 3-1-3-6 www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hecs-sesc/ehas/pdf/vol1-part1_can_handbook.pdf Accessed March 17, 2004
42. Health Council (Australia) Health impact assessment implementation guidelines 2001 Environmental Health Section, Department of Health and Aged Care Canberra September, Available at: http://enhealth.nphp.gov.au/council/pubs/pdf/ hia_guidelines.pdf Accessed March 17, 2004.
43. B.J. Rosenberg, E.M. Barbeau, R. Moure-Eraso, C. Levenstein The work environment impact assessment a methodologic framework for evaluating health-based interventions Am J Ind Med 39 2001 218 226
44. A. Steinemann Rethinking human health impact assessment Environ Impact Assess Rev 20 2000 627 645
45. B.L. Cole, M. Willhelm, P.V. Long, J.E. Fielding, G. Kominski, H. Morgenstern Prospects for health impact assessment in the United States new and improved environmental impact assessment or something different? J Health Polit Policy Law 2004 291153 291186
46. B.F. Leon Environmental analysis S.G. Hildebrand S.G. Cannon The NEPA experience 1993 Lewis Publishers Boca Raton FL
47. L.K. Caldwell The National Environmental Policy Act an agenda for the future 1998 Indiana University Press Bloomington
48. T. Garvin Analyltical paradigms the epistemiological distances between scientists, policy makers, and the public Risk Analysis 21 2001 443 455
49. D. Hunter, C. Pollitt Developments in health services research perspectives from Britain and the United States J Public Health Med 14 1992 164 168
50. J.N. Lavis, E.S. Ross, J.E. Herley Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking Milbank Q 80 2002 125 153
51. C.H. Weiss Policy research data, ideas, or arguments P. Wagner C.H. Weiss B. Wittrock H. Wollmann Social sciences and modern states national experiences and theoretical crossroads 1991 Cambridge University Press Cambridge 307 332
52. J.M. Mooy, L.J. Gunning-Schepers Computer-assisted health impact assessment for intersectoral health policy Health Policy 57 2001 169 177
53. M. Utley, S. Gallivan, J. Biddulph, M. McCarthy, J. Ferguson ARMADA - a computer model of the impact of environmental factors on health Health Care Manag Sci 6 2003 137 146
54. L. Nilunger, F. Diderichsen, B. Burstrom, P. Ostlin Using risk analysis in health impact assessment the impact of different relative risks for men and women in different socio-economic groups Health Policy 67 2004 215 224